On the Relationship Between Stakeholder Affiliation and Attitudes Toward Behavioral Health Reform in Kansas

INTRODUCTION: The lack of access to behavioral health care, trends in behavioral health issues, and the impact of social determinants of health underlie the need for behavioral health reform in Kansas. However, stakeholders may affect progress toward behavioral health reform. This study examined stakeholders’ attitudes toward behavioral health reform. METHODS: The authors analyzed data from a survey administered to elected officials, members of health advocacy groups, state employees, and payers in Kansas. Main outcome measures included attitudes toward the perceived benefit of certain behavioral health and social determinants of health policies and the perceived performance of the primary care and behavioral health care systems in Kansas. RESULTS: Payers perceived legislation to improve insurance coverage for behavioral health issues as less beneficial than state employees and members of health advocacy groups. Elected officials perceived legislation to address various social determinants of health as less beneficial than health advocates. Members of health advocacy groups rated the behavioral health care system more poorly than elected officials did. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings reflected both the barriers and facilitators to behavioral health reform in Kansas. However, several limitations undermined the generalizability of these findings. Future studies should consider more representative sample sizes, additional variables in behavioral health and social determinants of health policies, and more comprehensive, validated measures.