Cargando…

Conception and Interpretation of Interdisciplinarity in Research Practice: Findings from Group Discussions in the Emerging Field of Digital Transformation

In recent years, we have been observing the phenomenon of an emerging scientific field: digital transformation research (DTR). Due to the diversity and complexity of its object of research digital, transformation is not effectively researchable if confined to the boundaries of individual disciplines...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmitt, Josephine B., Goldmann, Anne, Simon, Samuel T., Bieber, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37192964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09489-w
_version_ 1784894881949286400
author Schmitt, Josephine B.
Goldmann, Anne
Simon, Samuel T.
Bieber, Christoph
author_facet Schmitt, Josephine B.
Goldmann, Anne
Simon, Samuel T.
Bieber, Christoph
author_sort Schmitt, Josephine B.
collection PubMed
description In recent years, we have been observing the phenomenon of an emerging scientific field: digital transformation research (DTR). Due to the diversity and complexity of its object of research digital, transformation is not effectively researchable if confined to the boundaries of individual disciplines. In the light of Scientific/Intellectual Movement theory (Frickel and Gross 2005), we wonder how interdisciplinarity could and should be mobilized to further advance the development of the field of DTR. To answer this question, we (a) need to understand how interdisciplinarity is conceived and (b) how it is considered in research practice by researchers in the emerging field. This is important, as scientists’ application of interdisciplinarity will highly influence an emerging field, shape its growth, consolidation as well as its academic establishment. We conducted six group discussions with 26 researchers from different disciplines and career levels (PhD students, postdocs, professors). The discussions were studied with a structuring qualitative content analysis. The results reflect the vagueness of the concept of interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinarity is largely conceived as multidisciplinarity. Further, the interviewees mentioned more challenges than opportunities when it comes to interdisciplinary DTR. The present study widens the scientific understanding about how researchers of different career levels perceive, learn, and practice interdisciplinarity in DTR. It further provides valuable indications of how interdisciplinary research in an emerging field can be profitably shaped for practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9957685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99576852023-02-28 Conception and Interpretation of Interdisciplinarity in Research Practice: Findings from Group Discussions in the Emerging Field of Digital Transformation Schmitt, Josephine B. Goldmann, Anne Simon, Samuel T. Bieber, Christoph Minerva Article In recent years, we have been observing the phenomenon of an emerging scientific field: digital transformation research (DTR). Due to the diversity and complexity of its object of research digital, transformation is not effectively researchable if confined to the boundaries of individual disciplines. In the light of Scientific/Intellectual Movement theory (Frickel and Gross 2005), we wonder how interdisciplinarity could and should be mobilized to further advance the development of the field of DTR. To answer this question, we (a) need to understand how interdisciplinarity is conceived and (b) how it is considered in research practice by researchers in the emerging field. This is important, as scientists’ application of interdisciplinarity will highly influence an emerging field, shape its growth, consolidation as well as its academic establishment. We conducted six group discussions with 26 researchers from different disciplines and career levels (PhD students, postdocs, professors). The discussions were studied with a structuring qualitative content analysis. The results reflect the vagueness of the concept of interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinarity is largely conceived as multidisciplinarity. Further, the interviewees mentioned more challenges than opportunities when it comes to interdisciplinary DTR. The present study widens the scientific understanding about how researchers of different career levels perceive, learn, and practice interdisciplinarity in DTR. It further provides valuable indications of how interdisciplinary research in an emerging field can be profitably shaped for practice. Springer Netherlands 2023-02-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9957685/ /pubmed/37192964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09489-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Schmitt, Josephine B.
Goldmann, Anne
Simon, Samuel T.
Bieber, Christoph
Conception and Interpretation of Interdisciplinarity in Research Practice: Findings from Group Discussions in the Emerging Field of Digital Transformation
title Conception and Interpretation of Interdisciplinarity in Research Practice: Findings from Group Discussions in the Emerging Field of Digital Transformation
title_full Conception and Interpretation of Interdisciplinarity in Research Practice: Findings from Group Discussions in the Emerging Field of Digital Transformation
title_fullStr Conception and Interpretation of Interdisciplinarity in Research Practice: Findings from Group Discussions in the Emerging Field of Digital Transformation
title_full_unstemmed Conception and Interpretation of Interdisciplinarity in Research Practice: Findings from Group Discussions in the Emerging Field of Digital Transformation
title_short Conception and Interpretation of Interdisciplinarity in Research Practice: Findings from Group Discussions in the Emerging Field of Digital Transformation
title_sort conception and interpretation of interdisciplinarity in research practice: findings from group discussions in the emerging field of digital transformation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37192964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09489-w
work_keys_str_mv AT schmittjosephineb conceptionandinterpretationofinterdisciplinarityinresearchpracticefindingsfromgroupdiscussionsintheemergingfieldofdigitaltransformation
AT goldmannanne conceptionandinterpretationofinterdisciplinarityinresearchpracticefindingsfromgroupdiscussionsintheemergingfieldofdigitaltransformation
AT simonsamuelt conceptionandinterpretationofinterdisciplinarityinresearchpracticefindingsfromgroupdiscussionsintheemergingfieldofdigitaltransformation
AT bieberchristoph conceptionandinterpretationofinterdisciplinarityinresearchpracticefindingsfromgroupdiscussionsintheemergingfieldofdigitaltransformation