Cargando…

Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning

BACKGROUND: Manual segmentation of the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) in panoramic images requires considerable time and labor even for dental experts having extensive experience. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of automatic segmentation of IAC with ambiguity classificatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Shuo, Li, An, Li, Ping, Yun, Zhaoqiang, Lin, Guoye, Cheng, Jun, Xu, Shulan, Qiu, Bingjiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13694
_version_ 1784894897709383680
author Yang, Shuo
Li, An
Li, Ping
Yun, Zhaoqiang
Lin, Guoye
Cheng, Jun
Xu, Shulan
Qiu, Bingjiang
author_facet Yang, Shuo
Li, An
Li, Ping
Yun, Zhaoqiang
Lin, Guoye
Cheng, Jun
Xu, Shulan
Qiu, Bingjiang
author_sort Yang, Shuo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Manual segmentation of the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) in panoramic images requires considerable time and labor even for dental experts having extensive experience. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of automatic segmentation of IAC with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using a deep learning method. METHODS: Among 1366 panoramic images, 1000 were selected as the training dataset and the remaining 336 were assigned to the testing dataset. The radiologists divided the testing dataset into four groups according to the quality of the visible segments of IAC. The segmentation time, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision, and recall rate were calculated to evaluate the efficiency and segmentation performance of deep learning-based automatic segmentation. RESULTS: Automatic segmentation achieved a DSC of 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75.4%–90.3%), precision of 84.1% (95% CI 78.4%–89.3%), and recall of 87.7% (95% CI 77.7%–93.4%). Compared with manual annotation (5.9s per image), automatic segmentation significantly increased the efficiency of IAC segmentation (33 ms per image). The DSC and precision values of group 4 (most visible) were significantly better than those of group 1 (least visible). The recall values of groups 3 and 4 were significantly better than those of group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The deep learning-based method achieved high performance for IAC segmentation in panoramic images under different visibilities and was positively correlated with IAC image clarity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9957750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99577502023-02-26 Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning Yang, Shuo Li, An Li, Ping Yun, Zhaoqiang Lin, Guoye Cheng, Jun Xu, Shulan Qiu, Bingjiang Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: Manual segmentation of the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) in panoramic images requires considerable time and labor even for dental experts having extensive experience. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of automatic segmentation of IAC with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using a deep learning method. METHODS: Among 1366 panoramic images, 1000 were selected as the training dataset and the remaining 336 were assigned to the testing dataset. The radiologists divided the testing dataset into four groups according to the quality of the visible segments of IAC. The segmentation time, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision, and recall rate were calculated to evaluate the efficiency and segmentation performance of deep learning-based automatic segmentation. RESULTS: Automatic segmentation achieved a DSC of 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75.4%–90.3%), precision of 84.1% (95% CI 78.4%–89.3%), and recall of 87.7% (95% CI 77.7%–93.4%). Compared with manual annotation (5.9s per image), automatic segmentation significantly increased the efficiency of IAC segmentation (33 ms per image). The DSC and precision values of group 4 (most visible) were significantly better than those of group 1 (least visible). The recall values of groups 3 and 4 were significantly better than those of group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The deep learning-based method achieved high performance for IAC segmentation in panoramic images under different visibilities and was positively correlated with IAC image clarity. Elsevier 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9957750/ /pubmed/36852021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13694 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Shuo
Li, An
Li, Ping
Yun, Zhaoqiang
Lin, Guoye
Cheng, Jun
Xu, Shulan
Qiu, Bingjiang
Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning
title Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning
title_full Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning
title_fullStr Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning
title_short Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning
title_sort automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13694
work_keys_str_mv AT yangshuo automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning
AT lian automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning
AT liping automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning
AT yunzhaoqiang automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning
AT linguoye automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning
AT chengjun automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning
AT xushulan automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning
AT qiubingjiang automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning