Cargando…
Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning
BACKGROUND: Manual segmentation of the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) in panoramic images requires considerable time and labor even for dental experts having extensive experience. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of automatic segmentation of IAC with ambiguity classificatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13694 |
_version_ | 1784894897709383680 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Shuo Li, An Li, Ping Yun, Zhaoqiang Lin, Guoye Cheng, Jun Xu, Shulan Qiu, Bingjiang |
author_facet | Yang, Shuo Li, An Li, Ping Yun, Zhaoqiang Lin, Guoye Cheng, Jun Xu, Shulan Qiu, Bingjiang |
author_sort | Yang, Shuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Manual segmentation of the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) in panoramic images requires considerable time and labor even for dental experts having extensive experience. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of automatic segmentation of IAC with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using a deep learning method. METHODS: Among 1366 panoramic images, 1000 were selected as the training dataset and the remaining 336 were assigned to the testing dataset. The radiologists divided the testing dataset into four groups according to the quality of the visible segments of IAC. The segmentation time, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision, and recall rate were calculated to evaluate the efficiency and segmentation performance of deep learning-based automatic segmentation. RESULTS: Automatic segmentation achieved a DSC of 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75.4%–90.3%), precision of 84.1% (95% CI 78.4%–89.3%), and recall of 87.7% (95% CI 77.7%–93.4%). Compared with manual annotation (5.9s per image), automatic segmentation significantly increased the efficiency of IAC segmentation (33 ms per image). The DSC and precision values of group 4 (most visible) were significantly better than those of group 1 (least visible). The recall values of groups 3 and 4 were significantly better than those of group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The deep learning-based method achieved high performance for IAC segmentation in panoramic images under different visibilities and was positively correlated with IAC image clarity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9957750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99577502023-02-26 Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning Yang, Shuo Li, An Li, Ping Yun, Zhaoqiang Lin, Guoye Cheng, Jun Xu, Shulan Qiu, Bingjiang Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: Manual segmentation of the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) in panoramic images requires considerable time and labor even for dental experts having extensive experience. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of automatic segmentation of IAC with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using a deep learning method. METHODS: Among 1366 panoramic images, 1000 were selected as the training dataset and the remaining 336 were assigned to the testing dataset. The radiologists divided the testing dataset into four groups according to the quality of the visible segments of IAC. The segmentation time, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision, and recall rate were calculated to evaluate the efficiency and segmentation performance of deep learning-based automatic segmentation. RESULTS: Automatic segmentation achieved a DSC of 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75.4%–90.3%), precision of 84.1% (95% CI 78.4%–89.3%), and recall of 87.7% (95% CI 77.7%–93.4%). Compared with manual annotation (5.9s per image), automatic segmentation significantly increased the efficiency of IAC segmentation (33 ms per image). The DSC and precision values of group 4 (most visible) were significantly better than those of group 1 (least visible). The recall values of groups 3 and 4 were significantly better than those of group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The deep learning-based method achieved high performance for IAC segmentation in panoramic images under different visibilities and was positively correlated with IAC image clarity. Elsevier 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9957750/ /pubmed/36852021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13694 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Shuo Li, An Li, Ping Yun, Zhaoqiang Lin, Guoye Cheng, Jun Xu, Shulan Qiu, Bingjiang Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning |
title | Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning |
title_full | Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning |
title_fullStr | Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning |
title_short | Automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning |
title_sort | automatic segmentation of inferior alveolar canal with ambiguity classification in panoramic images using deep learning |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangshuo automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning AT lian automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning AT liping automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning AT yunzhaoqiang automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning AT linguoye automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning AT chengjun automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning AT xushulan automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning AT qiubingjiang automaticsegmentationofinferioralveolarcanalwithambiguityclassificationinpanoramicimagesusingdeeplearning |