Cargando…
Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants
The hippocampus, critical for learning and memory, undergoes substantial changes early in life. Investigating the developmental trajectory of hippocampal structure and function requires an accurate method for segmenting this region from anatomical MRI scans. Although manual segmentation is regarded...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36791555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101203 |
_version_ | 1784894905902956544 |
---|---|
author | Fel, J.T. Ellis, C.T. Turk-Browne, N.B. |
author_facet | Fel, J.T. Ellis, C.T. Turk-Browne, N.B. |
author_sort | Fel, J.T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The hippocampus, critical for learning and memory, undergoes substantial changes early in life. Investigating the developmental trajectory of hippocampal structure and function requires an accurate method for segmenting this region from anatomical MRI scans. Although manual segmentation is regarded as the “gold standard” approach, it is laborious and subjective. This has fueled the pursuit of automated segmentation methods in adults. However, little is known about the reliability of these automated protocols in infants, particularly when anatomical scan quality is degraded by head motion or the use of shorter and quieter infant-friendly sequences. During a task-based fMRI protocol, we collected quiet T1-weighted anatomical scans from 42 sessions with awake infants aged 4–23 months. Two expert tracers first segmented the hippocampus in both hemispheres manually. The resulting inter-rater reliability (IRR) was only moderate, reflecting the difficulty of infant segmentation. We then used four protocols to predict these manual segmentations: average adult template, average infant template, FreeSurfer software, and Automated Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) software. ASHS generated the most reliable hippocampal segmentations in infants, exceeding the manual IRR of experts. Automated methods thus provide robust hippocampal segmentations of noisy T1-weighted infant scans, opening new possibilities for interrogating early hippocampal development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9957787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99577872023-02-26 Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants Fel, J.T. Ellis, C.T. Turk-Browne, N.B. Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research The hippocampus, critical for learning and memory, undergoes substantial changes early in life. Investigating the developmental trajectory of hippocampal structure and function requires an accurate method for segmenting this region from anatomical MRI scans. Although manual segmentation is regarded as the “gold standard” approach, it is laborious and subjective. This has fueled the pursuit of automated segmentation methods in adults. However, little is known about the reliability of these automated protocols in infants, particularly when anatomical scan quality is degraded by head motion or the use of shorter and quieter infant-friendly sequences. During a task-based fMRI protocol, we collected quiet T1-weighted anatomical scans from 42 sessions with awake infants aged 4–23 months. Two expert tracers first segmented the hippocampus in both hemispheres manually. The resulting inter-rater reliability (IRR) was only moderate, reflecting the difficulty of infant segmentation. We then used four protocols to predict these manual segmentations: average adult template, average infant template, FreeSurfer software, and Automated Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) software. ASHS generated the most reliable hippocampal segmentations in infants, exceeding the manual IRR of experts. Automated methods thus provide robust hippocampal segmentations of noisy T1-weighted infant scans, opening new possibilities for interrogating early hippocampal development. Elsevier 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9957787/ /pubmed/36791555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101203 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Fel, J.T. Ellis, C.T. Turk-Browne, N.B. Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants |
title | Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants |
title_full | Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants |
title_fullStr | Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants |
title_short | Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants |
title_sort | automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36791555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feljt automatedandmanualsegmentationofthehippocampusinhumaninfants AT ellisct automatedandmanualsegmentationofthehippocampusinhumaninfants AT turkbrownenb automatedandmanualsegmentationofthehippocampusinhumaninfants |