Cargando…

Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants

The hippocampus, critical for learning and memory, undergoes substantial changes early in life. Investigating the developmental trajectory of hippocampal structure and function requires an accurate method for segmenting this region from anatomical MRI scans. Although manual segmentation is regarded...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fel, J.T., Ellis, C.T., Turk-Browne, N.B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36791555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101203
_version_ 1784894905902956544
author Fel, J.T.
Ellis, C.T.
Turk-Browne, N.B.
author_facet Fel, J.T.
Ellis, C.T.
Turk-Browne, N.B.
author_sort Fel, J.T.
collection PubMed
description The hippocampus, critical for learning and memory, undergoes substantial changes early in life. Investigating the developmental trajectory of hippocampal structure and function requires an accurate method for segmenting this region from anatomical MRI scans. Although manual segmentation is regarded as the “gold standard” approach, it is laborious and subjective. This has fueled the pursuit of automated segmentation methods in adults. However, little is known about the reliability of these automated protocols in infants, particularly when anatomical scan quality is degraded by head motion or the use of shorter and quieter infant-friendly sequences. During a task-based fMRI protocol, we collected quiet T1-weighted anatomical scans from 42 sessions with awake infants aged 4–23 months. Two expert tracers first segmented the hippocampus in both hemispheres manually. The resulting inter-rater reliability (IRR) was only moderate, reflecting the difficulty of infant segmentation. We then used four protocols to predict these manual segmentations: average adult template, average infant template, FreeSurfer software, and Automated Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) software. ASHS generated the most reliable hippocampal segmentations in infants, exceeding the manual IRR of experts. Automated methods thus provide robust hippocampal segmentations of noisy T1-weighted infant scans, opening new possibilities for interrogating early hippocampal development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9957787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99577872023-02-26 Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants Fel, J.T. Ellis, C.T. Turk-Browne, N.B. Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research The hippocampus, critical for learning and memory, undergoes substantial changes early in life. Investigating the developmental trajectory of hippocampal structure and function requires an accurate method for segmenting this region from anatomical MRI scans. Although manual segmentation is regarded as the “gold standard” approach, it is laborious and subjective. This has fueled the pursuit of automated segmentation methods in adults. However, little is known about the reliability of these automated protocols in infants, particularly when anatomical scan quality is degraded by head motion or the use of shorter and quieter infant-friendly sequences. During a task-based fMRI protocol, we collected quiet T1-weighted anatomical scans from 42 sessions with awake infants aged 4–23 months. Two expert tracers first segmented the hippocampus in both hemispheres manually. The resulting inter-rater reliability (IRR) was only moderate, reflecting the difficulty of infant segmentation. We then used four protocols to predict these manual segmentations: average adult template, average infant template, FreeSurfer software, and Automated Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) software. ASHS generated the most reliable hippocampal segmentations in infants, exceeding the manual IRR of experts. Automated methods thus provide robust hippocampal segmentations of noisy T1-weighted infant scans, opening new possibilities for interrogating early hippocampal development. Elsevier 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9957787/ /pubmed/36791555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101203 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Fel, J.T.
Ellis, C.T.
Turk-Browne, N.B.
Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants
title Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants
title_full Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants
title_fullStr Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants
title_full_unstemmed Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants
title_short Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants
title_sort automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36791555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101203
work_keys_str_mv AT feljt automatedandmanualsegmentationofthehippocampusinhumaninfants
AT ellisct automatedandmanualsegmentationofthehippocampusinhumaninfants
AT turkbrownenb automatedandmanualsegmentationofthehippocampusinhumaninfants