Cargando…

Genetic and microbiome analysis of feed efficiency in laying hens

Improving feed efficiency is an important target for poultry breeding. Feed efficiency is affected by host genetics and the gut microbiota, but many of the mechanisms remain elusive in laying hens, especially in the late laying period. In this study, we measured feed intake, body weight, and egg mas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Qianqian, Lan, Fangren, Gu, Shuang, Li, Guangqi, Wu, Guiqin, Yan, Yiyuan, Li, Xiaochang, Jin, Jiaming, Wen, Chaoliang, Sun, Congjiao, Yang, Ning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36805401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102393
_version_ 1784894952786886656
author Zhou, Qianqian
Lan, Fangren
Gu, Shuang
Li, Guangqi
Wu, Guiqin
Yan, Yiyuan
Li, Xiaochang
Jin, Jiaming
Wen, Chaoliang
Sun, Congjiao
Yang, Ning
author_facet Zhou, Qianqian
Lan, Fangren
Gu, Shuang
Li, Guangqi
Wu, Guiqin
Yan, Yiyuan
Li, Xiaochang
Jin, Jiaming
Wen, Chaoliang
Sun, Congjiao
Yang, Ning
author_sort Zhou, Qianqian
collection PubMed
description Improving feed efficiency is an important target for poultry breeding. Feed efficiency is affected by host genetics and the gut microbiota, but many of the mechanisms remain elusive in laying hens, especially in the late laying period. In this study, we measured feed intake, body weight, and egg mass of 714 hens from a pedigreed line from 69 to 72 wk of age and calculated the residual feed intake (RFI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR). In addition, fecal samples were also collected for 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (V4 region). Genetic analysis was then conducted in DMU packages by using AI-REML with animal model. Moderate heritability estimates for FCR (h(2) = 0.31) and RFI (h(2) = 0.52) were observed, suggesting that proper selection programs can directly improve feed efficiency. Genetically, RFI was less correlated with body weight and egg mass than that of FCR. The phenotypic variance explained by gut microbial variance is defined as the microbiability (m(2)). The microbiability estimates for FCR (m(2) = 0.03) and RFI (m(2) = 0.16) suggested the gut microbiota was also involved in the regulation of feed efficiency. In addition, our results showed that the effect of host genetics on fecal microbiota was minor in three aspects: 1) microbial diversity indexes had low heritability estimates, and genera with heritability estimates more than 0.1 accounted for only 1.07% of the tested fecal microbiota; 2) the genetic relationship correlations between host genetics and different microbial distance were very weak, ranging from −0.0057 to −0.0003; 3) the microbial distance between different kinships showed no significant difference. Since the RFI has the highest microbiability, we further screened out three genera, including Anaerosporobacter, Candidatus Stoquefichus, and Fournierella, which were negatively correlated with RFI and played positive roles in improving the feed efficiency. These findings contribute to a great understanding of the genetic background and microbial influences on feed efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9958098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99580982023-02-26 Genetic and microbiome analysis of feed efficiency in laying hens Zhou, Qianqian Lan, Fangren Gu, Shuang Li, Guangqi Wu, Guiqin Yan, Yiyuan Li, Xiaochang Jin, Jiaming Wen, Chaoliang Sun, Congjiao Yang, Ning Poult Sci GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Improving feed efficiency is an important target for poultry breeding. Feed efficiency is affected by host genetics and the gut microbiota, but many of the mechanisms remain elusive in laying hens, especially in the late laying period. In this study, we measured feed intake, body weight, and egg mass of 714 hens from a pedigreed line from 69 to 72 wk of age and calculated the residual feed intake (RFI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR). In addition, fecal samples were also collected for 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (V4 region). Genetic analysis was then conducted in DMU packages by using AI-REML with animal model. Moderate heritability estimates for FCR (h(2) = 0.31) and RFI (h(2) = 0.52) were observed, suggesting that proper selection programs can directly improve feed efficiency. Genetically, RFI was less correlated with body weight and egg mass than that of FCR. The phenotypic variance explained by gut microbial variance is defined as the microbiability (m(2)). The microbiability estimates for FCR (m(2) = 0.03) and RFI (m(2) = 0.16) suggested the gut microbiota was also involved in the regulation of feed efficiency. In addition, our results showed that the effect of host genetics on fecal microbiota was minor in three aspects: 1) microbial diversity indexes had low heritability estimates, and genera with heritability estimates more than 0.1 accounted for only 1.07% of the tested fecal microbiota; 2) the genetic relationship correlations between host genetics and different microbial distance were very weak, ranging from −0.0057 to −0.0003; 3) the microbial distance between different kinships showed no significant difference. Since the RFI has the highest microbiability, we further screened out three genera, including Anaerosporobacter, Candidatus Stoquefichus, and Fournierella, which were negatively correlated with RFI and played positive roles in improving the feed efficiency. These findings contribute to a great understanding of the genetic background and microbial influences on feed efficiency. Elsevier 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9958098/ /pubmed/36805401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102393 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Zhou, Qianqian
Lan, Fangren
Gu, Shuang
Li, Guangqi
Wu, Guiqin
Yan, Yiyuan
Li, Xiaochang
Jin, Jiaming
Wen, Chaoliang
Sun, Congjiao
Yang, Ning
Genetic and microbiome analysis of feed efficiency in laying hens
title Genetic and microbiome analysis of feed efficiency in laying hens
title_full Genetic and microbiome analysis of feed efficiency in laying hens
title_fullStr Genetic and microbiome analysis of feed efficiency in laying hens
title_full_unstemmed Genetic and microbiome analysis of feed efficiency in laying hens
title_short Genetic and microbiome analysis of feed efficiency in laying hens
title_sort genetic and microbiome analysis of feed efficiency in laying hens
topic GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36805401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102393
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouqianqian geneticandmicrobiomeanalysisoffeedefficiencyinlayinghens
AT lanfangren geneticandmicrobiomeanalysisoffeedefficiencyinlayinghens
AT gushuang geneticandmicrobiomeanalysisoffeedefficiencyinlayinghens
AT liguangqi geneticandmicrobiomeanalysisoffeedefficiencyinlayinghens
AT wuguiqin geneticandmicrobiomeanalysisoffeedefficiencyinlayinghens
AT yanyiyuan geneticandmicrobiomeanalysisoffeedefficiencyinlayinghens
AT lixiaochang geneticandmicrobiomeanalysisoffeedefficiencyinlayinghens
AT jinjiaming geneticandmicrobiomeanalysisoffeedefficiencyinlayinghens
AT wenchaoliang geneticandmicrobiomeanalysisoffeedefficiencyinlayinghens
AT suncongjiao geneticandmicrobiomeanalysisoffeedefficiencyinlayinghens
AT yangning geneticandmicrobiomeanalysisoffeedefficiencyinlayinghens