Cargando…

Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials: In vitro analysis

OBJECTIVES: As part of orthodontic treatment, air polishing is routinely used for professional tooth cleaning. Thus, we investigated the effects of static powder polishing on sliding behaviour and surface quality of three different bracket materials (polymer, ceramic, metal), including a 3D-printed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hodecker, Lutz, Bourauel, Christoph, Braumann, Bert, Kruse, Teresa, Christ, Hildegard, Scharf, Sven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00352-9
_version_ 1784894965001748480
author Hodecker, Lutz
Bourauel, Christoph
Braumann, Bert
Kruse, Teresa
Christ, Hildegard
Scharf, Sven
author_facet Hodecker, Lutz
Bourauel, Christoph
Braumann, Bert
Kruse, Teresa
Christ, Hildegard
Scharf, Sven
author_sort Hodecker, Lutz
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: As part of orthodontic treatment, air polishing is routinely used for professional tooth cleaning. Thus, we investigated the effects of static powder polishing on sliding behaviour and surface quality of three different bracket materials (polymer, ceramic, metal), including a 3D-printed bracket. METHODS: Two bracket types of each material group were polished with an air-polishing device using sodium bicarbonate. Exposure times were set at 10, 20, and 60 s; the application distance was 5 mm. The force loss due to sliding resistance was tested with an orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) using a 0.016 inch × 0.022 inch stainless steel archwire. Untreated brackets served as control. Polishing effects and slot precision were evaluated using an optical digital and scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: Sliding behaviour and slot precision differed significantly between and within the groups. Prior to polishing, polymer brackets showed the least force loss, ceramic brackets the highest. With progressive polishing time, the resistance increased significantly with titanium brackets (26 to 37%) and decreased significantly with steel brackets (36 to 25%). Polymer brackets showed the smallest changes in force loss with respect to polishing duration. Slot precision showed the largest differences between material groups and was primarily manufacturer-dependent with hardly any changes due to the polishing time. CONCLUSION: Powder polishing can positively or negatively affect the sliding properties of the bracket–archwire complex but is more dependent on the bracket–archwire material combination (i.e., manufacture-dependent slot precision). For titanium brackets, resistance only increased after 60 s of polishing. For ceramic brackets, effective reduction was observed after 10 s of polishing. Polymer brackets, including the 3D-printed brackets, showed better sliding properties than ceramic or metal brackets even after polishing for 60 s. Removal of plaque and dental calculus should lead to a noticeable improvement of the sliding properties and outweighs structural defects that may develop.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9958151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99581512023-02-26 Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials: In vitro analysis Hodecker, Lutz Bourauel, Christoph Braumann, Bert Kruse, Teresa Christ, Hildegard Scharf, Sven J Orofac Orthop Original Article OBJECTIVES: As part of orthodontic treatment, air polishing is routinely used for professional tooth cleaning. Thus, we investigated the effects of static powder polishing on sliding behaviour and surface quality of three different bracket materials (polymer, ceramic, metal), including a 3D-printed bracket. METHODS: Two bracket types of each material group were polished with an air-polishing device using sodium bicarbonate. Exposure times were set at 10, 20, and 60 s; the application distance was 5 mm. The force loss due to sliding resistance was tested with an orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) using a 0.016 inch × 0.022 inch stainless steel archwire. Untreated brackets served as control. Polishing effects and slot precision were evaluated using an optical digital and scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: Sliding behaviour and slot precision differed significantly between and within the groups. Prior to polishing, polymer brackets showed the least force loss, ceramic brackets the highest. With progressive polishing time, the resistance increased significantly with titanium brackets (26 to 37%) and decreased significantly with steel brackets (36 to 25%). Polymer brackets showed the smallest changes in force loss with respect to polishing duration. Slot precision showed the largest differences between material groups and was primarily manufacturer-dependent with hardly any changes due to the polishing time. CONCLUSION: Powder polishing can positively or negatively affect the sliding properties of the bracket–archwire complex but is more dependent on the bracket–archwire material combination (i.e., manufacture-dependent slot precision). For titanium brackets, resistance only increased after 60 s of polishing. For ceramic brackets, effective reduction was observed after 10 s of polishing. Polymer brackets, including the 3D-printed brackets, showed better sliding properties than ceramic or metal brackets even after polishing for 60 s. Removal of plaque and dental calculus should lead to a noticeable improvement of the sliding properties and outweighs structural defects that may develop. Springer Medizin 2021-09-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9958151/ /pubmed/34554279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00352-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Hodecker, Lutz
Bourauel, Christoph
Braumann, Bert
Kruse, Teresa
Christ, Hildegard
Scharf, Sven
Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials: In vitro analysis
title Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials: In vitro analysis
title_full Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials: In vitro analysis
title_fullStr Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials: In vitro analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials: In vitro analysis
title_short Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials: In vitro analysis
title_sort sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials: in vitro analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00352-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hodeckerlutz slidingbehaviourandsurfacequalityafterstaticairpolishingofconventionalandmodernbracketmaterialsinvitroanalysis
AT bourauelchristoph slidingbehaviourandsurfacequalityafterstaticairpolishingofconventionalandmodernbracketmaterialsinvitroanalysis
AT braumannbert slidingbehaviourandsurfacequalityafterstaticairpolishingofconventionalandmodernbracketmaterialsinvitroanalysis
AT kruseteresa slidingbehaviourandsurfacequalityafterstaticairpolishingofconventionalandmodernbracketmaterialsinvitroanalysis
AT christhildegard slidingbehaviourandsurfacequalityafterstaticairpolishingofconventionalandmodernbracketmaterialsinvitroanalysis
AT scharfsven slidingbehaviourandsurfacequalityafterstaticairpolishingofconventionalandmodernbracketmaterialsinvitroanalysis