Cargando…

Evaluation of the accuracy of established patient inspiratory effort estimation methods during mechanical support ventilation

There is a clinical need for monitoring inspiratory effort to prevent lung- and diaphragm injury in patients who receive supportive mechanical ventilation in an Intensive Care Unit. Different pressure-based techniques are available to estimate this inspiratory effort at the bedside, but the accuracy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Diepen, A., Bakkes, T.H.G.F., De Bie, A.J.R., Turco, S., Bouwman, R.A., Woerlee, P.H., Mischi, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13610
_version_ 1784894991512895488
author van Diepen, A.
Bakkes, T.H.G.F.
De Bie, A.J.R.
Turco, S.
Bouwman, R.A.
Woerlee, P.H.
Mischi, M.
author_facet van Diepen, A.
Bakkes, T.H.G.F.
De Bie, A.J.R.
Turco, S.
Bouwman, R.A.
Woerlee, P.H.
Mischi, M.
author_sort van Diepen, A.
collection PubMed
description There is a clinical need for monitoring inspiratory effort to prevent lung- and diaphragm injury in patients who receive supportive mechanical ventilation in an Intensive Care Unit. Different pressure-based techniques are available to estimate this inspiratory effort at the bedside, but the accuracy of their effort estimation is uncertain since they are all based on a simplified linear model of the respiratory system, which omits gas compressibility of air, and the viscoelasticity and nonlinearities of the respiratory system. The aim of this in-silico study was to provide an overview of the pressure-based estimation techniques and to evaluate their accuracy using a more sophisticated model of the respiratory system and ventilator. The influence of the following parameters on the accuracy of the pressure-based estimation techniques was evaluated using the in-silico model: 1) the patient's respiratory mechanics 2) PEEP and the inspiratory pressure of the ventilator 3) gas compressibility of air 4) viscoelasticity of the respiratory system 5) the strength of the inspiratory effort. The best-performing technique in terms of accuracy was the whole breath occlusion. The average error and maximum error were the lowest for all patient archetypes. We found that the error was related to the expansion of gas in the breathing set and lungs and respiratory compliance. However, concerns exist that other factors not included in the model, such as a changed muscle-force relation during an occlusion, might influence the true accuracy. The estimation techniques based on the esophageal pressure showed an error related to the viscoelastic element in the model which leads to a higher error than the occlusion. The error of the esophageal pressure-based techniques is therefore highly dependent on the pathology of the patient and the settings of the ventilator and might change over time while a patient recovers or becomes more ill.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9958297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99582972023-02-26 Evaluation of the accuracy of established patient inspiratory effort estimation methods during mechanical support ventilation van Diepen, A. Bakkes, T.H.G.F. De Bie, A.J.R. Turco, S. Bouwman, R.A. Woerlee, P.H. Mischi, M. Heliyon Research Article There is a clinical need for monitoring inspiratory effort to prevent lung- and diaphragm injury in patients who receive supportive mechanical ventilation in an Intensive Care Unit. Different pressure-based techniques are available to estimate this inspiratory effort at the bedside, but the accuracy of their effort estimation is uncertain since they are all based on a simplified linear model of the respiratory system, which omits gas compressibility of air, and the viscoelasticity and nonlinearities of the respiratory system. The aim of this in-silico study was to provide an overview of the pressure-based estimation techniques and to evaluate their accuracy using a more sophisticated model of the respiratory system and ventilator. The influence of the following parameters on the accuracy of the pressure-based estimation techniques was evaluated using the in-silico model: 1) the patient's respiratory mechanics 2) PEEP and the inspiratory pressure of the ventilator 3) gas compressibility of air 4) viscoelasticity of the respiratory system 5) the strength of the inspiratory effort. The best-performing technique in terms of accuracy was the whole breath occlusion. The average error and maximum error were the lowest for all patient archetypes. We found that the error was related to the expansion of gas in the breathing set and lungs and respiratory compliance. However, concerns exist that other factors not included in the model, such as a changed muscle-force relation during an occlusion, might influence the true accuracy. The estimation techniques based on the esophageal pressure showed an error related to the viscoelastic element in the model which leads to a higher error than the occlusion. The error of the esophageal pressure-based techniques is therefore highly dependent on the pathology of the patient and the settings of the ventilator and might change over time while a patient recovers or becomes more ill. Elsevier 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9958297/ /pubmed/36852019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13610 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
van Diepen, A.
Bakkes, T.H.G.F.
De Bie, A.J.R.
Turco, S.
Bouwman, R.A.
Woerlee, P.H.
Mischi, M.
Evaluation of the accuracy of established patient inspiratory effort estimation methods during mechanical support ventilation
title Evaluation of the accuracy of established patient inspiratory effort estimation methods during mechanical support ventilation
title_full Evaluation of the accuracy of established patient inspiratory effort estimation methods during mechanical support ventilation
title_fullStr Evaluation of the accuracy of established patient inspiratory effort estimation methods during mechanical support ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the accuracy of established patient inspiratory effort estimation methods during mechanical support ventilation
title_short Evaluation of the accuracy of established patient inspiratory effort estimation methods during mechanical support ventilation
title_sort evaluation of the accuracy of established patient inspiratory effort estimation methods during mechanical support ventilation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13610
work_keys_str_mv AT vandiepena evaluationoftheaccuracyofestablishedpatientinspiratoryeffortestimationmethodsduringmechanicalsupportventilation
AT bakkesthgf evaluationoftheaccuracyofestablishedpatientinspiratoryeffortestimationmethodsduringmechanicalsupportventilation
AT debieajr evaluationoftheaccuracyofestablishedpatientinspiratoryeffortestimationmethodsduringmechanicalsupportventilation
AT turcos evaluationoftheaccuracyofestablishedpatientinspiratoryeffortestimationmethodsduringmechanicalsupportventilation
AT bouwmanra evaluationoftheaccuracyofestablishedpatientinspiratoryeffortestimationmethodsduringmechanicalsupportventilation
AT woerleeph evaluationoftheaccuracyofestablishedpatientinspiratoryeffortestimationmethodsduringmechanicalsupportventilation
AT mischim evaluationoftheaccuracyofestablishedpatientinspiratoryeffortestimationmethodsduringmechanicalsupportventilation