Cargando…

Evaluation of Potentially Avoidable Acute Care Utilization Among Patients Insured by Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare

IMPORTANCE: Medicare Advantage plans have strong incentives to reduce potentially wasteful health care, including costly acute care visits for ambulatory care−sensitive conditions (ACSCs). However, it remains unknown whether Medicare Advantage plans lower acute care use compared with traditional Med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beckman, Adam L., Frakt, Austin B., Duggan, Ciara, Zheng, Jie, Orav, E. John, Tsai, Thomas C., Figueroa, Jose F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5530
_version_ 1784895045380341760
author Beckman, Adam L.
Frakt, Austin B.
Duggan, Ciara
Zheng, Jie
Orav, E. John
Tsai, Thomas C.
Figueroa, Jose F.
author_facet Beckman, Adam L.
Frakt, Austin B.
Duggan, Ciara
Zheng, Jie
Orav, E. John
Tsai, Thomas C.
Figueroa, Jose F.
author_sort Beckman, Adam L.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Medicare Advantage plans have strong incentives to reduce potentially wasteful health care, including costly acute care visits for ambulatory care−sensitive conditions (ACSCs). However, it remains unknown whether Medicare Advantage plans lower acute care use compared with traditional Medicare, or if it shifts patients from hospitalization to observation stays and emergency department (ED) direct discharges. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Medicare Advantage is associated with differential utilization of hospitalizations, observations, and ED direct discharges for ACSCs compared with traditional Medicare. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of US Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare beneficiaries from January 1 to December 31, 2018. Poisson regression models were used to compare risk-adjusted rates of Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare, controlling for patient demographic characteristics and clinical risk and including county fixed-effects. Data were analyzed between April 2021 and November 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospitalizations, observation stays, and ED direct discharges for ACSCs. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 2 665 340 Medicare Advantage patients (mean [SD] age, 72.7 [9.8] years; 1 504 519 [56.4%] women; 1 859 067 [69.7%] White individuals) and 7 981 547 traditional Medicare patients (mean [SD] age, 71.2 [11.8] years; 4 232 201 [53.0%] women; 6 176 239 [77.4%] White individuals). Medicare Advantage patients had lower risk of hospitalization for ACSCs compared with traditional Medicare patients (relative risk [RR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.93-0.95), primarily owing to fewer hospitalizations for acute conditions (eg, pneumonia). Medicare Advantage patients had a higher risk of ED direct discharges (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.43-1.45) and observation stays (RR, 2.38; 95% CI, 2.34-2.41) for ACSCs vs traditional Medicare patients. Overall, Medicare Advantage patients were at higher risk of needing care for an ACSC (hospitalization, ED direct discharge, or observation stay) than traditional Medicare patients (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.30-1.31). Within the Medicare Advantage population, patients in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) were at lower risk of ACSC-related hospitalization compared with patients in its preferred provider organizations (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98); however, those in the HMOs had a higher risk of ED direct discharge (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.07-1.09) and observation stay (overall RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this cross-sectional study of Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare patients with ACSCs indicate that apparent gains in lowering rates of potentially avoidable acute care have been associated with shifting inpatient care to settings such as ED direct discharges and observation stays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9958527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99585272023-02-26 Evaluation of Potentially Avoidable Acute Care Utilization Among Patients Insured by Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare Beckman, Adam L. Frakt, Austin B. Duggan, Ciara Zheng, Jie Orav, E. John Tsai, Thomas C. Figueroa, Jose F. JAMA Health Forum Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Medicare Advantage plans have strong incentives to reduce potentially wasteful health care, including costly acute care visits for ambulatory care−sensitive conditions (ACSCs). However, it remains unknown whether Medicare Advantage plans lower acute care use compared with traditional Medicare, or if it shifts patients from hospitalization to observation stays and emergency department (ED) direct discharges. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Medicare Advantage is associated with differential utilization of hospitalizations, observations, and ED direct discharges for ACSCs compared with traditional Medicare. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of US Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare beneficiaries from January 1 to December 31, 2018. Poisson regression models were used to compare risk-adjusted rates of Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare, controlling for patient demographic characteristics and clinical risk and including county fixed-effects. Data were analyzed between April 2021 and November 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospitalizations, observation stays, and ED direct discharges for ACSCs. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 2 665 340 Medicare Advantage patients (mean [SD] age, 72.7 [9.8] years; 1 504 519 [56.4%] women; 1 859 067 [69.7%] White individuals) and 7 981 547 traditional Medicare patients (mean [SD] age, 71.2 [11.8] years; 4 232 201 [53.0%] women; 6 176 239 [77.4%] White individuals). Medicare Advantage patients had lower risk of hospitalization for ACSCs compared with traditional Medicare patients (relative risk [RR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.93-0.95), primarily owing to fewer hospitalizations for acute conditions (eg, pneumonia). Medicare Advantage patients had a higher risk of ED direct discharges (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.43-1.45) and observation stays (RR, 2.38; 95% CI, 2.34-2.41) for ACSCs vs traditional Medicare patients. Overall, Medicare Advantage patients were at higher risk of needing care for an ACSC (hospitalization, ED direct discharge, or observation stay) than traditional Medicare patients (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.30-1.31). Within the Medicare Advantage population, patients in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) were at lower risk of ACSC-related hospitalization compared with patients in its preferred provider organizations (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98); however, those in the HMOs had a higher risk of ED direct discharge (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.07-1.09) and observation stay (overall RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this cross-sectional study of Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare patients with ACSCs indicate that apparent gains in lowering rates of potentially avoidable acute care have been associated with shifting inpatient care to settings such as ED direct discharges and observation stays. American Medical Association 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9958527/ /pubmed/36826828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5530 Text en Copyright 2023 Beckman AL et al. JAMA Health Forum. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Beckman, Adam L.
Frakt, Austin B.
Duggan, Ciara
Zheng, Jie
Orav, E. John
Tsai, Thomas C.
Figueroa, Jose F.
Evaluation of Potentially Avoidable Acute Care Utilization Among Patients Insured by Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare
title Evaluation of Potentially Avoidable Acute Care Utilization Among Patients Insured by Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare
title_full Evaluation of Potentially Avoidable Acute Care Utilization Among Patients Insured by Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare
title_fullStr Evaluation of Potentially Avoidable Acute Care Utilization Among Patients Insured by Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Potentially Avoidable Acute Care Utilization Among Patients Insured by Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare
title_short Evaluation of Potentially Avoidable Acute Care Utilization Among Patients Insured by Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare
title_sort evaluation of potentially avoidable acute care utilization among patients insured by medicare advantage vs traditional medicare
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5530
work_keys_str_mv AT beckmanadaml evaluationofpotentiallyavoidableacutecareutilizationamongpatientsinsuredbymedicareadvantagevstraditionalmedicare
AT fraktaustinb evaluationofpotentiallyavoidableacutecareutilizationamongpatientsinsuredbymedicareadvantagevstraditionalmedicare
AT dugganciara evaluationofpotentiallyavoidableacutecareutilizationamongpatientsinsuredbymedicareadvantagevstraditionalmedicare
AT zhengjie evaluationofpotentiallyavoidableacutecareutilizationamongpatientsinsuredbymedicareadvantagevstraditionalmedicare
AT oravejohn evaluationofpotentiallyavoidableacutecareutilizationamongpatientsinsuredbymedicareadvantagevstraditionalmedicare
AT tsaithomasc evaluationofpotentiallyavoidableacutecareutilizationamongpatientsinsuredbymedicareadvantagevstraditionalmedicare
AT figueroajosef evaluationofpotentiallyavoidableacutecareutilizationamongpatientsinsuredbymedicareadvantagevstraditionalmedicare