Cargando…

Adverse Reactions after BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Healthcare Workers Compared with Influenza Vaccination

This study aimed to compare adverse reactions following BNT162b2 and influenza vaccinations in healthcare workers. This study included healthcare workers who received the BNT162b2 vaccine and/or inactivated influenza vaccine, quadrivalent (IIV4), on 18–29 October 2021 at a tertiary hospital in Korea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, A-Sol, Kim, Sung-Min, Song, Ji-Eun, Hwang, Soyoon, Nam, Eunkyung, Kwon, Ki Tae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36851243
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020363
_version_ 1784895126610378752
author Kim, A-Sol
Kim, Sung-Min
Song, Ji-Eun
Hwang, Soyoon
Nam, Eunkyung
Kwon, Ki Tae
author_facet Kim, A-Sol
Kim, Sung-Min
Song, Ji-Eun
Hwang, Soyoon
Nam, Eunkyung
Kwon, Ki Tae
author_sort Kim, A-Sol
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare adverse reactions following BNT162b2 and influenza vaccinations in healthcare workers. This study included healthcare workers who received the BNT162b2 vaccine and/or inactivated influenza vaccine, quadrivalent (IIV4), on 18–29 October 2021 at a tertiary hospital in Korea. IIV4 was administered and BNT162b2 was subsequently administered one week later. The participants responded to a mobile questionnaire regarding adverse events. The overall adverse reaction rates were 90.6% in the BNT162b2 + IIV4 group, 90.4% in the BNT162b2 alone group, and 44.1% in the IIV4 alone group (p < 0.001). Fever occurred in 19.5%, 26.9%, and 3.3% of participants in the BNT162b2 + IIV4, BNT162b2 alone, and IIV4 alone groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The most common local and systemic adverse reactions were injection site pain (65.0%) and fatigue (58.6%), respectively. Injection-site pain was experienced by 88.7%, 88.5%, and 37.5% of the BNT162b2 + IIV4, BNT162b2 alone, and IIV4 alone groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Fatigue was experienced by 74.8%, 78.8%, and 38.6% of the BNT162b2 + IIV4, BNT162b2 alone, and IIV4 alone groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Adverse reactions occurred at a significantly higher frequency after BNT162b2 than after IIV4. The frequency of adverse reactions one week after vaccination with IIV4 and BNT162b2 was not different from that after vaccination with BNT162b2 alone. Therefore, coadministration of influenza vaccine with BNT162b2 can be expected to be safe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9958848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99588482023-02-26 Adverse Reactions after BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Healthcare Workers Compared with Influenza Vaccination Kim, A-Sol Kim, Sung-Min Song, Ji-Eun Hwang, Soyoon Nam, Eunkyung Kwon, Ki Tae Vaccines (Basel) Article This study aimed to compare adverse reactions following BNT162b2 and influenza vaccinations in healthcare workers. This study included healthcare workers who received the BNT162b2 vaccine and/or inactivated influenza vaccine, quadrivalent (IIV4), on 18–29 October 2021 at a tertiary hospital in Korea. IIV4 was administered and BNT162b2 was subsequently administered one week later. The participants responded to a mobile questionnaire regarding adverse events. The overall adverse reaction rates were 90.6% in the BNT162b2 + IIV4 group, 90.4% in the BNT162b2 alone group, and 44.1% in the IIV4 alone group (p < 0.001). Fever occurred in 19.5%, 26.9%, and 3.3% of participants in the BNT162b2 + IIV4, BNT162b2 alone, and IIV4 alone groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The most common local and systemic adverse reactions were injection site pain (65.0%) and fatigue (58.6%), respectively. Injection-site pain was experienced by 88.7%, 88.5%, and 37.5% of the BNT162b2 + IIV4, BNT162b2 alone, and IIV4 alone groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Fatigue was experienced by 74.8%, 78.8%, and 38.6% of the BNT162b2 + IIV4, BNT162b2 alone, and IIV4 alone groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Adverse reactions occurred at a significantly higher frequency after BNT162b2 than after IIV4. The frequency of adverse reactions one week after vaccination with IIV4 and BNT162b2 was not different from that after vaccination with BNT162b2 alone. Therefore, coadministration of influenza vaccine with BNT162b2 can be expected to be safe. MDPI 2023-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9958848/ /pubmed/36851243 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020363 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, A-Sol
Kim, Sung-Min
Song, Ji-Eun
Hwang, Soyoon
Nam, Eunkyung
Kwon, Ki Tae
Adverse Reactions after BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Healthcare Workers Compared with Influenza Vaccination
title Adverse Reactions after BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Healthcare Workers Compared with Influenza Vaccination
title_full Adverse Reactions after BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Healthcare Workers Compared with Influenza Vaccination
title_fullStr Adverse Reactions after BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Healthcare Workers Compared with Influenza Vaccination
title_full_unstemmed Adverse Reactions after BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Healthcare Workers Compared with Influenza Vaccination
title_short Adverse Reactions after BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Healthcare Workers Compared with Influenza Vaccination
title_sort adverse reactions after bnt162b2 messenger rna vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 in healthcare workers compared with influenza vaccination
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36851243
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020363
work_keys_str_mv AT kimasol adversereactionsafterbnt162b2messengerrnavaccinationforcoronavirusdisease2019inhealthcareworkerscomparedwithinfluenzavaccination
AT kimsungmin adversereactionsafterbnt162b2messengerrnavaccinationforcoronavirusdisease2019inhealthcareworkerscomparedwithinfluenzavaccination
AT songjieun adversereactionsafterbnt162b2messengerrnavaccinationforcoronavirusdisease2019inhealthcareworkerscomparedwithinfluenzavaccination
AT hwangsoyoon adversereactionsafterbnt162b2messengerrnavaccinationforcoronavirusdisease2019inhealthcareworkerscomparedwithinfluenzavaccination
AT nameunkyung adversereactionsafterbnt162b2messengerrnavaccinationforcoronavirusdisease2019inhealthcareworkerscomparedwithinfluenzavaccination
AT kwonkitae adversereactionsafterbnt162b2messengerrnavaccinationforcoronavirusdisease2019inhealthcareworkerscomparedwithinfluenzavaccination