Cargando…

Comparison of Serological Methods for Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus-Specific Antibody Detection in Wild Boar and Sheep: Impact of the Screening Approach on the Estimated Seroprevalence

Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is a flavivirus transmitted by ticks. Serological screenings in animals are performed to estimate the prevalence and distribution of TBEV. Most screenings consist of a primary screening by ELISA, followed by confirmation of positive samples by plaque reduction ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trozzi, Gabrielle, Adjadj, Nadjah Radia, Vervaeke, Muriel, Matthijs, Severine, Sohier, Charlotte, De Regge, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36851673
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15020459
_version_ 1784895129837895680
author Trozzi, Gabrielle
Adjadj, Nadjah Radia
Vervaeke, Muriel
Matthijs, Severine
Sohier, Charlotte
De Regge, Nick
author_facet Trozzi, Gabrielle
Adjadj, Nadjah Radia
Vervaeke, Muriel
Matthijs, Severine
Sohier, Charlotte
De Regge, Nick
author_sort Trozzi, Gabrielle
collection PubMed
description Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is a flavivirus transmitted by ticks. Serological screenings in animals are performed to estimate the prevalence and distribution of TBEV. Most screenings consist of a primary screening by ELISA, followed by confirmation of positive samples by plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNTs). In this study, 406 wild boar sera were tested with 2 regularly used commercial ELISAs for flavivirus screening in animals (Immunozym FSME (TBEV) IgG All Species (Progen) and ID Screen West Nile Competition (Innovative Diagnostics)) and PRNTs for TBEV and USUTU virus. The results showed that the Immunozym and IDScreen ELISAs had low relative sensitivities of 23% and 20%, respectively, compared to the PRNT results. The relative specificities were 88% and 84% due to cross reactions with USUTU virus-specific antibodies. The minimal TBEV prevalence in our sample set was 8.6% when determined by PRNT. When the screening approach of ELISA testing followed by PRNT confirmation was applied, a TBEV seroprevalence of only 2.0% and 1.7% was found. The suboptimal performance of the ELISAs was confirmed by testing sera collected from experimentally TBEV-infected sheep. While the PRNT detected TBEV specific antibodies in 94% of samples collected between 7 and 18 days post-infection, the ELISAs classified only 50% and 31% of the samples as positive. Both routinely used ELISAs for TBEV antibody screening in animal sera were shown to have a low sensitivity, potentially leading to an underestimation of the true prevalence, and furthermore cross-react with other flavivirus antibodies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9958861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99588612023-02-26 Comparison of Serological Methods for Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus-Specific Antibody Detection in Wild Boar and Sheep: Impact of the Screening Approach on the Estimated Seroprevalence Trozzi, Gabrielle Adjadj, Nadjah Radia Vervaeke, Muriel Matthijs, Severine Sohier, Charlotte De Regge, Nick Viruses Article Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is a flavivirus transmitted by ticks. Serological screenings in animals are performed to estimate the prevalence and distribution of TBEV. Most screenings consist of a primary screening by ELISA, followed by confirmation of positive samples by plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNTs). In this study, 406 wild boar sera were tested with 2 regularly used commercial ELISAs for flavivirus screening in animals (Immunozym FSME (TBEV) IgG All Species (Progen) and ID Screen West Nile Competition (Innovative Diagnostics)) and PRNTs for TBEV and USUTU virus. The results showed that the Immunozym and IDScreen ELISAs had low relative sensitivities of 23% and 20%, respectively, compared to the PRNT results. The relative specificities were 88% and 84% due to cross reactions with USUTU virus-specific antibodies. The minimal TBEV prevalence in our sample set was 8.6% when determined by PRNT. When the screening approach of ELISA testing followed by PRNT confirmation was applied, a TBEV seroprevalence of only 2.0% and 1.7% was found. The suboptimal performance of the ELISAs was confirmed by testing sera collected from experimentally TBEV-infected sheep. While the PRNT detected TBEV specific antibodies in 94% of samples collected between 7 and 18 days post-infection, the ELISAs classified only 50% and 31% of the samples as positive. Both routinely used ELISAs for TBEV antibody screening in animal sera were shown to have a low sensitivity, potentially leading to an underestimation of the true prevalence, and furthermore cross-react with other flavivirus antibodies. MDPI 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9958861/ /pubmed/36851673 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15020459 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Trozzi, Gabrielle
Adjadj, Nadjah Radia
Vervaeke, Muriel
Matthijs, Severine
Sohier, Charlotte
De Regge, Nick
Comparison of Serological Methods for Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus-Specific Antibody Detection in Wild Boar and Sheep: Impact of the Screening Approach on the Estimated Seroprevalence
title Comparison of Serological Methods for Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus-Specific Antibody Detection in Wild Boar and Sheep: Impact of the Screening Approach on the Estimated Seroprevalence
title_full Comparison of Serological Methods for Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus-Specific Antibody Detection in Wild Boar and Sheep: Impact of the Screening Approach on the Estimated Seroprevalence
title_fullStr Comparison of Serological Methods for Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus-Specific Antibody Detection in Wild Boar and Sheep: Impact of the Screening Approach on the Estimated Seroprevalence
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Serological Methods for Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus-Specific Antibody Detection in Wild Boar and Sheep: Impact of the Screening Approach on the Estimated Seroprevalence
title_short Comparison of Serological Methods for Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus-Specific Antibody Detection in Wild Boar and Sheep: Impact of the Screening Approach on the Estimated Seroprevalence
title_sort comparison of serological methods for tick-borne encephalitis virus-specific antibody detection in wild boar and sheep: impact of the screening approach on the estimated seroprevalence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36851673
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15020459
work_keys_str_mv AT trozzigabrielle comparisonofserologicalmethodsfortickborneencephalitisvirusspecificantibodydetectioninwildboarandsheepimpactofthescreeningapproachontheestimatedseroprevalence
AT adjadjnadjahradia comparisonofserologicalmethodsfortickborneencephalitisvirusspecificantibodydetectioninwildboarandsheepimpactofthescreeningapproachontheestimatedseroprevalence
AT vervaekemuriel comparisonofserologicalmethodsfortickborneencephalitisvirusspecificantibodydetectioninwildboarandsheepimpactofthescreeningapproachontheestimatedseroprevalence
AT matthijsseverine comparisonofserologicalmethodsfortickborneencephalitisvirusspecificantibodydetectioninwildboarandsheepimpactofthescreeningapproachontheestimatedseroprevalence
AT sohiercharlotte comparisonofserologicalmethodsfortickborneencephalitisvirusspecificantibodydetectioninwildboarandsheepimpactofthescreeningapproachontheestimatedseroprevalence
AT dereggenick comparisonofserologicalmethodsfortickborneencephalitisvirusspecificantibodydetectioninwildboarandsheepimpactofthescreeningapproachontheestimatedseroprevalence