Cargando…

Assessing Metabolic Markers in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a common and deadly brain tumor with late diagnoses and poor prognoses. Machine learning (ML) is an emerging tool that can create highly accurate diagnostic and prognostic prediction models. This paper aimed to systematically search the literature on ML for GBM metabolism and a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neil, Zachery D., Pierzchajlo, Noah, Boyett, Candler, Little, Olivia, Kuo, Cathleen C., Brown, Nolan J., Gendreau, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo13020161
_version_ 1784895135834701824
author Neil, Zachery D.
Pierzchajlo, Noah
Boyett, Candler
Little, Olivia
Kuo, Cathleen C.
Brown, Nolan J.
Gendreau, Julian
author_facet Neil, Zachery D.
Pierzchajlo, Noah
Boyett, Candler
Little, Olivia
Kuo, Cathleen C.
Brown, Nolan J.
Gendreau, Julian
author_sort Neil, Zachery D.
collection PubMed
description Glioblastoma (GBM) is a common and deadly brain tumor with late diagnoses and poor prognoses. Machine learning (ML) is an emerging tool that can create highly accurate diagnostic and prognostic prediction models. This paper aimed to systematically search the literature on ML for GBM metabolism and assess recent advancements. A literature search was performed using predetermined search terms. Articles describing the use of an ML algorithm for GBM metabolism were included. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis: diagnostic (n = 3, 30%), prognostic (n = 6, 60%), or both (n = 1, 10%). Most studies analyzed data from multiple databases, while 50% (n = 5) included additional original samples. At least 2536 data samples were run through an ML algorithm. Twenty-seven ML algorithms were recorded with a mean of 2.8 algorithms per study. Algorithms were supervised (n = 24, 89%), unsupervised (n = 3, 11%), continuous (n = 19, 70%), or categorical (n = 8, 30%). The mean reported accuracy and AUC of ROC were 95.63% and 0.779, respectively. One hundred six metabolic markers were identified, but only EMP3 was reported in multiple studies. Many studies have identified potential biomarkers for GBM diagnosis and prognostication. These algorithms show promise; however, a consensus on even a handful of biomarkers has not yet been made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9958885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99588852023-02-26 Assessing Metabolic Markers in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review Neil, Zachery D. Pierzchajlo, Noah Boyett, Candler Little, Olivia Kuo, Cathleen C. Brown, Nolan J. Gendreau, Julian Metabolites Systematic Review Glioblastoma (GBM) is a common and deadly brain tumor with late diagnoses and poor prognoses. Machine learning (ML) is an emerging tool that can create highly accurate diagnostic and prognostic prediction models. This paper aimed to systematically search the literature on ML for GBM metabolism and assess recent advancements. A literature search was performed using predetermined search terms. Articles describing the use of an ML algorithm for GBM metabolism were included. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis: diagnostic (n = 3, 30%), prognostic (n = 6, 60%), or both (n = 1, 10%). Most studies analyzed data from multiple databases, while 50% (n = 5) included additional original samples. At least 2536 data samples were run through an ML algorithm. Twenty-seven ML algorithms were recorded with a mean of 2.8 algorithms per study. Algorithms were supervised (n = 24, 89%), unsupervised (n = 3, 11%), continuous (n = 19, 70%), or categorical (n = 8, 30%). The mean reported accuracy and AUC of ROC were 95.63% and 0.779, respectively. One hundred six metabolic markers were identified, but only EMP3 was reported in multiple studies. Many studies have identified potential biomarkers for GBM diagnosis and prognostication. These algorithms show promise; however, a consensus on even a handful of biomarkers has not yet been made. MDPI 2023-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9958885/ /pubmed/36837779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo13020161 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Neil, Zachery D.
Pierzchajlo, Noah
Boyett, Candler
Little, Olivia
Kuo, Cathleen C.
Brown, Nolan J.
Gendreau, Julian
Assessing Metabolic Markers in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
title Assessing Metabolic Markers in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
title_full Assessing Metabolic Markers in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Assessing Metabolic Markers in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Metabolic Markers in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
title_short Assessing Metabolic Markers in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
title_sort assessing metabolic markers in glioblastoma using machine learning: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo13020161
work_keys_str_mv AT neilzacheryd assessingmetabolicmarkersinglioblastomausingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT pierzchajlonoah assessingmetabolicmarkersinglioblastomausingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT boyettcandler assessingmetabolicmarkersinglioblastomausingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT littleolivia assessingmetabolicmarkersinglioblastomausingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT kuocathleenc assessingmetabolicmarkersinglioblastomausingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT brownnolanj assessingmetabolicmarkersinglioblastomausingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT gendreaujulian assessingmetabolicmarkersinglioblastomausingmachinelearningasystematicreview