Cargando…
Evaluation of a Novel Ambient Light Survey Question in the Cancer Prevention Study-3
Nighttime light exposure may increase cancer risk by disrupting the circadian system. However, there is no well-established survey method for measuring ambient light. In the Cancer Prevention Study-3, 732 men and women answered a light survey based on seven environments. The light environment in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9959116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043658 |
_version_ | 1784895194064224256 |
---|---|
author | Diver, W. Ryan Figueiro, Mariana G. Rea, Mark S. Hodge, James M. Flanders, W. Dana Zhong, Charlie Patel, Alpa V. Gapstur, Susan M. |
author_facet | Diver, W. Ryan Figueiro, Mariana G. Rea, Mark S. Hodge, James M. Flanders, W. Dana Zhong, Charlie Patel, Alpa V. Gapstur, Susan M. |
author_sort | Diver, W. Ryan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nighttime light exposure may increase cancer risk by disrupting the circadian system. However, there is no well-established survey method for measuring ambient light. In the Cancer Prevention Study-3, 732 men and women answered a light survey based on seven environments. The light environment in the past year was assessed twice, one year apart, and four one-week diaries were collected between the annual surveys. A total of 170 participants wore a meter to measure photopic illuminance and circadian stimulus (CS). Illuminance and CS values were estimated for lighting environments from measured values and evaluated with a cross validation approach. The kappas for self-reported light environment comparing the two annual surveys were 0.61 on workdays and 0.49 on non-workdays. Kappas comparing the annual survey to weekly diaries were 0.71 and 0.57 for work and non-workdays, respectively. Agreement was highest for reporting of darkness (95.3%), non-residential light (86.5%), and household light (75.6%) on workdays. Measured illuminance and CS identified three peaks of light (darkness, indoor lighting, and outdoor daytime light). Estimated illuminance and CS were correlated with the measured values overall (r = 0.77 and r = 0.67, respectively) but were less correlated within each light environment (r = 0.23–0.43). The survey has good validity to assess ambient light for studies of human health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9959116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99591162023-02-26 Evaluation of a Novel Ambient Light Survey Question in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 Diver, W. Ryan Figueiro, Mariana G. Rea, Mark S. Hodge, James M. Flanders, W. Dana Zhong, Charlie Patel, Alpa V. Gapstur, Susan M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Nighttime light exposure may increase cancer risk by disrupting the circadian system. However, there is no well-established survey method for measuring ambient light. In the Cancer Prevention Study-3, 732 men and women answered a light survey based on seven environments. The light environment in the past year was assessed twice, one year apart, and four one-week diaries were collected between the annual surveys. A total of 170 participants wore a meter to measure photopic illuminance and circadian stimulus (CS). Illuminance and CS values were estimated for lighting environments from measured values and evaluated with a cross validation approach. The kappas for self-reported light environment comparing the two annual surveys were 0.61 on workdays and 0.49 on non-workdays. Kappas comparing the annual survey to weekly diaries were 0.71 and 0.57 for work and non-workdays, respectively. Agreement was highest for reporting of darkness (95.3%), non-residential light (86.5%), and household light (75.6%) on workdays. Measured illuminance and CS identified three peaks of light (darkness, indoor lighting, and outdoor daytime light). Estimated illuminance and CS were correlated with the measured values overall (r = 0.77 and r = 0.67, respectively) but were less correlated within each light environment (r = 0.23–0.43). The survey has good validity to assess ambient light for studies of human health. MDPI 2023-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9959116/ /pubmed/36834353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043658 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Diver, W. Ryan Figueiro, Mariana G. Rea, Mark S. Hodge, James M. Flanders, W. Dana Zhong, Charlie Patel, Alpa V. Gapstur, Susan M. Evaluation of a Novel Ambient Light Survey Question in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 |
title | Evaluation of a Novel Ambient Light Survey Question in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 |
title_full | Evaluation of a Novel Ambient Light Survey Question in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Novel Ambient Light Survey Question in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Novel Ambient Light Survey Question in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 |
title_short | Evaluation of a Novel Ambient Light Survey Question in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 |
title_sort | evaluation of a novel ambient light survey question in the cancer prevention study-3 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9959116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043658 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diverwryan evaluationofanovelambientlightsurveyquestioninthecancerpreventionstudy3 AT figueiromarianag evaluationofanovelambientlightsurveyquestioninthecancerpreventionstudy3 AT reamarks evaluationofanovelambientlightsurveyquestioninthecancerpreventionstudy3 AT hodgejamesm evaluationofanovelambientlightsurveyquestioninthecancerpreventionstudy3 AT flanderswdana evaluationofanovelambientlightsurveyquestioninthecancerpreventionstudy3 AT zhongcharlie evaluationofanovelambientlightsurveyquestioninthecancerpreventionstudy3 AT patelalpav evaluationofanovelambientlightsurveyquestioninthecancerpreventionstudy3 AT gapstursusanm evaluationofanovelambientlightsurveyquestioninthecancerpreventionstudy3 |