Cargando…

Brow and Eyelid Rejuvenation: Trends from the 100 Most Cited Articles over 30 Years

Background and Objective: Various periorbital rejuvenation techniques have been introduced over the last 3 decades. This study highlights important milestones in the evolution of periorbital rejuvenation surgery by identifying the 100 most-cited articles in this field. Material and Methods: The Web...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuruoglu, Doga, Salinas, Cristina A., Kirk, Daniel S., Wong, Chin-Ho, Sharaf, Basel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9959645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020230
_version_ 1784895328588136448
author Kuruoglu, Doga
Salinas, Cristina A.
Kirk, Daniel S.
Wong, Chin-Ho
Sharaf, Basel A.
author_facet Kuruoglu, Doga
Salinas, Cristina A.
Kirk, Daniel S.
Wong, Chin-Ho
Sharaf, Basel A.
author_sort Kuruoglu, Doga
collection PubMed
description Background and Objective: Various periorbital rejuvenation techniques have been introduced over the last 3 decades. This study highlights important milestones in the evolution of periorbital rejuvenation surgery by identifying the 100 most-cited articles in this field. Material and Methods: The Web of Science citation index was used to identify the 100 most-cited articles concerning periorbital rejuvenation. Articles published in English from January 1989–April 2020 describing periorbital rejuvenation-related surgical techniques, facial aging, and anatomy were included. The terms “lower blepharoplasty”, “upper blepharoplasty”, “browlift”, “browplasty”, “endobrow lift”, “endoscopic brow”, “Foreheadplasty”, “lower eyelid anatomy”, “upper eyelid anatomy”, “forehead lift”, “eyelid rejuvenation”, “canthopexy”, “canthoplasty”, “eyelid fat pad”, “orbital fat pad”, “tear trough”, and “eyelid bags” were entered into the citation search. Web of Science Core Collection was the database used for the search. A manual review of the initial 159 studies was performed. Articles describing reconstructive or non-invasive techniques, injectable fillers, lasers, and neurotoxins were excluded. Of the 100 most-cited articles, the publication year, specialty journal, the corresponding author’s primary specialty, the focus of the article, the corresponding author’s country of residence, the type of study, and the level of evidence were analyzed. Results: The mean number of citations per article was 75 ± 42. There were more articles published from 1989–1999 (n = 53) than later decades. Most articles originated from the USA (n = 82) and were published in plastic surgery journals (n = 81). Plastic surgery was the primary specialty of the corresponding authors (n = 71), followed by oculoplastic surgery (n = 22). Most articles (n = 69) reported on surgical techniques. Of the clinical studies (n = 69), 45 (79%) provided level IV evidence. Conclusions: Of the 100 most-cited studies on periorbital rejuvenation, studies focusing on periorbital anatomy, aging, and surgical techniques comprised the most-cited publications. An anatomically based approach accounting for age-related changes in the periorbital structures is paramount in the field of contemporary periorbital rejuvenation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9959645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99596452023-02-26 Brow and Eyelid Rejuvenation: Trends from the 100 Most Cited Articles over 30 Years Kuruoglu, Doga Salinas, Cristina A. Kirk, Daniel S. Wong, Chin-Ho Sharaf, Basel A. Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objective: Various periorbital rejuvenation techniques have been introduced over the last 3 decades. This study highlights important milestones in the evolution of periorbital rejuvenation surgery by identifying the 100 most-cited articles in this field. Material and Methods: The Web of Science citation index was used to identify the 100 most-cited articles concerning periorbital rejuvenation. Articles published in English from January 1989–April 2020 describing periorbital rejuvenation-related surgical techniques, facial aging, and anatomy were included. The terms “lower blepharoplasty”, “upper blepharoplasty”, “browlift”, “browplasty”, “endobrow lift”, “endoscopic brow”, “Foreheadplasty”, “lower eyelid anatomy”, “upper eyelid anatomy”, “forehead lift”, “eyelid rejuvenation”, “canthopexy”, “canthoplasty”, “eyelid fat pad”, “orbital fat pad”, “tear trough”, and “eyelid bags” were entered into the citation search. Web of Science Core Collection was the database used for the search. A manual review of the initial 159 studies was performed. Articles describing reconstructive or non-invasive techniques, injectable fillers, lasers, and neurotoxins were excluded. Of the 100 most-cited articles, the publication year, specialty journal, the corresponding author’s primary specialty, the focus of the article, the corresponding author’s country of residence, the type of study, and the level of evidence were analyzed. Results: The mean number of citations per article was 75 ± 42. There were more articles published from 1989–1999 (n = 53) than later decades. Most articles originated from the USA (n = 82) and were published in plastic surgery journals (n = 81). Plastic surgery was the primary specialty of the corresponding authors (n = 71), followed by oculoplastic surgery (n = 22). Most articles (n = 69) reported on surgical techniques. Of the clinical studies (n = 69), 45 (79%) provided level IV evidence. Conclusions: Of the 100 most-cited studies on periorbital rejuvenation, studies focusing on periorbital anatomy, aging, and surgical techniques comprised the most-cited publications. An anatomically based approach accounting for age-related changes in the periorbital structures is paramount in the field of contemporary periorbital rejuvenation. MDPI 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9959645/ /pubmed/36837432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020230 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kuruoglu, Doga
Salinas, Cristina A.
Kirk, Daniel S.
Wong, Chin-Ho
Sharaf, Basel A.
Brow and Eyelid Rejuvenation: Trends from the 100 Most Cited Articles over 30 Years
title Brow and Eyelid Rejuvenation: Trends from the 100 Most Cited Articles over 30 Years
title_full Brow and Eyelid Rejuvenation: Trends from the 100 Most Cited Articles over 30 Years
title_fullStr Brow and Eyelid Rejuvenation: Trends from the 100 Most Cited Articles over 30 Years
title_full_unstemmed Brow and Eyelid Rejuvenation: Trends from the 100 Most Cited Articles over 30 Years
title_short Brow and Eyelid Rejuvenation: Trends from the 100 Most Cited Articles over 30 Years
title_sort brow and eyelid rejuvenation: trends from the 100 most cited articles over 30 years
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9959645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020230
work_keys_str_mv AT kuruogludoga browandeyelidrejuvenationtrendsfromthe100mostcitedarticlesover30years
AT salinascristinaa browandeyelidrejuvenationtrendsfromthe100mostcitedarticlesover30years
AT kirkdaniels browandeyelidrejuvenationtrendsfromthe100mostcitedarticlesover30years
AT wongchinho browandeyelidrejuvenationtrendsfromthe100mostcitedarticlesover30years
AT sharafbasela browandeyelidrejuvenationtrendsfromthe100mostcitedarticlesover30years