Cargando…

Photobiomodulation with Blue Light on Wound Healing: A Scoping Review

Background: Photobiomodulation consists of inducing healing by irradiating light. This scoping review investigates the effect of blue light on the healing process. Methods: The MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched. Two reviewers independently examined the search result...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prado, Thais P., Zanchetta, Flávia Cristina, Barbieri, Beatriz, Aparecido, Caroline, Melo Lima, Maria Helena, Araujo, Eliana P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9959862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020575
_version_ 1784895383686610944
author Prado, Thais P.
Zanchetta, Flávia Cristina
Barbieri, Beatriz
Aparecido, Caroline
Melo Lima, Maria Helena
Araujo, Eliana P.
author_facet Prado, Thais P.
Zanchetta, Flávia Cristina
Barbieri, Beatriz
Aparecido, Caroline
Melo Lima, Maria Helena
Araujo, Eliana P.
author_sort Prado, Thais P.
collection PubMed
description Background: Photobiomodulation consists of inducing healing by irradiating light. This scoping review investigates the effect of blue light on the healing process. Methods: The MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched. Two reviewers independently examined the search results and extracted data from the included studies. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results: Twenty-two articles were included. Studies were categorized as in vitro/mixed, preclinical, and clinical. The power density used was 10–680 mW/cm(2) in most of the in vitro/preclinical studies, the irradiation time ranged from 5 s to 10 min, and different wavelengths and energy densities were used. In clinical studies, the wavelength ranged from 405 to 470 nm, and the energy density varied from 1.5 to 30 J/cm(2). Conclusions: A low energy density (<20 J/cm(2)) was able to stimulate the different cell types and proteins involved in healing, while a high energy density, 20.6–50 J/cm(2), significantly reduced cell proliferation, migration, and metabolism. There is a great variety of device parameters among studies, and this makes it difficult to conclude what the best technical specifications are. Thus, further studies should be performed in order to define the appropriate parameters of light to be used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9959862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99598622023-02-26 Photobiomodulation with Blue Light on Wound Healing: A Scoping Review Prado, Thais P. Zanchetta, Flávia Cristina Barbieri, Beatriz Aparecido, Caroline Melo Lima, Maria Helena Araujo, Eliana P. Life (Basel) Review Background: Photobiomodulation consists of inducing healing by irradiating light. This scoping review investigates the effect of blue light on the healing process. Methods: The MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched. Two reviewers independently examined the search results and extracted data from the included studies. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results: Twenty-two articles were included. Studies were categorized as in vitro/mixed, preclinical, and clinical. The power density used was 10–680 mW/cm(2) in most of the in vitro/preclinical studies, the irradiation time ranged from 5 s to 10 min, and different wavelengths and energy densities were used. In clinical studies, the wavelength ranged from 405 to 470 nm, and the energy density varied from 1.5 to 30 J/cm(2). Conclusions: A low energy density (<20 J/cm(2)) was able to stimulate the different cell types and proteins involved in healing, while a high energy density, 20.6–50 J/cm(2), significantly reduced cell proliferation, migration, and metabolism. There is a great variety of device parameters among studies, and this makes it difficult to conclude what the best technical specifications are. Thus, further studies should be performed in order to define the appropriate parameters of light to be used. MDPI 2023-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9959862/ /pubmed/36836932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020575 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Prado, Thais P.
Zanchetta, Flávia Cristina
Barbieri, Beatriz
Aparecido, Caroline
Melo Lima, Maria Helena
Araujo, Eliana P.
Photobiomodulation with Blue Light on Wound Healing: A Scoping Review
title Photobiomodulation with Blue Light on Wound Healing: A Scoping Review
title_full Photobiomodulation with Blue Light on Wound Healing: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Photobiomodulation with Blue Light on Wound Healing: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Photobiomodulation with Blue Light on Wound Healing: A Scoping Review
title_short Photobiomodulation with Blue Light on Wound Healing: A Scoping Review
title_sort photobiomodulation with blue light on wound healing: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9959862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020575
work_keys_str_mv AT pradothaisp photobiomodulationwithbluelightonwoundhealingascopingreview
AT zanchettaflaviacristina photobiomodulationwithbluelightonwoundhealingascopingreview
AT barbieribeatriz photobiomodulationwithbluelightonwoundhealingascopingreview
AT aparecidocaroline photobiomodulationwithbluelightonwoundhealingascopingreview
AT melolimamariahelena photobiomodulationwithbluelightonwoundhealingascopingreview
AT araujoelianap photobiomodulationwithbluelightonwoundhealingascopingreview