Cargando…

Evaluation of a Medical Grade Thermoplastic Polyurethane for the Manufacture of an Implantable Medical Device: The Impact of FDM 3D-Printing and Gamma Sterilization

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) is gaining interest in the medical industry thanks to the combination of tunable properties that TPU exhibits and the possibilities that 3DP processes offer concerning precision, time, and cost of fabrication. We investigated the i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: M’Bengue, Marie-Stella, Mesnard, Thomas, Chai, Feng, Maton, Mickaël, Gaucher, Valérie, Tabary, Nicolas, García-Fernandez, Maria-José, Sobocinski, Jonathan, Martel, Bernard, Blanchemain, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36839778
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020456
_version_ 1784895554649587712
author M’Bengue, Marie-Stella
Mesnard, Thomas
Chai, Feng
Maton, Mickaël
Gaucher, Valérie
Tabary, Nicolas
García-Fernandez, Maria-José
Sobocinski, Jonathan
Martel, Bernard
Blanchemain, Nicolas
author_facet M’Bengue, Marie-Stella
Mesnard, Thomas
Chai, Feng
Maton, Mickaël
Gaucher, Valérie
Tabary, Nicolas
García-Fernandez, Maria-José
Sobocinski, Jonathan
Martel, Bernard
Blanchemain, Nicolas
author_sort M’Bengue, Marie-Stella
collection PubMed
description Three-dimensional printing (3DP) of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) is gaining interest in the medical industry thanks to the combination of tunable properties that TPU exhibits and the possibilities that 3DP processes offer concerning precision, time, and cost of fabrication. We investigated the implementation of a medical grade TPU by fused deposition modelling (FDM) for the manufacturing of an implantable medical device from the raw pellets to the gamma (γ) sterilized 3DP constructs. To the authors’ knowledge, there is no such guide/study implicating TPU, FDM 3D-printing and gamma sterilization. Thermal properties analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and molecular weights measured by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) were used as monitoring indicators through the fabrication process. After gamma sterilization, surface chemistry was assessed by water contact angle (WCA) measurement and infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). Mechanical properties were investigated by tensile testing. Biocompatibility was assessed by means of cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5) and hemocompatibility assays (ISO 10993-4). Results showed that TPU underwent degradation through the fabrication process as both the number-averaged (Mn) and weight-averaged (Mw) molecular weights decreased (7% Mn loss, 30% Mw loss, p < 0.05). After gamma sterilization, Mw increased by 8% (p < 0.05) indicating that crosslinking may have occurred. However, tensile properties were not impacted by irradiation. Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5) and hemocompatibility (ISO 10993-4) assessments after sterilization showed vitality of cells (132% ± 3%, p < 0.05) and no red blood cell lysis. We concluded that gamma sterilization does not highly impact TPU regarding our application. Our study demonstrates the processability of TPU by FDM followed by gamma sterilization and can be used as a guide for the preliminary evaluation of a polymeric raw material in the manufacturing of a blood contacting implantable medical device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9960613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99606132023-02-26 Evaluation of a Medical Grade Thermoplastic Polyurethane for the Manufacture of an Implantable Medical Device: The Impact of FDM 3D-Printing and Gamma Sterilization M’Bengue, Marie-Stella Mesnard, Thomas Chai, Feng Maton, Mickaël Gaucher, Valérie Tabary, Nicolas García-Fernandez, Maria-José Sobocinski, Jonathan Martel, Bernard Blanchemain, Nicolas Pharmaceutics Article Three-dimensional printing (3DP) of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) is gaining interest in the medical industry thanks to the combination of tunable properties that TPU exhibits and the possibilities that 3DP processes offer concerning precision, time, and cost of fabrication. We investigated the implementation of a medical grade TPU by fused deposition modelling (FDM) for the manufacturing of an implantable medical device from the raw pellets to the gamma (γ) sterilized 3DP constructs. To the authors’ knowledge, there is no such guide/study implicating TPU, FDM 3D-printing and gamma sterilization. Thermal properties analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and molecular weights measured by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) were used as monitoring indicators through the fabrication process. After gamma sterilization, surface chemistry was assessed by water contact angle (WCA) measurement and infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). Mechanical properties were investigated by tensile testing. Biocompatibility was assessed by means of cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5) and hemocompatibility assays (ISO 10993-4). Results showed that TPU underwent degradation through the fabrication process as both the number-averaged (Mn) and weight-averaged (Mw) molecular weights decreased (7% Mn loss, 30% Mw loss, p < 0.05). After gamma sterilization, Mw increased by 8% (p < 0.05) indicating that crosslinking may have occurred. However, tensile properties were not impacted by irradiation. Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5) and hemocompatibility (ISO 10993-4) assessments after sterilization showed vitality of cells (132% ± 3%, p < 0.05) and no red blood cell lysis. We concluded that gamma sterilization does not highly impact TPU regarding our application. Our study demonstrates the processability of TPU by FDM followed by gamma sterilization and can be used as a guide for the preliminary evaluation of a polymeric raw material in the manufacturing of a blood contacting implantable medical device. MDPI 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9960613/ /pubmed/36839778 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020456 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
M’Bengue, Marie-Stella
Mesnard, Thomas
Chai, Feng
Maton, Mickaël
Gaucher, Valérie
Tabary, Nicolas
García-Fernandez, Maria-José
Sobocinski, Jonathan
Martel, Bernard
Blanchemain, Nicolas
Evaluation of a Medical Grade Thermoplastic Polyurethane for the Manufacture of an Implantable Medical Device: The Impact of FDM 3D-Printing and Gamma Sterilization
title Evaluation of a Medical Grade Thermoplastic Polyurethane for the Manufacture of an Implantable Medical Device: The Impact of FDM 3D-Printing and Gamma Sterilization
title_full Evaluation of a Medical Grade Thermoplastic Polyurethane for the Manufacture of an Implantable Medical Device: The Impact of FDM 3D-Printing and Gamma Sterilization
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Medical Grade Thermoplastic Polyurethane for the Manufacture of an Implantable Medical Device: The Impact of FDM 3D-Printing and Gamma Sterilization
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Medical Grade Thermoplastic Polyurethane for the Manufacture of an Implantable Medical Device: The Impact of FDM 3D-Printing and Gamma Sterilization
title_short Evaluation of a Medical Grade Thermoplastic Polyurethane for the Manufacture of an Implantable Medical Device: The Impact of FDM 3D-Printing and Gamma Sterilization
title_sort evaluation of a medical grade thermoplastic polyurethane for the manufacture of an implantable medical device: the impact of fdm 3d-printing and gamma sterilization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36839778
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020456
work_keys_str_mv AT mbenguemariestella evaluationofamedicalgradethermoplasticpolyurethaneforthemanufactureofanimplantablemedicaldevicetheimpactoffdm3dprintingandgammasterilization
AT mesnardthomas evaluationofamedicalgradethermoplasticpolyurethaneforthemanufactureofanimplantablemedicaldevicetheimpactoffdm3dprintingandgammasterilization
AT chaifeng evaluationofamedicalgradethermoplasticpolyurethaneforthemanufactureofanimplantablemedicaldevicetheimpactoffdm3dprintingandgammasterilization
AT matonmickael evaluationofamedicalgradethermoplasticpolyurethaneforthemanufactureofanimplantablemedicaldevicetheimpactoffdm3dprintingandgammasterilization
AT gauchervalerie evaluationofamedicalgradethermoplasticpolyurethaneforthemanufactureofanimplantablemedicaldevicetheimpactoffdm3dprintingandgammasterilization
AT tabarynicolas evaluationofamedicalgradethermoplasticpolyurethaneforthemanufactureofanimplantablemedicaldevicetheimpactoffdm3dprintingandgammasterilization
AT garciafernandezmariajose evaluationofamedicalgradethermoplasticpolyurethaneforthemanufactureofanimplantablemedicaldevicetheimpactoffdm3dprintingandgammasterilization
AT sobocinskijonathan evaluationofamedicalgradethermoplasticpolyurethaneforthemanufactureofanimplantablemedicaldevicetheimpactoffdm3dprintingandgammasterilization
AT martelbernard evaluationofamedicalgradethermoplasticpolyurethaneforthemanufactureofanimplantablemedicaldevicetheimpactoffdm3dprintingandgammasterilization
AT blanchemainnicolas evaluationofamedicalgradethermoplasticpolyurethaneforthemanufactureofanimplantablemedicaldevicetheimpactoffdm3dprintingandgammasterilization