Cargando…
Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery. METHODS: Patients with endometriosis who were admitted to our hospital from December 2020 to March 2022 were randomly collected. A total of 81 patients were collected and divided into 40 cases in the control grou...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02118-w |
_version_ | 1784895569903222784 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Mingjun Yang, Wenhui Zhang, Haiyan |
author_facet | Tang, Mingjun Yang, Wenhui Zhang, Haiyan |
author_sort | Tang, Mingjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery. METHODS: Patients with endometriosis who were admitted to our hospital from December 2020 to March 2022 were randomly collected. A total of 81 patients were collected and divided into 40 cases in the control group and 41 cases in the observation group. Among them, the control group was treated with GnRH-a drug, and the observation group was treated with dienogest (DNG). RESULTS: The study found that the therapeutic effects of the two drugs were basically the same in patients with endometriosis. The VAS and Kupperman scores of the control group were 0.78 ± 0.8, 3.9 ± 1.84, P < 0.05, respectively; the VAS and Kupperman scores of the observation group were 0.73 ± 0.78, 1.55, respectively ± 1.24, P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant.In the case of postoperative recurrence, the observation group was better than the control group, with 8 cases of recurrence in the control group and 2 cases of recurrence in the observation group, P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: In the comparison of postoperative efficacy of the two drugs on patients with endometriosis, dienogest is better than GnRH-a adjuvant drug in postoperative recurrence, and has a good improvement and application, which is worthy of further promotion in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9960682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99606822023-02-26 Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery Tang, Mingjun Yang, Wenhui Zhang, Haiyan BMC Womens Health Research OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery. METHODS: Patients with endometriosis who were admitted to our hospital from December 2020 to March 2022 were randomly collected. A total of 81 patients were collected and divided into 40 cases in the control group and 41 cases in the observation group. Among them, the control group was treated with GnRH-a drug, and the observation group was treated with dienogest (DNG). RESULTS: The study found that the therapeutic effects of the two drugs were basically the same in patients with endometriosis. The VAS and Kupperman scores of the control group were 0.78 ± 0.8, 3.9 ± 1.84, P < 0.05, respectively; the VAS and Kupperman scores of the observation group were 0.73 ± 0.78, 1.55, respectively ± 1.24, P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant.In the case of postoperative recurrence, the observation group was better than the control group, with 8 cases of recurrence in the control group and 2 cases of recurrence in the observation group, P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: In the comparison of postoperative efficacy of the two drugs on patients with endometriosis, dienogest is better than GnRH-a adjuvant drug in postoperative recurrence, and has a good improvement and application, which is worthy of further promotion in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9960682/ /pubmed/36829198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02118-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tang, Mingjun Yang, Wenhui Zhang, Haiyan Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery |
title | Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery |
title_full | Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery |
title_short | Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and gnrh-a after endometriosis surgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02118-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangmingjun comparisonoftheefficacyofdienogestandgnrhaafterendometriosissurgery AT yangwenhui comparisonoftheefficacyofdienogestandgnrhaafterendometriosissurgery AT zhanghaiyan comparisonoftheefficacyofdienogestandgnrhaafterendometriosissurgery |