Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery. METHODS: Patients with endometriosis who were admitted to our hospital from December 2020 to March 2022 were randomly collected. A total of 81 patients were collected and divided into 40 cases in the control grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Mingjun, Yang, Wenhui, Zhang, Haiyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02118-w
_version_ 1784895569903222784
author Tang, Mingjun
Yang, Wenhui
Zhang, Haiyan
author_facet Tang, Mingjun
Yang, Wenhui
Zhang, Haiyan
author_sort Tang, Mingjun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery. METHODS: Patients with endometriosis who were admitted to our hospital from December 2020 to March 2022 were randomly collected. A total of 81 patients were collected and divided into 40 cases in the control group and 41 cases in the observation group. Among them, the control group was treated with GnRH-a drug, and the observation group was treated with dienogest (DNG). RESULTS: The study found that the therapeutic effects of the two drugs were basically the same in patients with endometriosis. The VAS and Kupperman scores of the control group were 0.78 ± 0.8, 3.9 ± 1.84, P < 0.05, respectively; the VAS and Kupperman scores of the observation group were 0.73 ± 0.78, 1.55, respectively ± 1.24, P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant.In the case of postoperative recurrence, the observation group was better than the control group, with 8 cases of recurrence in the control group and 2 cases of recurrence in the observation group, P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: In the comparison of postoperative efficacy of the two drugs on patients with endometriosis, dienogest is better than GnRH-a adjuvant drug in postoperative recurrence, and has a good improvement and application, which is worthy of further promotion in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9960682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99606822023-02-26 Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery Tang, Mingjun Yang, Wenhui Zhang, Haiyan BMC Womens Health Research OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery. METHODS: Patients with endometriosis who were admitted to our hospital from December 2020 to March 2022 were randomly collected. A total of 81 patients were collected and divided into 40 cases in the control group and 41 cases in the observation group. Among them, the control group was treated with GnRH-a drug, and the observation group was treated with dienogest (DNG). RESULTS: The study found that the therapeutic effects of the two drugs were basically the same in patients with endometriosis. The VAS and Kupperman scores of the control group were 0.78 ± 0.8, 3.9 ± 1.84, P < 0.05, respectively; the VAS and Kupperman scores of the observation group were 0.73 ± 0.78, 1.55, respectively ± 1.24, P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant.In the case of postoperative recurrence, the observation group was better than the control group, with 8 cases of recurrence in the control group and 2 cases of recurrence in the observation group, P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: In the comparison of postoperative efficacy of the two drugs on patients with endometriosis, dienogest is better than GnRH-a adjuvant drug in postoperative recurrence, and has a good improvement and application, which is worthy of further promotion in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9960682/ /pubmed/36829198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02118-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tang, Mingjun
Yang, Wenhui
Zhang, Haiyan
Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery
title Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery
title_full Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery
title_short Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and gnrh-a after endometriosis surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02118-w
work_keys_str_mv AT tangmingjun comparisonoftheefficacyofdienogestandgnrhaafterendometriosissurgery
AT yangwenhui comparisonoftheefficacyofdienogestandgnrhaafterendometriosissurgery
AT zhanghaiyan comparisonoftheefficacyofdienogestandgnrhaafterendometriosissurgery