Cargando…
Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review
Organ-sparing combined-modality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer remains underutilized despite high-quality evidence regarding its efficacy, safety, and preservation of quality of life. It may be offered to patients unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy, as well as those unfit for neoa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041560 |
_version_ | 1784895584650395648 |
---|---|
author | Lemiński, Artur Michalski, Wojciech Masojć, Bartłomiej Kaczmarek, Krystian Małkiewicz, Bartosz Kienitz, Jakub Zawisza-Lemińska, Barbara Falco, Michał Słojewski, Marcin |
author_facet | Lemiński, Artur Michalski, Wojciech Masojć, Bartłomiej Kaczmarek, Krystian Małkiewicz, Bartosz Kienitz, Jakub Zawisza-Lemińska, Barbara Falco, Michał Słojewski, Marcin |
author_sort | Lemiński, Artur |
collection | PubMed |
description | Organ-sparing combined-modality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer remains underutilized despite high-quality evidence regarding its efficacy, safety, and preservation of quality of life. It may be offered to patients unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy, as well as those unfit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. The treatment plan should be tailored to each patient’s characteristics, with more intensive protocols offered to patients who are fit for surgery but opt for organ-sparing. After a thorough, debulking transurethral resection of the tumor and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the response evaluation should trigger further management with either chemoradiation or early cystectomy in non-responders. A hypofractionated, continuous radiotherapy regimen of 55 Gy in 20 fractions with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C is currently preferred based on clinical trials. The response should be evaluated with repeated transurethral resections of the tumor bed and abdominopelvic-computed tomography after chemoradiation, with quarterly assessments during the first year. Salvage cystectomy should be offered to patients fit for surgery who failed to respond to treatment or developed a muscle-invasive recurrence. Non-muscle-invasive bladder recurrences and upper tract tumors should be treated in line with guidelines for respective primary tumors. Multiparametric magnetic resonance can be used for tumor staging and response monitoring, as it may distinguish disease recurrence from treatment-induced inflammation and fibrosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9960746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99607462023-02-26 Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review Lemiński, Artur Michalski, Wojciech Masojć, Bartłomiej Kaczmarek, Krystian Małkiewicz, Bartosz Kienitz, Jakub Zawisza-Lemińska, Barbara Falco, Michał Słojewski, Marcin J Clin Med Review Organ-sparing combined-modality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer remains underutilized despite high-quality evidence regarding its efficacy, safety, and preservation of quality of life. It may be offered to patients unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy, as well as those unfit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. The treatment plan should be tailored to each patient’s characteristics, with more intensive protocols offered to patients who are fit for surgery but opt for organ-sparing. After a thorough, debulking transurethral resection of the tumor and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the response evaluation should trigger further management with either chemoradiation or early cystectomy in non-responders. A hypofractionated, continuous radiotherapy regimen of 55 Gy in 20 fractions with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C is currently preferred based on clinical trials. The response should be evaluated with repeated transurethral resections of the tumor bed and abdominopelvic-computed tomography after chemoradiation, with quarterly assessments during the first year. Salvage cystectomy should be offered to patients fit for surgery who failed to respond to treatment or developed a muscle-invasive recurrence. Non-muscle-invasive bladder recurrences and upper tract tumors should be treated in line with guidelines for respective primary tumors. Multiparametric magnetic resonance can be used for tumor staging and response monitoring, as it may distinguish disease recurrence from treatment-induced inflammation and fibrosis. MDPI 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9960746/ /pubmed/36836093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041560 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Lemiński, Artur Michalski, Wojciech Masojć, Bartłomiej Kaczmarek, Krystian Małkiewicz, Bartosz Kienitz, Jakub Zawisza-Lemińska, Barbara Falco, Michał Słojewski, Marcin Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review |
title | Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review |
title_full | Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review |
title_short | Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review |
title_sort | combined modality bladder-sparing therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: how (should) we do it? a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leminskiartur combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview AT michalskiwojciech combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview AT masojcbartłomiej combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview AT kaczmarekkrystian combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview AT małkiewiczbartosz combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview AT kienitzjakub combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview AT zawiszaleminskabarbara combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview AT falcomichał combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview AT słojewskimarcin combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview |