Cargando…

Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review

Organ-sparing combined-modality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer remains underutilized despite high-quality evidence regarding its efficacy, safety, and preservation of quality of life. It may be offered to patients unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy, as well as those unfit for neoa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lemiński, Artur, Michalski, Wojciech, Masojć, Bartłomiej, Kaczmarek, Krystian, Małkiewicz, Bartosz, Kienitz, Jakub, Zawisza-Lemińska, Barbara, Falco, Michał, Słojewski, Marcin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041560
_version_ 1784895584650395648
author Lemiński, Artur
Michalski, Wojciech
Masojć, Bartłomiej
Kaczmarek, Krystian
Małkiewicz, Bartosz
Kienitz, Jakub
Zawisza-Lemińska, Barbara
Falco, Michał
Słojewski, Marcin
author_facet Lemiński, Artur
Michalski, Wojciech
Masojć, Bartłomiej
Kaczmarek, Krystian
Małkiewicz, Bartosz
Kienitz, Jakub
Zawisza-Lemińska, Barbara
Falco, Michał
Słojewski, Marcin
author_sort Lemiński, Artur
collection PubMed
description Organ-sparing combined-modality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer remains underutilized despite high-quality evidence regarding its efficacy, safety, and preservation of quality of life. It may be offered to patients unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy, as well as those unfit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. The treatment plan should be tailored to each patient’s characteristics, with more intensive protocols offered to patients who are fit for surgery but opt for organ-sparing. After a thorough, debulking transurethral resection of the tumor and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the response evaluation should trigger further management with either chemoradiation or early cystectomy in non-responders. A hypofractionated, continuous radiotherapy regimen of 55 Gy in 20 fractions with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C is currently preferred based on clinical trials. The response should be evaluated with repeated transurethral resections of the tumor bed and abdominopelvic-computed tomography after chemoradiation, with quarterly assessments during the first year. Salvage cystectomy should be offered to patients fit for surgery who failed to respond to treatment or developed a muscle-invasive recurrence. Non-muscle-invasive bladder recurrences and upper tract tumors should be treated in line with guidelines for respective primary tumors. Multiparametric magnetic resonance can be used for tumor staging and response monitoring, as it may distinguish disease recurrence from treatment-induced inflammation and fibrosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9960746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99607462023-02-26 Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review Lemiński, Artur Michalski, Wojciech Masojć, Bartłomiej Kaczmarek, Krystian Małkiewicz, Bartosz Kienitz, Jakub Zawisza-Lemińska, Barbara Falco, Michał Słojewski, Marcin J Clin Med Review Organ-sparing combined-modality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer remains underutilized despite high-quality evidence regarding its efficacy, safety, and preservation of quality of life. It may be offered to patients unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy, as well as those unfit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. The treatment plan should be tailored to each patient’s characteristics, with more intensive protocols offered to patients who are fit for surgery but opt for organ-sparing. After a thorough, debulking transurethral resection of the tumor and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the response evaluation should trigger further management with either chemoradiation or early cystectomy in non-responders. A hypofractionated, continuous radiotherapy regimen of 55 Gy in 20 fractions with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C is currently preferred based on clinical trials. The response should be evaluated with repeated transurethral resections of the tumor bed and abdominopelvic-computed tomography after chemoradiation, with quarterly assessments during the first year. Salvage cystectomy should be offered to patients fit for surgery who failed to respond to treatment or developed a muscle-invasive recurrence. Non-muscle-invasive bladder recurrences and upper tract tumors should be treated in line with guidelines for respective primary tumors. Multiparametric magnetic resonance can be used for tumor staging and response monitoring, as it may distinguish disease recurrence from treatment-induced inflammation and fibrosis. MDPI 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9960746/ /pubmed/36836093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041560 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Lemiński, Artur
Michalski, Wojciech
Masojć, Bartłomiej
Kaczmarek, Krystian
Małkiewicz, Bartosz
Kienitz, Jakub
Zawisza-Lemińska, Barbara
Falco, Michał
Słojewski, Marcin
Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review
title Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review
title_full Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review
title_short Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review
title_sort combined modality bladder-sparing therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: how (should) we do it? a narrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041560
work_keys_str_mv AT leminskiartur combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview
AT michalskiwojciech combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview
AT masojcbartłomiej combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview
AT kaczmarekkrystian combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview
AT małkiewiczbartosz combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview
AT kienitzjakub combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview
AT zawiszaleminskabarbara combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview
AT falcomichał combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview
AT słojewskimarcin combinedmodalitybladdersparingtherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancerhowshouldwedoitanarrativereview