Cargando…
Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of Horse Gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) Genotypes for Horse Gram Yellow Mosaic Virus Resistance
Horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) is an under-utilized legume grown in India. It is a good source of protein, carbohydrates, dietary fiber, minerals, and vitamins. We screened 252 horse gram germplasm accessions for horse gram yellow mosaic virus resistance using the percent disease i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo13020165 |
_version_ | 1784895586576629760 |
---|---|
author | Rajaprakasam, Sudhagar Shanmugavel, Priyanka Chockalingam, Vanniarajan Jegadeesan, Souframanien Latha, Tnpalayam Krishnaswamy Sukirtha Ananthan, Saravanan Naaganoor Muthurajan, Raveendran Kanagarajan, Selvaraju |
author_facet | Rajaprakasam, Sudhagar Shanmugavel, Priyanka Chockalingam, Vanniarajan Jegadeesan, Souframanien Latha, Tnpalayam Krishnaswamy Sukirtha Ananthan, Saravanan Naaganoor Muthurajan, Raveendran Kanagarajan, Selvaraju |
author_sort | Rajaprakasam, Sudhagar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) is an under-utilized legume grown in India. It is a good source of protein, carbohydrates, dietary fiber, minerals, and vitamins. We screened 252 horse gram germplasm accessions for horse gram yellow mosaic virus resistance using the percent disease index and scaling techniques. The percentage values of highly resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, susceptible, and highly susceptible were 0.34, 13.89, 38.89, 46.43, and 0.34, respectively. Repetitive trials confirmed the host-plant resistance levels, and yield loss was assessed. The present disease index ranged from 1.2 to 72.0 and 1.2 to 73.0 during the kharif and rabi seasons of 2018, respectively. The maximum percent yield loss was noticed in the HS (75.0 –89.4), while HR possessed the minimum (1.2–2.0). The methanolic leaf extracts of highly resistant and highly susceptible genotypes with essential controls were subjected to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis. Differential accumulation of metabolites was noticed, and a total of 81 metabolites representing 26 functional groups were identified. Both highly resistant and susceptible genotypes harbored eight unique classes, while ten biomolecules were common. The hierarchical cluster analysis indicated a distinct metabolite profile. Fold change in the common metabolites revealed an enhanced accumulation of sugars, alkanes, and carboxylic acids in the highly resistant genotype. The principal component analysis plots explained 93.7% of the variation. The metabolite profile showed a significant accumulation of three anti-viral (octadecanoic acid, diphenyl sulfone, and 2-Aminooxazole), one insecticidal (9,10-Secocholesta-5,7,10(19)-triene-3,24,25-triol), one antifeedant (cucurbitacin B), and six metabolites with unknown biological function in the highly resistant genotype. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9960754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99607542023-02-26 Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of Horse Gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) Genotypes for Horse Gram Yellow Mosaic Virus Resistance Rajaprakasam, Sudhagar Shanmugavel, Priyanka Chockalingam, Vanniarajan Jegadeesan, Souframanien Latha, Tnpalayam Krishnaswamy Sukirtha Ananthan, Saravanan Naaganoor Muthurajan, Raveendran Kanagarajan, Selvaraju Metabolites Article Horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) is an under-utilized legume grown in India. It is a good source of protein, carbohydrates, dietary fiber, minerals, and vitamins. We screened 252 horse gram germplasm accessions for horse gram yellow mosaic virus resistance using the percent disease index and scaling techniques. The percentage values of highly resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, susceptible, and highly susceptible were 0.34, 13.89, 38.89, 46.43, and 0.34, respectively. Repetitive trials confirmed the host-plant resistance levels, and yield loss was assessed. The present disease index ranged from 1.2 to 72.0 and 1.2 to 73.0 during the kharif and rabi seasons of 2018, respectively. The maximum percent yield loss was noticed in the HS (75.0 –89.4), while HR possessed the minimum (1.2–2.0). The methanolic leaf extracts of highly resistant and highly susceptible genotypes with essential controls were subjected to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis. Differential accumulation of metabolites was noticed, and a total of 81 metabolites representing 26 functional groups were identified. Both highly resistant and susceptible genotypes harbored eight unique classes, while ten biomolecules were common. The hierarchical cluster analysis indicated a distinct metabolite profile. Fold change in the common metabolites revealed an enhanced accumulation of sugars, alkanes, and carboxylic acids in the highly resistant genotype. The principal component analysis plots explained 93.7% of the variation. The metabolite profile showed a significant accumulation of three anti-viral (octadecanoic acid, diphenyl sulfone, and 2-Aminooxazole), one insecticidal (9,10-Secocholesta-5,7,10(19)-triene-3,24,25-triol), one antifeedant (cucurbitacin B), and six metabolites with unknown biological function in the highly resistant genotype. MDPI 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9960754/ /pubmed/36837784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo13020165 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rajaprakasam, Sudhagar Shanmugavel, Priyanka Chockalingam, Vanniarajan Jegadeesan, Souframanien Latha, Tnpalayam Krishnaswamy Sukirtha Ananthan, Saravanan Naaganoor Muthurajan, Raveendran Kanagarajan, Selvaraju Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of Horse Gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) Genotypes for Horse Gram Yellow Mosaic Virus Resistance |
title | Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of Horse Gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) Genotypes for Horse Gram Yellow Mosaic Virus Resistance |
title_full | Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of Horse Gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) Genotypes for Horse Gram Yellow Mosaic Virus Resistance |
title_fullStr | Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of Horse Gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) Genotypes for Horse Gram Yellow Mosaic Virus Resistance |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of Horse Gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) Genotypes for Horse Gram Yellow Mosaic Virus Resistance |
title_short | Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of Horse Gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) Genotypes for Horse Gram Yellow Mosaic Virus Resistance |
title_sort | comparative metabolomic profiling of horse gram (macrotyloma uniflorum (lam.) verdc.) genotypes for horse gram yellow mosaic virus resistance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo13020165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajaprakasamsudhagar comparativemetabolomicprofilingofhorsegrammacrotylomauniflorumlamverdcgenotypesforhorsegramyellowmosaicvirusresistance AT shanmugavelpriyanka comparativemetabolomicprofilingofhorsegrammacrotylomauniflorumlamverdcgenotypesforhorsegramyellowmosaicvirusresistance AT chockalingamvanniarajan comparativemetabolomicprofilingofhorsegrammacrotylomauniflorumlamverdcgenotypesforhorsegramyellowmosaicvirusresistance AT jegadeesansouframanien comparativemetabolomicprofilingofhorsegrammacrotylomauniflorumlamverdcgenotypesforhorsegramyellowmosaicvirusresistance AT lathatnpalayamkrishnaswamysukirtha comparativemetabolomicprofilingofhorsegrammacrotylomauniflorumlamverdcgenotypesforhorsegramyellowmosaicvirusresistance AT ananthansaravanannaaganoor comparativemetabolomicprofilingofhorsegrammacrotylomauniflorumlamverdcgenotypesforhorsegramyellowmosaicvirusresistance AT muthurajanraveendran comparativemetabolomicprofilingofhorsegrammacrotylomauniflorumlamverdcgenotypesforhorsegramyellowmosaicvirusresistance AT kanagarajanselvaraju comparativemetabolomicprofilingofhorsegrammacrotylomauniflorumlamverdcgenotypesforhorsegramyellowmosaicvirusresistance |