Cargando…

Cost–Benefit of Real-Time Multiplex PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 in German Hospitals

Background: The current Omicron COVID-19 pandemic has significant morbidity worldwide. Objective: Assess the cost–benefit relation of implementing PCR point-of-care (POCT) COVID-19 testing in the emergency rooms (ERs) of German hospitals and in the case of inpatient admission due to other acute illn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diel, Roland, Nienhaus, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043447
_version_ 1784895592195948544
author Diel, Roland
Nienhaus, Albert
author_facet Diel, Roland
Nienhaus, Albert
author_sort Diel, Roland
collection PubMed
description Background: The current Omicron COVID-19 pandemic has significant morbidity worldwide. Objective: Assess the cost–benefit relation of implementing PCR point-of-care (POCT) COVID-19 testing in the emergency rooms (ERs) of German hospitals and in the case of inpatient admission due to other acute illnesses. Methods: A deterministic decision-analytic model simulated the incremental costs of using the Savanna(®) Multiplex RT-PCR test compared to using clinical judgement alone to confirm or exclude COVID-19 in adult patients in German ERs prior to hospitalization or just prior to discharge. Direct and indirect costs were evaluated from the hospital perspective. Nasal or nasopharyngeal swabs of patients suspected to have COVID-19 by clinical judgement, but without POCT, were sent to external labs for RT-PCR testing. Results: In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, assuming a COVID-19 prevalence ranging between 15.6–41.2% and a hospitalization rate between 4.3–64.3%, implementing the Savanna(®) test saved, on average, €107 as compared to applying the clinical-judgement-only strategy. A revenue loss of €735 can be avoided when SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients coming unplanned to the hospital due to other acute illnesses are excluded immediately by POCT. Conclusions: Using highly sensitive and specific PCR-POCT in patients suspected of COVID-19 infection at German ERs may significantly reduce hospital expenditures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9960777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99607772023-02-26 Cost–Benefit of Real-Time Multiplex PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 in German Hospitals Diel, Roland Nienhaus, Albert Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The current Omicron COVID-19 pandemic has significant morbidity worldwide. Objective: Assess the cost–benefit relation of implementing PCR point-of-care (POCT) COVID-19 testing in the emergency rooms (ERs) of German hospitals and in the case of inpatient admission due to other acute illnesses. Methods: A deterministic decision-analytic model simulated the incremental costs of using the Savanna(®) Multiplex RT-PCR test compared to using clinical judgement alone to confirm or exclude COVID-19 in adult patients in German ERs prior to hospitalization or just prior to discharge. Direct and indirect costs were evaluated from the hospital perspective. Nasal or nasopharyngeal swabs of patients suspected to have COVID-19 by clinical judgement, but without POCT, were sent to external labs for RT-PCR testing. Results: In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, assuming a COVID-19 prevalence ranging between 15.6–41.2% and a hospitalization rate between 4.3–64.3%, implementing the Savanna(®) test saved, on average, €107 as compared to applying the clinical-judgement-only strategy. A revenue loss of €735 can be avoided when SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients coming unplanned to the hospital due to other acute illnesses are excluded immediately by POCT. Conclusions: Using highly sensitive and specific PCR-POCT in patients suspected of COVID-19 infection at German ERs may significantly reduce hospital expenditures. MDPI 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9960777/ /pubmed/36834141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043447 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Diel, Roland
Nienhaus, Albert
Cost–Benefit of Real-Time Multiplex PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 in German Hospitals
title Cost–Benefit of Real-Time Multiplex PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 in German Hospitals
title_full Cost–Benefit of Real-Time Multiplex PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 in German Hospitals
title_fullStr Cost–Benefit of Real-Time Multiplex PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 in German Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Cost–Benefit of Real-Time Multiplex PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 in German Hospitals
title_short Cost–Benefit of Real-Time Multiplex PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 in German Hospitals
title_sort cost–benefit of real-time multiplex pcr testing of sars-cov-2 in german hospitals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9960777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043447
work_keys_str_mv AT dielroland costbenefitofrealtimemultiplexpcrtestingofsarscov2ingermanhospitals
AT nienhausalbert costbenefitofrealtimemultiplexpcrtestingofsarscov2ingermanhospitals