Cargando…

Manipulating the Rapid Consolidation Periods in a Learning Task Affects General Skills More than Statistical Learning and Changes the Dynamics of Learning

Memory consolidation processes have traditionally been investigated from the perspective of hours or days. However, recent developments in memory research have shown that memory consolidation processes could occur even within seconds, possibly because of the neural replay of just practiced memory tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szücs-Bencze, Laura, Fanuel, Lison, Szabó, Nikoletta, Quentin, Romain, Nemeth, Dezso, Vékony, Teodóra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9961365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36792360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0228-22.2022
_version_ 1784895736360468480
author Szücs-Bencze, Laura
Fanuel, Lison
Szabó, Nikoletta
Quentin, Romain
Nemeth, Dezso
Vékony, Teodóra
author_facet Szücs-Bencze, Laura
Fanuel, Lison
Szabó, Nikoletta
Quentin, Romain
Nemeth, Dezso
Vékony, Teodóra
author_sort Szücs-Bencze, Laura
collection PubMed
description Memory consolidation processes have traditionally been investigated from the perspective of hours or days. However, recent developments in memory research have shown that memory consolidation processes could occur even within seconds, possibly because of the neural replay of just practiced memory traces during short breaks. Here, we investigate this rapid form of consolidation during statistical learning. We aim to answer (1) whether this rapid consolidation occurs in implicit statistical learning and general skill learning, and (2) whether the duration of rest periods affects these two learning types differently. Human participants performed a widely used statistical learning task—the alternating serial reaction time (ASRT) task—that enables us to measure implicit statistical and general skill learning separately. The ASRT task consisted of 25 learning blocks with a rest period between the blocks. In a between-subjects design, the length of the rest periods was fixed at 15 or 30 s, or the participants could control the length themselves. We found that the duration of rest periods does not affect the amount of statistical knowledge acquired but does change the dynamics of learning. Shorter rest periods led to better learning during the learning blocks, whereas longer rest periods promoted learning also in the between-block rest periods, possibly because of the higher amount of replay. Moreover, we found weaker general skill learning in the self-paced group than in the fixed rest period groups. These results suggest that distinct learning processes are differently affected by the duration of short rest periods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9961365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99613652023-02-26 Manipulating the Rapid Consolidation Periods in a Learning Task Affects General Skills More than Statistical Learning and Changes the Dynamics of Learning Szücs-Bencze, Laura Fanuel, Lison Szabó, Nikoletta Quentin, Romain Nemeth, Dezso Vékony, Teodóra eNeuro Research Article: Confirmation Memory consolidation processes have traditionally been investigated from the perspective of hours or days. However, recent developments in memory research have shown that memory consolidation processes could occur even within seconds, possibly because of the neural replay of just practiced memory traces during short breaks. Here, we investigate this rapid form of consolidation during statistical learning. We aim to answer (1) whether this rapid consolidation occurs in implicit statistical learning and general skill learning, and (2) whether the duration of rest periods affects these two learning types differently. Human participants performed a widely used statistical learning task—the alternating serial reaction time (ASRT) task—that enables us to measure implicit statistical and general skill learning separately. The ASRT task consisted of 25 learning blocks with a rest period between the blocks. In a between-subjects design, the length of the rest periods was fixed at 15 or 30 s, or the participants could control the length themselves. We found that the duration of rest periods does not affect the amount of statistical knowledge acquired but does change the dynamics of learning. Shorter rest periods led to better learning during the learning blocks, whereas longer rest periods promoted learning also in the between-block rest periods, possibly because of the higher amount of replay. Moreover, we found weaker general skill learning in the self-paced group than in the fixed rest period groups. These results suggest that distinct learning processes are differently affected by the duration of short rest periods. Society for Neuroscience 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9961365/ /pubmed/36792360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0228-22.2022 Text en Copyright © 2023 Szücs-Bencze et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article: Confirmation
Szücs-Bencze, Laura
Fanuel, Lison
Szabó, Nikoletta
Quentin, Romain
Nemeth, Dezso
Vékony, Teodóra
Manipulating the Rapid Consolidation Periods in a Learning Task Affects General Skills More than Statistical Learning and Changes the Dynamics of Learning
title Manipulating the Rapid Consolidation Periods in a Learning Task Affects General Skills More than Statistical Learning and Changes the Dynamics of Learning
title_full Manipulating the Rapid Consolidation Periods in a Learning Task Affects General Skills More than Statistical Learning and Changes the Dynamics of Learning
title_fullStr Manipulating the Rapid Consolidation Periods in a Learning Task Affects General Skills More than Statistical Learning and Changes the Dynamics of Learning
title_full_unstemmed Manipulating the Rapid Consolidation Periods in a Learning Task Affects General Skills More than Statistical Learning and Changes the Dynamics of Learning
title_short Manipulating the Rapid Consolidation Periods in a Learning Task Affects General Skills More than Statistical Learning and Changes the Dynamics of Learning
title_sort manipulating the rapid consolidation periods in a learning task affects general skills more than statistical learning and changes the dynamics of learning
topic Research Article: Confirmation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9961365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36792360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0228-22.2022
work_keys_str_mv AT szucsbenczelaura manipulatingtherapidconsolidationperiodsinalearningtaskaffectsgeneralskillsmorethanstatisticallearningandchangesthedynamicsoflearning
AT fanuellison manipulatingtherapidconsolidationperiodsinalearningtaskaffectsgeneralskillsmorethanstatisticallearningandchangesthedynamicsoflearning
AT szabonikoletta manipulatingtherapidconsolidationperiodsinalearningtaskaffectsgeneralskillsmorethanstatisticallearningandchangesthedynamicsoflearning
AT quentinromain manipulatingtherapidconsolidationperiodsinalearningtaskaffectsgeneralskillsmorethanstatisticallearningandchangesthedynamicsoflearning
AT nemethdezso manipulatingtherapidconsolidationperiodsinalearningtaskaffectsgeneralskillsmorethanstatisticallearningandchangesthedynamicsoflearning
AT vekonyteodora manipulatingtherapidconsolidationperiodsinalearningtaskaffectsgeneralskillsmorethanstatisticallearningandchangesthedynamicsoflearning