Cargando…
Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses
Until a few years ago, many studies focused on the transcriptomic response to single stresses. However, tomato cultivations are often constrained by a wide range of biotic and abiotic stress that can occur singularly or in combination, and several genes can be involved in the defensive mechanism res...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9961515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36835470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24044061 |
_version_ | 1784895773713891328 |
---|---|
author | Amoroso, Ciro Gianmaria D’Esposito, Daniela Aiese Cigliano, Riccardo Ercolano, Maria Raffaella |
author_facet | Amoroso, Ciro Gianmaria D’Esposito, Daniela Aiese Cigliano, Riccardo Ercolano, Maria Raffaella |
author_sort | Amoroso, Ciro Gianmaria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Until a few years ago, many studies focused on the transcriptomic response to single stresses. However, tomato cultivations are often constrained by a wide range of biotic and abiotic stress that can occur singularly or in combination, and several genes can be involved in the defensive mechanism response. Therefore, we analyzed and compared the transcriptomic responses of resistant and susceptible genotypes to seven biotic stresses (Cladosporium fulvum, Phytophthora infestans, Pseudomonas syringae, Ralstonia solanacearum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) and Tuta absoluta) and five abiotic stresses (drought, salinity, low temperatures, and oxidative stress) to identify genes involved in response to multiple stressors. With this approach, we found genes encoding for TFs, phytohormones, or participating in signaling and cell wall metabolic processes, participating in defense against various biotic and abiotic stress. Moreover, a total of 1474 DEGs were commonly found between biotic and abiotic stress. Among these, 67 DEGs were involved in response to at least four different stresses. In particular, we found RLKs, MAPKs, Fasciclin-like arabinogalactans (FLAs), glycosyltransferases, genes involved in the auxin, ET, and JA pathways, MYBs, bZIPs, WRKYs and ERFs genes. Detected genes responsive to multiple stress might be further investigated with biotechnological approaches to effectively improve plant tolerance in the field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9961515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99615152023-02-26 Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses Amoroso, Ciro Gianmaria D’Esposito, Daniela Aiese Cigliano, Riccardo Ercolano, Maria Raffaella Int J Mol Sci Article Until a few years ago, many studies focused on the transcriptomic response to single stresses. However, tomato cultivations are often constrained by a wide range of biotic and abiotic stress that can occur singularly or in combination, and several genes can be involved in the defensive mechanism response. Therefore, we analyzed and compared the transcriptomic responses of resistant and susceptible genotypes to seven biotic stresses (Cladosporium fulvum, Phytophthora infestans, Pseudomonas syringae, Ralstonia solanacearum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) and Tuta absoluta) and five abiotic stresses (drought, salinity, low temperatures, and oxidative stress) to identify genes involved in response to multiple stressors. With this approach, we found genes encoding for TFs, phytohormones, or participating in signaling and cell wall metabolic processes, participating in defense against various biotic and abiotic stress. Moreover, a total of 1474 DEGs were commonly found between biotic and abiotic stress. Among these, 67 DEGs were involved in response to at least four different stresses. In particular, we found RLKs, MAPKs, Fasciclin-like arabinogalactans (FLAs), glycosyltransferases, genes involved in the auxin, ET, and JA pathways, MYBs, bZIPs, WRKYs and ERFs genes. Detected genes responsive to multiple stress might be further investigated with biotechnological approaches to effectively improve plant tolerance in the field. MDPI 2023-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9961515/ /pubmed/36835470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24044061 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Amoroso, Ciro Gianmaria D’Esposito, Daniela Aiese Cigliano, Riccardo Ercolano, Maria Raffaella Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses |
title | Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses |
title_full | Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses |
title_short | Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses |
title_sort | comparison of tomato transcriptomic profiles reveals overlapping patterns in abiotic and biotic stress responses |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9961515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36835470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24044061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amorosocirogianmaria comparisonoftomatotranscriptomicprofilesrevealsoverlappingpatternsinabioticandbioticstressresponses AT despositodaniela comparisonoftomatotranscriptomicprofilesrevealsoverlappingpatternsinabioticandbioticstressresponses AT aieseciglianoriccardo comparisonoftomatotranscriptomicprofilesrevealsoverlappingpatternsinabioticandbioticstressresponses AT ercolanomariaraffaella comparisonoftomatotranscriptomicprofilesrevealsoverlappingpatternsinabioticandbioticstressresponses |