Cargando…

Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses

Until a few years ago, many studies focused on the transcriptomic response to single stresses. However, tomato cultivations are often constrained by a wide range of biotic and abiotic stress that can occur singularly or in combination, and several genes can be involved in the defensive mechanism res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amoroso, Ciro Gianmaria, D’Esposito, Daniela, Aiese Cigliano, Riccardo, Ercolano, Maria Raffaella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9961515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36835470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24044061
_version_ 1784895773713891328
author Amoroso, Ciro Gianmaria
D’Esposito, Daniela
Aiese Cigliano, Riccardo
Ercolano, Maria Raffaella
author_facet Amoroso, Ciro Gianmaria
D’Esposito, Daniela
Aiese Cigliano, Riccardo
Ercolano, Maria Raffaella
author_sort Amoroso, Ciro Gianmaria
collection PubMed
description Until a few years ago, many studies focused on the transcriptomic response to single stresses. However, tomato cultivations are often constrained by a wide range of biotic and abiotic stress that can occur singularly or in combination, and several genes can be involved in the defensive mechanism response. Therefore, we analyzed and compared the transcriptomic responses of resistant and susceptible genotypes to seven biotic stresses (Cladosporium fulvum, Phytophthora infestans, Pseudomonas syringae, Ralstonia solanacearum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) and Tuta absoluta) and five abiotic stresses (drought, salinity, low temperatures, and oxidative stress) to identify genes involved in response to multiple stressors. With this approach, we found genes encoding for TFs, phytohormones, or participating in signaling and cell wall metabolic processes, participating in defense against various biotic and abiotic stress. Moreover, a total of 1474 DEGs were commonly found between biotic and abiotic stress. Among these, 67 DEGs were involved in response to at least four different stresses. In particular, we found RLKs, MAPKs, Fasciclin-like arabinogalactans (FLAs), glycosyltransferases, genes involved in the auxin, ET, and JA pathways, MYBs, bZIPs, WRKYs and ERFs genes. Detected genes responsive to multiple stress might be further investigated with biotechnological approaches to effectively improve plant tolerance in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9961515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99615152023-02-26 Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses Amoroso, Ciro Gianmaria D’Esposito, Daniela Aiese Cigliano, Riccardo Ercolano, Maria Raffaella Int J Mol Sci Article Until a few years ago, many studies focused on the transcriptomic response to single stresses. However, tomato cultivations are often constrained by a wide range of biotic and abiotic stress that can occur singularly or in combination, and several genes can be involved in the defensive mechanism response. Therefore, we analyzed and compared the transcriptomic responses of resistant and susceptible genotypes to seven biotic stresses (Cladosporium fulvum, Phytophthora infestans, Pseudomonas syringae, Ralstonia solanacearum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) and Tuta absoluta) and five abiotic stresses (drought, salinity, low temperatures, and oxidative stress) to identify genes involved in response to multiple stressors. With this approach, we found genes encoding for TFs, phytohormones, or participating in signaling and cell wall metabolic processes, participating in defense against various biotic and abiotic stress. Moreover, a total of 1474 DEGs were commonly found between biotic and abiotic stress. Among these, 67 DEGs were involved in response to at least four different stresses. In particular, we found RLKs, MAPKs, Fasciclin-like arabinogalactans (FLAs), glycosyltransferases, genes involved in the auxin, ET, and JA pathways, MYBs, bZIPs, WRKYs and ERFs genes. Detected genes responsive to multiple stress might be further investigated with biotechnological approaches to effectively improve plant tolerance in the field. MDPI 2023-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9961515/ /pubmed/36835470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24044061 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Amoroso, Ciro Gianmaria
D’Esposito, Daniela
Aiese Cigliano, Riccardo
Ercolano, Maria Raffaella
Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses
title Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses
title_full Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses
title_fullStr Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses
title_short Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses
title_sort comparison of tomato transcriptomic profiles reveals overlapping patterns in abiotic and biotic stress responses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9961515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36835470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24044061
work_keys_str_mv AT amorosocirogianmaria comparisonoftomatotranscriptomicprofilesrevealsoverlappingpatternsinabioticandbioticstressresponses
AT despositodaniela comparisonoftomatotranscriptomicprofilesrevealsoverlappingpatternsinabioticandbioticstressresponses
AT aieseciglianoriccardo comparisonoftomatotranscriptomicprofilesrevealsoverlappingpatternsinabioticandbioticstressresponses
AT ercolanomariaraffaella comparisonoftomatotranscriptomicprofilesrevealsoverlappingpatternsinabioticandbioticstressresponses