Cargando…

Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens

Pigs are a reservoir of hepatitis E virus (HEV), which causes hepatitis in humans. To study the epidemiology of HEV in pig farms, sampling methods are currently used that cause discomfort to pigs, such as rectal sampling. In line with the 3Rs principle, we aimed to evaluate non-invasive methods to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meester, Marina, Rademaker, Aniek, Bouwknegt, Martijn, Hakze-van der Honing, Renate W., Stegeman, Arjan, van der Poel, Wim H. M., Tobias, Tijs J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36838465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020500
_version_ 1784895924800061440
author Meester, Marina
Rademaker, Aniek
Bouwknegt, Martijn
Hakze-van der Honing, Renate W.
Stegeman, Arjan
van der Poel, Wim H. M.
Tobias, Tijs J.
author_facet Meester, Marina
Rademaker, Aniek
Bouwknegt, Martijn
Hakze-van der Honing, Renate W.
Stegeman, Arjan
van der Poel, Wim H. M.
Tobias, Tijs J.
author_sort Meester, Marina
collection PubMed
description Pigs are a reservoir of hepatitis E virus (HEV), which causes hepatitis in humans. To study the epidemiology of HEV in pig farms, sampling methods are currently used that cause discomfort to pigs, such as rectal sampling. In line with the 3Rs principle, we aimed to evaluate non-invasive methods to detect pens with HEV-shedding pigs. Twenty-eight pens of one farm were sampled cross-sectionally. Individual rectal swabs (IRS) were collected to determine prevalence within pens. Four pen-level samples were compared: a pool of IRS per pen (P), boot socks (BS), oral fluid (OF) and pooled faecal droppings (FD). Each sample was tested by RT-PCR and the sensitivity and specificity of each method was determined by Bayesian latent class analysis. According to IRS, 19/28 pens were HEV positive. BS had a sensitivity of 95% and detected HEV in pens with 10% of pigs shedding; however, specificity was below 30%. FD were comparably accurate to P, with a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 86%, respectively. BS sampling is thus advised to detect early shedding of HEV or pen contamination, and FD to determine the duration of shedding. This study demonstrates that non-invasive sampling can replace rectal swabs in research on HEV in pigs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9962119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99621192023-02-26 Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens Meester, Marina Rademaker, Aniek Bouwknegt, Martijn Hakze-van der Honing, Renate W. Stegeman, Arjan van der Poel, Wim H. M. Tobias, Tijs J. Microorganisms Article Pigs are a reservoir of hepatitis E virus (HEV), which causes hepatitis in humans. To study the epidemiology of HEV in pig farms, sampling methods are currently used that cause discomfort to pigs, such as rectal sampling. In line with the 3Rs principle, we aimed to evaluate non-invasive methods to detect pens with HEV-shedding pigs. Twenty-eight pens of one farm were sampled cross-sectionally. Individual rectal swabs (IRS) were collected to determine prevalence within pens. Four pen-level samples were compared: a pool of IRS per pen (P), boot socks (BS), oral fluid (OF) and pooled faecal droppings (FD). Each sample was tested by RT-PCR and the sensitivity and specificity of each method was determined by Bayesian latent class analysis. According to IRS, 19/28 pens were HEV positive. BS had a sensitivity of 95% and detected HEV in pens with 10% of pigs shedding; however, specificity was below 30%. FD were comparably accurate to P, with a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 86%, respectively. BS sampling is thus advised to detect early shedding of HEV or pen contamination, and FD to determine the duration of shedding. This study demonstrates that non-invasive sampling can replace rectal swabs in research on HEV in pigs. MDPI 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9962119/ /pubmed/36838465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020500 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Meester, Marina
Rademaker, Aniek
Bouwknegt, Martijn
Hakze-van der Honing, Renate W.
Stegeman, Arjan
van der Poel, Wim H. M.
Tobias, Tijs J.
Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens
title Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens
title_full Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens
title_fullStr Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens
title_short Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens
title_sort evaluation of non-invasive sampling methods for detection of hepatitis e virus infected pigs in pens
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36838465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020500
work_keys_str_mv AT meestermarina evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens
AT rademakeraniek evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens
AT bouwknegtmartijn evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens
AT hakzevanderhoningrenatew evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens
AT stegemanarjan evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens
AT vanderpoelwimhm evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens
AT tobiastijsj evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens