Cargando…
Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens
Pigs are a reservoir of hepatitis E virus (HEV), which causes hepatitis in humans. To study the epidemiology of HEV in pig farms, sampling methods are currently used that cause discomfort to pigs, such as rectal sampling. In line with the 3Rs principle, we aimed to evaluate non-invasive methods to d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36838465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020500 |
_version_ | 1784895924800061440 |
---|---|
author | Meester, Marina Rademaker, Aniek Bouwknegt, Martijn Hakze-van der Honing, Renate W. Stegeman, Arjan van der Poel, Wim H. M. Tobias, Tijs J. |
author_facet | Meester, Marina Rademaker, Aniek Bouwknegt, Martijn Hakze-van der Honing, Renate W. Stegeman, Arjan van der Poel, Wim H. M. Tobias, Tijs J. |
author_sort | Meester, Marina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pigs are a reservoir of hepatitis E virus (HEV), which causes hepatitis in humans. To study the epidemiology of HEV in pig farms, sampling methods are currently used that cause discomfort to pigs, such as rectal sampling. In line with the 3Rs principle, we aimed to evaluate non-invasive methods to detect pens with HEV-shedding pigs. Twenty-eight pens of one farm were sampled cross-sectionally. Individual rectal swabs (IRS) were collected to determine prevalence within pens. Four pen-level samples were compared: a pool of IRS per pen (P), boot socks (BS), oral fluid (OF) and pooled faecal droppings (FD). Each sample was tested by RT-PCR and the sensitivity and specificity of each method was determined by Bayesian latent class analysis. According to IRS, 19/28 pens were HEV positive. BS had a sensitivity of 95% and detected HEV in pens with 10% of pigs shedding; however, specificity was below 30%. FD were comparably accurate to P, with a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 86%, respectively. BS sampling is thus advised to detect early shedding of HEV or pen contamination, and FD to determine the duration of shedding. This study demonstrates that non-invasive sampling can replace rectal swabs in research on HEV in pigs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9962119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99621192023-02-26 Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens Meester, Marina Rademaker, Aniek Bouwknegt, Martijn Hakze-van der Honing, Renate W. Stegeman, Arjan van der Poel, Wim H. M. Tobias, Tijs J. Microorganisms Article Pigs are a reservoir of hepatitis E virus (HEV), which causes hepatitis in humans. To study the epidemiology of HEV in pig farms, sampling methods are currently used that cause discomfort to pigs, such as rectal sampling. In line with the 3Rs principle, we aimed to evaluate non-invasive methods to detect pens with HEV-shedding pigs. Twenty-eight pens of one farm were sampled cross-sectionally. Individual rectal swabs (IRS) were collected to determine prevalence within pens. Four pen-level samples were compared: a pool of IRS per pen (P), boot socks (BS), oral fluid (OF) and pooled faecal droppings (FD). Each sample was tested by RT-PCR and the sensitivity and specificity of each method was determined by Bayesian latent class analysis. According to IRS, 19/28 pens were HEV positive. BS had a sensitivity of 95% and detected HEV in pens with 10% of pigs shedding; however, specificity was below 30%. FD were comparably accurate to P, with a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 86%, respectively. BS sampling is thus advised to detect early shedding of HEV or pen contamination, and FD to determine the duration of shedding. This study demonstrates that non-invasive sampling can replace rectal swabs in research on HEV in pigs. MDPI 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9962119/ /pubmed/36838465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020500 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Meester, Marina Rademaker, Aniek Bouwknegt, Martijn Hakze-van der Honing, Renate W. Stegeman, Arjan van der Poel, Wim H. M. Tobias, Tijs J. Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens |
title | Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens |
title_full | Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens |
title_short | Evaluation of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus Infected Pigs in Pens |
title_sort | evaluation of non-invasive sampling methods for detection of hepatitis e virus infected pigs in pens |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36838465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020500 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meestermarina evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens AT rademakeraniek evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens AT bouwknegtmartijn evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens AT hakzevanderhoningrenatew evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens AT stegemanarjan evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens AT vanderpoelwimhm evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens AT tobiastijsj evaluationofnoninvasivesamplingmethodsfordetectionofhepatitisevirusinfectedpigsinpens |