Cargando…
What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A Randomized Cross-Over Study
Pulse wave velocity (PWV), a direct measure of arterial stiffness, is a promising biomarker of cardiovascular risk and a cardiovascular surrogate outcome. The resolution for detecting its smallest clinically significant change is dependent on the expected reproducibility, but there is currently no c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10020044 |
_version_ | 1784895984676896768 |
---|---|
author | Podrug, Mario Šunjić, Borna Koren, Pjero Đogaš, Varja Mudnić, Ivana Boban, Mladen Jerončić, Ana |
author_facet | Podrug, Mario Šunjić, Borna Koren, Pjero Đogaš, Varja Mudnić, Ivana Boban, Mladen Jerončić, Ana |
author_sort | Podrug, Mario |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pulse wave velocity (PWV), a direct measure of arterial stiffness, is a promising biomarker of cardiovascular risk and a cardiovascular surrogate outcome. The resolution for detecting its smallest clinically significant change is dependent on the expected reproducibility, but there is currently no consensus on this. We estimated the PWV reproducibility in a range of intra-subject values that were observed over a 2 week period in a broad range of participants and under clinically relevant experimental conditions (two observers, morning/afternoon sessions, and number of visits) using SphygmoCor and Arteriograph devices. Each participant was recorded 12 times with each device over three visits, one week apart, and two morning and two afternoon recordings were taken per visit. The factors affecting reproducibility and the discrepancies between the consecutive PWV measurements for each device were also examined using multilevel mixed-effect models. We show that current PWV estimation guidance recommending 2 + 1 measurements is suboptimal because the PWV range was outside of the 1 m/s threshold for most of the participants, which is proposed as a minimal clinically important difference. The best reproducibility was yielded with median of four measurements and a 1.1 m/s threshold. Although PWV reproducibility and repeatability are frequently used interchangeably in studies, we demonstrated that despite their relative measures of variability (e.g., coefficient of variation) being comparable, their ranges revealed a clinically significant difference between them. We also found that different physiological variables were predictors of the discrepancy between the consecutive measurements made by the two devices, which is likely due to their distinct modes of operation. The evidence base for PWV reproducibility is limited, and more research is needed to deepen our understanding of the variation in arterial stiffness over time, as well as fluctuations within a population group and in an intervention setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9962359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99623592023-02-26 What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A Randomized Cross-Over Study Podrug, Mario Šunjić, Borna Koren, Pjero Đogaš, Varja Mudnić, Ivana Boban, Mladen Jerončić, Ana J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Article Pulse wave velocity (PWV), a direct measure of arterial stiffness, is a promising biomarker of cardiovascular risk and a cardiovascular surrogate outcome. The resolution for detecting its smallest clinically significant change is dependent on the expected reproducibility, but there is currently no consensus on this. We estimated the PWV reproducibility in a range of intra-subject values that were observed over a 2 week period in a broad range of participants and under clinically relevant experimental conditions (two observers, morning/afternoon sessions, and number of visits) using SphygmoCor and Arteriograph devices. Each participant was recorded 12 times with each device over three visits, one week apart, and two morning and two afternoon recordings were taken per visit. The factors affecting reproducibility and the discrepancies between the consecutive PWV measurements for each device were also examined using multilevel mixed-effect models. We show that current PWV estimation guidance recommending 2 + 1 measurements is suboptimal because the PWV range was outside of the 1 m/s threshold for most of the participants, which is proposed as a minimal clinically important difference. The best reproducibility was yielded with median of four measurements and a 1.1 m/s threshold. Although PWV reproducibility and repeatability are frequently used interchangeably in studies, we demonstrated that despite their relative measures of variability (e.g., coefficient of variation) being comparable, their ranges revealed a clinically significant difference between them. We also found that different physiological variables were predictors of the discrepancy between the consecutive measurements made by the two devices, which is likely due to their distinct modes of operation. The evidence base for PWV reproducibility is limited, and more research is needed to deepen our understanding of the variation in arterial stiffness over time, as well as fluctuations within a population group and in an intervention setting. MDPI 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9962359/ /pubmed/36826540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10020044 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Podrug, Mario Šunjić, Borna Koren, Pjero Đogaš, Varja Mudnić, Ivana Boban, Mladen Jerončić, Ana What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A Randomized Cross-Over Study |
title | What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A Randomized Cross-Over Study |
title_full | What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A Randomized Cross-Over Study |
title_fullStr | What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A Randomized Cross-Over Study |
title_full_unstemmed | What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A Randomized Cross-Over Study |
title_short | What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A Randomized Cross-Over Study |
title_sort | what is the smallest change in pulse wave velocity measurements that can be attributed to clinical changes in arterial stiffness with certainty: a randomized cross-over study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10020044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT podrugmario whatisthesmallestchangeinpulsewavevelocitymeasurementsthatcanbeattributedtoclinicalchangesinarterialstiffnesswithcertaintyarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT sunjicborna whatisthesmallestchangeinpulsewavevelocitymeasurementsthatcanbeattributedtoclinicalchangesinarterialstiffnesswithcertaintyarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT korenpjero whatisthesmallestchangeinpulsewavevelocitymeasurementsthatcanbeattributedtoclinicalchangesinarterialstiffnesswithcertaintyarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT đogasvarja whatisthesmallestchangeinpulsewavevelocitymeasurementsthatcanbeattributedtoclinicalchangesinarterialstiffnesswithcertaintyarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT mudnicivana whatisthesmallestchangeinpulsewavevelocitymeasurementsthatcanbeattributedtoclinicalchangesinarterialstiffnesswithcertaintyarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT bobanmladen whatisthesmallestchangeinpulsewavevelocitymeasurementsthatcanbeattributedtoclinicalchangesinarterialstiffnesswithcertaintyarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT jeroncicana whatisthesmallestchangeinpulsewavevelocitymeasurementsthatcanbeattributedtoclinicalchangesinarterialstiffnesswithcertaintyarandomizedcrossoverstudy |