Cargando…

Residual Bone Height and New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using Biomaterials: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Background. Different factors may affect new bone formation following maxillary sinus floor augmentation for the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous maxilla. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of residual bone height (RBH) on new bone formation after lateral sinus augmentati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khijmatgar, Shahnavaz, Del Fabbro, Massimo, Tumedei, Margherita, Testori, Tiziano, Cenzato, Niccolò, Tartaglia, Gianluca Martino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16041376
_version_ 1784896021965307904
author Khijmatgar, Shahnavaz
Del Fabbro, Massimo
Tumedei, Margherita
Testori, Tiziano
Cenzato, Niccolò
Tartaglia, Gianluca Martino
author_facet Khijmatgar, Shahnavaz
Del Fabbro, Massimo
Tumedei, Margherita
Testori, Tiziano
Cenzato, Niccolò
Tartaglia, Gianluca Martino
author_sort Khijmatgar, Shahnavaz
collection PubMed
description Background. Different factors may affect new bone formation following maxillary sinus floor augmentation for the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous maxilla. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of residual bone height (RBH) on new bone formation after lateral sinus augmentation utilizing different biomaterials, through a network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods. PUBMED, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched until 31 December 2022 to obtain relevant articles. A hand search was also conducted. Randomised controlled studies on maxillary sinus augmentation comparing different grafting materials in patients with atrophic posterior maxilla, in need of prosthetic rehabilitation, were included. The risk of bias was assessed following the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration. The primary outcome was new bone formation (NBF), assessed histomorphometrically. The statistical analysis was performed by splitting the data according to RBH (<4 mm and ≥4 mm). Results. A total of 67 studies were eligible for conducting NMA. Overall, in the included studies, 1955 patients were treated and 2405 sinus augmentation procedures were performed. The biomaterials used were grouped into: autogenous bone (Auto), xenografts (XG), allografts (AG), alloplasts (AP), bioactive agents (Bio), hyaluronic acid (HA), and combinations of these. An inconsistency factor (IF) seen in the entire loop of the XG, AP, and Bio+AP was found to be statistically significant. The highest-ranked biomaterials for the <4 mm RBH outcome were XG+AG, XG+AP, and Auto. Similarly, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of biomaterials for ≥4 mm RBH was Auto, Bio+XG, and XG+Auto. Conclusion. There is no grafting biomaterial that is consistently performing better than others. The performance of the materials in terms of NBF may depend on the RBH. While choosing a biomaterial, practitioners should consider both patient-specific aspects and sinus clinical characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9962504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99625042023-02-26 Residual Bone Height and New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using Biomaterials: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials Khijmatgar, Shahnavaz Del Fabbro, Massimo Tumedei, Margherita Testori, Tiziano Cenzato, Niccolò Tartaglia, Gianluca Martino Materials (Basel) Review Background. Different factors may affect new bone formation following maxillary sinus floor augmentation for the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous maxilla. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of residual bone height (RBH) on new bone formation after lateral sinus augmentation utilizing different biomaterials, through a network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods. PUBMED, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched until 31 December 2022 to obtain relevant articles. A hand search was also conducted. Randomised controlled studies on maxillary sinus augmentation comparing different grafting materials in patients with atrophic posterior maxilla, in need of prosthetic rehabilitation, were included. The risk of bias was assessed following the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration. The primary outcome was new bone formation (NBF), assessed histomorphometrically. The statistical analysis was performed by splitting the data according to RBH (<4 mm and ≥4 mm). Results. A total of 67 studies were eligible for conducting NMA. Overall, in the included studies, 1955 patients were treated and 2405 sinus augmentation procedures were performed. The biomaterials used were grouped into: autogenous bone (Auto), xenografts (XG), allografts (AG), alloplasts (AP), bioactive agents (Bio), hyaluronic acid (HA), and combinations of these. An inconsistency factor (IF) seen in the entire loop of the XG, AP, and Bio+AP was found to be statistically significant. The highest-ranked biomaterials for the <4 mm RBH outcome were XG+AG, XG+AP, and Auto. Similarly, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of biomaterials for ≥4 mm RBH was Auto, Bio+XG, and XG+Auto. Conclusion. There is no grafting biomaterial that is consistently performing better than others. The performance of the materials in terms of NBF may depend on the RBH. While choosing a biomaterial, practitioners should consider both patient-specific aspects and sinus clinical characteristics. MDPI 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9962504/ /pubmed/36837005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16041376 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Khijmatgar, Shahnavaz
Del Fabbro, Massimo
Tumedei, Margherita
Testori, Tiziano
Cenzato, Niccolò
Tartaglia, Gianluca Martino
Residual Bone Height and New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using Biomaterials: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
title Residual Bone Height and New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using Biomaterials: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
title_full Residual Bone Height and New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using Biomaterials: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Residual Bone Height and New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using Biomaterials: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Residual Bone Height and New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using Biomaterials: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
title_short Residual Bone Height and New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using Biomaterials: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
title_sort residual bone height and new bone formation after maxillary sinus augmentation procedure using biomaterials: a network meta-analysis of clinical trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16041376
work_keys_str_mv AT khijmatgarshahnavaz residualboneheightandnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationprocedureusingbiomaterialsanetworkmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT delfabbromassimo residualboneheightandnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationprocedureusingbiomaterialsanetworkmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT tumedeimargherita residualboneheightandnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationprocedureusingbiomaterialsanetworkmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT testoritiziano residualboneheightandnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationprocedureusingbiomaterialsanetworkmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT cenzatoniccolo residualboneheightandnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationprocedureusingbiomaterialsanetworkmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT tartagliagianlucamartino residualboneheightandnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationprocedureusingbiomaterialsanetworkmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials