Cargando…
Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review
Background: Both lung transplant recipients and candidates are characterised by reduced training capacity and low average quality of life (QoL). This review investigates the impact of training on exercise ability and QoL in patients before and after lung transplant. Methods: Searches were conducted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020506 |
_version_ | 1784896051366330368 |
---|---|
author | Abidi, Yafet Kovats, Zsuzsanna Bohacs, Aniko Fekete, Monika Naas, Saoussen Madurka, Ildiko Torok, Klara Bogyo, Levente Varga, Janos Tamas |
author_facet | Abidi, Yafet Kovats, Zsuzsanna Bohacs, Aniko Fekete, Monika Naas, Saoussen Madurka, Ildiko Torok, Klara Bogyo, Levente Varga, Janos Tamas |
author_sort | Abidi, Yafet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Both lung transplant recipients and candidates are characterised by reduced training capacity and low average quality of life (QoL). This review investigates the impact of training on exercise ability and QoL in patients before and after lung transplant. Methods: Searches were conducted from the beginning to 7 March 2022 using the terms “exercise,” “rehabilitation,” “lung transplant,” “exercise ability,” “survival,” “quality of life” and “telerehabilitation” in six databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were studies evaluating the effects of an exercise training programme concurrent with lung transplantation as well as patients and candidates (>18 years old) through any lung diseases. The term “lung transplant rehabilitation” was used to refer to all carefully thought-out physical activities with the ultimate or intermediate objective of improving or maintaining physical health. Results: Out of 1422 articles, 10 clinical- and 3 telerehabilitation studies, candidates (n = 420) and recipients (n = 116) were related to the criteria and included in this review. The main outcome significantly improved in all studies. The 6-min walk distance, maximum exercise capacity, peak oxygen uptake, or endurance for constant load rate cycling improved measuring physical activity [aerobic exercises, breathing training, and aerobic and inspiratory muscle training sessions (IMT)]. Overall scores for dyspnoea improved after exercise training. Furthermore, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) also improved after aerobic exercise training, which was performed unsupervised or accompanied by breathing sessions. Aerobic training alone rather than combined with inspiratory muscle- (IMT) or breathing training enhanced exercise capacity. Conclusion: In conclusion, rehabilitation programmes seem to be beneficial to patients both preceding and following lung transplantation. More studies are required to determine the best training settings in terms of time scale, frequency, and work intensity in terms of improving exercise ability, dyspnoea, and HRQOL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9962622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99626222023-02-26 Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review Abidi, Yafet Kovats, Zsuzsanna Bohacs, Aniko Fekete, Monika Naas, Saoussen Madurka, Ildiko Torok, Klara Bogyo, Levente Varga, Janos Tamas Life (Basel) Review Background: Both lung transplant recipients and candidates are characterised by reduced training capacity and low average quality of life (QoL). This review investigates the impact of training on exercise ability and QoL in patients before and after lung transplant. Methods: Searches were conducted from the beginning to 7 March 2022 using the terms “exercise,” “rehabilitation,” “lung transplant,” “exercise ability,” “survival,” “quality of life” and “telerehabilitation” in six databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were studies evaluating the effects of an exercise training programme concurrent with lung transplantation as well as patients and candidates (>18 years old) through any lung diseases. The term “lung transplant rehabilitation” was used to refer to all carefully thought-out physical activities with the ultimate or intermediate objective of improving or maintaining physical health. Results: Out of 1422 articles, 10 clinical- and 3 telerehabilitation studies, candidates (n = 420) and recipients (n = 116) were related to the criteria and included in this review. The main outcome significantly improved in all studies. The 6-min walk distance, maximum exercise capacity, peak oxygen uptake, or endurance for constant load rate cycling improved measuring physical activity [aerobic exercises, breathing training, and aerobic and inspiratory muscle training sessions (IMT)]. Overall scores for dyspnoea improved after exercise training. Furthermore, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) also improved after aerobic exercise training, which was performed unsupervised or accompanied by breathing sessions. Aerobic training alone rather than combined with inspiratory muscle- (IMT) or breathing training enhanced exercise capacity. Conclusion: In conclusion, rehabilitation programmes seem to be beneficial to patients both preceding and following lung transplantation. More studies are required to determine the best training settings in terms of time scale, frequency, and work intensity in terms of improving exercise ability, dyspnoea, and HRQOL. MDPI 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9962622/ /pubmed/36836863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020506 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Abidi, Yafet Kovats, Zsuzsanna Bohacs, Aniko Fekete, Monika Naas, Saoussen Madurka, Ildiko Torok, Klara Bogyo, Levente Varga, Janos Tamas Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review |
title | Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review |
title_full | Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review |
title_fullStr | Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review |
title_short | Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review |
title_sort | lung transplant rehabilitation—a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abidiyafet lungtransplantrehabilitationareview AT kovatszsuzsanna lungtransplantrehabilitationareview AT bohacsaniko lungtransplantrehabilitationareview AT feketemonika lungtransplantrehabilitationareview AT naassaoussen lungtransplantrehabilitationareview AT madurkaildiko lungtransplantrehabilitationareview AT torokklara lungtransplantrehabilitationareview AT bogyolevente lungtransplantrehabilitationareview AT vargajanostamas lungtransplantrehabilitationareview |