Cargando…

Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review

Background: Both lung transplant recipients and candidates are characterised by reduced training capacity and low average quality of life (QoL). This review investigates the impact of training on exercise ability and QoL in patients before and after lung transplant. Methods: Searches were conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abidi, Yafet, Kovats, Zsuzsanna, Bohacs, Aniko, Fekete, Monika, Naas, Saoussen, Madurka, Ildiko, Torok, Klara, Bogyo, Levente, Varga, Janos Tamas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020506
_version_ 1784896051366330368
author Abidi, Yafet
Kovats, Zsuzsanna
Bohacs, Aniko
Fekete, Monika
Naas, Saoussen
Madurka, Ildiko
Torok, Klara
Bogyo, Levente
Varga, Janos Tamas
author_facet Abidi, Yafet
Kovats, Zsuzsanna
Bohacs, Aniko
Fekete, Monika
Naas, Saoussen
Madurka, Ildiko
Torok, Klara
Bogyo, Levente
Varga, Janos Tamas
author_sort Abidi, Yafet
collection PubMed
description Background: Both lung transplant recipients and candidates are characterised by reduced training capacity and low average quality of life (QoL). This review investigates the impact of training on exercise ability and QoL in patients before and after lung transplant. Methods: Searches were conducted from the beginning to 7 March 2022 using the terms “exercise,” “rehabilitation,” “lung transplant,” “exercise ability,” “survival,” “quality of life” and “telerehabilitation” in six databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were studies evaluating the effects of an exercise training programme concurrent with lung transplantation as well as patients and candidates (>18 years old) through any lung diseases. The term “lung transplant rehabilitation” was used to refer to all carefully thought-out physical activities with the ultimate or intermediate objective of improving or maintaining physical health. Results: Out of 1422 articles, 10 clinical- and 3 telerehabilitation studies, candidates (n = 420) and recipients (n = 116) were related to the criteria and included in this review. The main outcome significantly improved in all studies. The 6-min walk distance, maximum exercise capacity, peak oxygen uptake, or endurance for constant load rate cycling improved measuring physical activity [aerobic exercises, breathing training, and aerobic and inspiratory muscle training sessions (IMT)]. Overall scores for dyspnoea improved after exercise training. Furthermore, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) also improved after aerobic exercise training, which was performed unsupervised or accompanied by breathing sessions. Aerobic training alone rather than combined with inspiratory muscle- (IMT) or breathing training enhanced exercise capacity. Conclusion: In conclusion, rehabilitation programmes seem to be beneficial to patients both preceding and following lung transplantation. More studies are required to determine the best training settings in terms of time scale, frequency, and work intensity in terms of improving exercise ability, dyspnoea, and HRQOL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9962622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99626222023-02-26 Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review Abidi, Yafet Kovats, Zsuzsanna Bohacs, Aniko Fekete, Monika Naas, Saoussen Madurka, Ildiko Torok, Klara Bogyo, Levente Varga, Janos Tamas Life (Basel) Review Background: Both lung transplant recipients and candidates are characterised by reduced training capacity and low average quality of life (QoL). This review investigates the impact of training on exercise ability and QoL in patients before and after lung transplant. Methods: Searches were conducted from the beginning to 7 March 2022 using the terms “exercise,” “rehabilitation,” “lung transplant,” “exercise ability,” “survival,” “quality of life” and “telerehabilitation” in six databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were studies evaluating the effects of an exercise training programme concurrent with lung transplantation as well as patients and candidates (>18 years old) through any lung diseases. The term “lung transplant rehabilitation” was used to refer to all carefully thought-out physical activities with the ultimate or intermediate objective of improving or maintaining physical health. Results: Out of 1422 articles, 10 clinical- and 3 telerehabilitation studies, candidates (n = 420) and recipients (n = 116) were related to the criteria and included in this review. The main outcome significantly improved in all studies. The 6-min walk distance, maximum exercise capacity, peak oxygen uptake, or endurance for constant load rate cycling improved measuring physical activity [aerobic exercises, breathing training, and aerobic and inspiratory muscle training sessions (IMT)]. Overall scores for dyspnoea improved after exercise training. Furthermore, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) also improved after aerobic exercise training, which was performed unsupervised or accompanied by breathing sessions. Aerobic training alone rather than combined with inspiratory muscle- (IMT) or breathing training enhanced exercise capacity. Conclusion: In conclusion, rehabilitation programmes seem to be beneficial to patients both preceding and following lung transplantation. More studies are required to determine the best training settings in terms of time scale, frequency, and work intensity in terms of improving exercise ability, dyspnoea, and HRQOL. MDPI 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9962622/ /pubmed/36836863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020506 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Abidi, Yafet
Kovats, Zsuzsanna
Bohacs, Aniko
Fekete, Monika
Naas, Saoussen
Madurka, Ildiko
Torok, Klara
Bogyo, Levente
Varga, Janos Tamas
Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review
title Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review
title_full Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review
title_fullStr Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review
title_full_unstemmed Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review
title_short Lung Transplant Rehabilitation—A Review
title_sort lung transplant rehabilitation—a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020506
work_keys_str_mv AT abidiyafet lungtransplantrehabilitationareview
AT kovatszsuzsanna lungtransplantrehabilitationareview
AT bohacsaniko lungtransplantrehabilitationareview
AT feketemonika lungtransplantrehabilitationareview
AT naassaoussen lungtransplantrehabilitationareview
AT madurkaildiko lungtransplantrehabilitationareview
AT torokklara lungtransplantrehabilitationareview
AT bogyolevente lungtransplantrehabilitationareview
AT vargajanostamas lungtransplantrehabilitationareview