Cargando…
Interlaboratory Study to Evaluate a Testing Protocol for the Safety of Food Packaging Coatings
According to European regulations, migration from food packaging must be safe. However, currently, there is no consensus on how to evaluate its safety, especially for non-intentionally added substances (NIAS). The intensive and laborious approach, involving identification and then quantification of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36851031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020156 |
_version_ | 1784896122409451520 |
---|---|
author | Marin-Kuan, Maricel Pagnotti, Vincent Patin, Amaury Moulin, Julie Latado, Helia Varela, Jesús Hammel, Yves-Alexis Gude, Thomas Moor, Heidi Billinton, Nick Tate, Matthew Behnisch, Peter Alexander Besselink, Harrie Burleigh-Flayer, Heather Koster, Sander Szabo, David T. |
author_facet | Marin-Kuan, Maricel Pagnotti, Vincent Patin, Amaury Moulin, Julie Latado, Helia Varela, Jesús Hammel, Yves-Alexis Gude, Thomas Moor, Heidi Billinton, Nick Tate, Matthew Behnisch, Peter Alexander Besselink, Harrie Burleigh-Flayer, Heather Koster, Sander Szabo, David T. |
author_sort | Marin-Kuan, Maricel |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to European regulations, migration from food packaging must be safe. However, currently, there is no consensus on how to evaluate its safety, especially for non-intentionally added substances (NIAS). The intensive and laborious approach, involving identification and then quantification of all migrating substances followed by a toxicological evaluation, is not practical or feasible. In alignment with the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) and the European Union (EU) guidelines on packaging materials, efforts are focused on combining data from analytics, bioassays and in silico toxicology approaches for the risk assessment of packaging materials. Advancement of non-targeted screening approaches using both analytical methods and in vitro bioassays is key. A protocol was developed for the chemical and biological screening of migrants from coated metal packaging materials. This protocol includes guidance on sample preparation, migrant simulation, chemical analysis using liquid chromatography (LC-MS) and validated bioassays covering endocrine activity, genotoxicity and metabolism-related targets. An inter-laboratory study was set-up to evaluate the consistency in biological activity and analytical results generated between three independent laboratories applying the developed protocol and guidance. Coated packaging metal panels were used in this case study. In general, the inter-laboratory chemical analysis and bioassay results displayed acceptable consistency between laboratories, but technical differences led to different data interpretations (e.g., cytotoxicity, cell passages, chemical analysis). The study observations with the greatest impact on the quality of the data and ultimately resulting in discrepancies in the results are given and suggestions for improvement of the protocol are made (e.g., sample preparation, chemical analysis approaches). Finally, there was agreement on the need for an aligned protocol to be utilized by qualified laboratories for chemical and biological analyses, following best practices and guidance for packaging safety assessment of intentionally added substances (IAS) and NIAS to avoid inconsistency in data and the final interpretation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9962921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99629212023-02-26 Interlaboratory Study to Evaluate a Testing Protocol for the Safety of Food Packaging Coatings Marin-Kuan, Maricel Pagnotti, Vincent Patin, Amaury Moulin, Julie Latado, Helia Varela, Jesús Hammel, Yves-Alexis Gude, Thomas Moor, Heidi Billinton, Nick Tate, Matthew Behnisch, Peter Alexander Besselink, Harrie Burleigh-Flayer, Heather Koster, Sander Szabo, David T. Toxics Article According to European regulations, migration from food packaging must be safe. However, currently, there is no consensus on how to evaluate its safety, especially for non-intentionally added substances (NIAS). The intensive and laborious approach, involving identification and then quantification of all migrating substances followed by a toxicological evaluation, is not practical or feasible. In alignment with the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) and the European Union (EU) guidelines on packaging materials, efforts are focused on combining data from analytics, bioassays and in silico toxicology approaches for the risk assessment of packaging materials. Advancement of non-targeted screening approaches using both analytical methods and in vitro bioassays is key. A protocol was developed for the chemical and biological screening of migrants from coated metal packaging materials. This protocol includes guidance on sample preparation, migrant simulation, chemical analysis using liquid chromatography (LC-MS) and validated bioassays covering endocrine activity, genotoxicity and metabolism-related targets. An inter-laboratory study was set-up to evaluate the consistency in biological activity and analytical results generated between three independent laboratories applying the developed protocol and guidance. Coated packaging metal panels were used in this case study. In general, the inter-laboratory chemical analysis and bioassay results displayed acceptable consistency between laboratories, but technical differences led to different data interpretations (e.g., cytotoxicity, cell passages, chemical analysis). The study observations with the greatest impact on the quality of the data and ultimately resulting in discrepancies in the results are given and suggestions for improvement of the protocol are made (e.g., sample preparation, chemical analysis approaches). Finally, there was agreement on the need for an aligned protocol to be utilized by qualified laboratories for chemical and biological analyses, following best practices and guidance for packaging safety assessment of intentionally added substances (IAS) and NIAS to avoid inconsistency in data and the final interpretation. MDPI 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9962921/ /pubmed/36851031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020156 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Marin-Kuan, Maricel Pagnotti, Vincent Patin, Amaury Moulin, Julie Latado, Helia Varela, Jesús Hammel, Yves-Alexis Gude, Thomas Moor, Heidi Billinton, Nick Tate, Matthew Behnisch, Peter Alexander Besselink, Harrie Burleigh-Flayer, Heather Koster, Sander Szabo, David T. Interlaboratory Study to Evaluate a Testing Protocol for the Safety of Food Packaging Coatings |
title | Interlaboratory Study to Evaluate a Testing Protocol for the Safety of Food Packaging Coatings |
title_full | Interlaboratory Study to Evaluate a Testing Protocol for the Safety of Food Packaging Coatings |
title_fullStr | Interlaboratory Study to Evaluate a Testing Protocol for the Safety of Food Packaging Coatings |
title_full_unstemmed | Interlaboratory Study to Evaluate a Testing Protocol for the Safety of Food Packaging Coatings |
title_short | Interlaboratory Study to Evaluate a Testing Protocol for the Safety of Food Packaging Coatings |
title_sort | interlaboratory study to evaluate a testing protocol for the safety of food packaging coatings |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36851031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinkuanmaricel interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT pagnottivincent interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT patinamaury interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT moulinjulie interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT latadohelia interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT varelajesus interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT hammelyvesalexis interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT gudethomas interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT moorheidi interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT billintonnick interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT tatematthew interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT behnischpeteralexander interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT besselinkharrie interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT burleighflayerheather interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT kostersander interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings AT szabodavidt interlaboratorystudytoevaluateatestingprotocolforthesafetyoffoodpackagingcoatings |