Cargando…
Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study
We aim to examine the cross-education effects of unilateral muscle neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) training combined with illusionary mirror visual feedback (MVF). Fifteen adults (NMES + MVF: 5; NMES: 5, Control: 5) completed this study. The experimental groups completed a 3-week NMES tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043755 |
_version_ | 1784896127410110464 |
---|---|
author | Ye, Xin Vala, Daniel Walker, Hayden Gaza, Victor Umali, Vinz Brodoff, Patrick Gockel, Nathan Nakamura, Masatoshi |
author_facet | Ye, Xin Vala, Daniel Walker, Hayden Gaza, Victor Umali, Vinz Brodoff, Patrick Gockel, Nathan Nakamura, Masatoshi |
author_sort | Ye, Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aim to examine the cross-education effects of unilateral muscle neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) training combined with illusionary mirror visual feedback (MVF). Fifteen adults (NMES + MVF: 5; NMES: 5, Control: 5) completed this study. The experimental groups completed a 3-week NMES training on their dominant elbow flexor muscle. The NMES + MVF group had a mirror placed in the midsagittal plane between their upper arms, so a visual illusion was created in which their non-dominant arms appeared to be stimulated. Baseline and post-training measurements included both arms’ isometric strength, voluntary activation level, and resting twitch. Cross-education effects were not observed from all dependent variables. For the unilateral muscle, both experimental groups showed greater strength increases when compared to the control (isometric strength % changes: NMES + MVF vs. NMES vs. Control = 6.31 ± 4.56% vs. 4.72 ± 8.97% vs. −4.04 ± 3.85%, p < 0.05). Throughout the training, even with the maximally tolerated NMES, the NMES + MVF group had greater perceived exertion and discomfort than the NMES. Additionally, the NMES-evoked force increased throughout the training for both groups. Our data does not support that NMES combined with or without MVF induces cross-education. However, the stimulated muscle becomes more responsive to the NMES and can become stronger following the training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9962941 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99629412023-02-26 Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study Ye, Xin Vala, Daniel Walker, Hayden Gaza, Victor Umali, Vinz Brodoff, Patrick Gockel, Nathan Nakamura, Masatoshi Int J Environ Res Public Health Article We aim to examine the cross-education effects of unilateral muscle neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) training combined with illusionary mirror visual feedback (MVF). Fifteen adults (NMES + MVF: 5; NMES: 5, Control: 5) completed this study. The experimental groups completed a 3-week NMES training on their dominant elbow flexor muscle. The NMES + MVF group had a mirror placed in the midsagittal plane between their upper arms, so a visual illusion was created in which their non-dominant arms appeared to be stimulated. Baseline and post-training measurements included both arms’ isometric strength, voluntary activation level, and resting twitch. Cross-education effects were not observed from all dependent variables. For the unilateral muscle, both experimental groups showed greater strength increases when compared to the control (isometric strength % changes: NMES + MVF vs. NMES vs. Control = 6.31 ± 4.56% vs. 4.72 ± 8.97% vs. −4.04 ± 3.85%, p < 0.05). Throughout the training, even with the maximally tolerated NMES, the NMES + MVF group had greater perceived exertion and discomfort than the NMES. Additionally, the NMES-evoked force increased throughout the training for both groups. Our data does not support that NMES combined with or without MVF induces cross-education. However, the stimulated muscle becomes more responsive to the NMES and can become stronger following the training. MDPI 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9962941/ /pubmed/36834447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043755 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ye, Xin Vala, Daniel Walker, Hayden Gaza, Victor Umali, Vinz Brodoff, Patrick Gockel, Nathan Nakamura, Masatoshi Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study |
title | Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study |
title_full | Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study |
title_short | Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | effects of unilateral neuromuscular electrical stimulation with illusionary mirror visual feedback on the contralateral muscle: a pilot study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043755 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yexin effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy AT valadaniel effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy AT walkerhayden effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy AT gazavictor effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy AT umalivinz effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy AT brodoffpatrick effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy AT gockelnathan effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy AT nakamuramasatoshi effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy |