Cargando…

Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study

We aim to examine the cross-education effects of unilateral muscle neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) training combined with illusionary mirror visual feedback (MVF). Fifteen adults (NMES + MVF: 5; NMES: 5, Control: 5) completed this study. The experimental groups completed a 3-week NMES tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Xin, Vala, Daniel, Walker, Hayden, Gaza, Victor, Umali, Vinz, Brodoff, Patrick, Gockel, Nathan, Nakamura, Masatoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834447
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043755
_version_ 1784896127410110464
author Ye, Xin
Vala, Daniel
Walker, Hayden
Gaza, Victor
Umali, Vinz
Brodoff, Patrick
Gockel, Nathan
Nakamura, Masatoshi
author_facet Ye, Xin
Vala, Daniel
Walker, Hayden
Gaza, Victor
Umali, Vinz
Brodoff, Patrick
Gockel, Nathan
Nakamura, Masatoshi
author_sort Ye, Xin
collection PubMed
description We aim to examine the cross-education effects of unilateral muscle neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) training combined with illusionary mirror visual feedback (MVF). Fifteen adults (NMES + MVF: 5; NMES: 5, Control: 5) completed this study. The experimental groups completed a 3-week NMES training on their dominant elbow flexor muscle. The NMES + MVF group had a mirror placed in the midsagittal plane between their upper arms, so a visual illusion was created in which their non-dominant arms appeared to be stimulated. Baseline and post-training measurements included both arms’ isometric strength, voluntary activation level, and resting twitch. Cross-education effects were not observed from all dependent variables. For the unilateral muscle, both experimental groups showed greater strength increases when compared to the control (isometric strength % changes: NMES + MVF vs. NMES vs. Control = 6.31 ± 4.56% vs. 4.72 ± 8.97% vs. −4.04 ± 3.85%, p < 0.05). Throughout the training, even with the maximally tolerated NMES, the NMES + MVF group had greater perceived exertion and discomfort than the NMES. Additionally, the NMES-evoked force increased throughout the training for both groups. Our data does not support that NMES combined with or without MVF induces cross-education. However, the stimulated muscle becomes more responsive to the NMES and can become stronger following the training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9962941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99629412023-02-26 Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study Ye, Xin Vala, Daniel Walker, Hayden Gaza, Victor Umali, Vinz Brodoff, Patrick Gockel, Nathan Nakamura, Masatoshi Int J Environ Res Public Health Article We aim to examine the cross-education effects of unilateral muscle neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) training combined with illusionary mirror visual feedback (MVF). Fifteen adults (NMES + MVF: 5; NMES: 5, Control: 5) completed this study. The experimental groups completed a 3-week NMES training on their dominant elbow flexor muscle. The NMES + MVF group had a mirror placed in the midsagittal plane between their upper arms, so a visual illusion was created in which their non-dominant arms appeared to be stimulated. Baseline and post-training measurements included both arms’ isometric strength, voluntary activation level, and resting twitch. Cross-education effects were not observed from all dependent variables. For the unilateral muscle, both experimental groups showed greater strength increases when compared to the control (isometric strength % changes: NMES + MVF vs. NMES vs. Control = 6.31 ± 4.56% vs. 4.72 ± 8.97% vs. −4.04 ± 3.85%, p < 0.05). Throughout the training, even with the maximally tolerated NMES, the NMES + MVF group had greater perceived exertion and discomfort than the NMES. Additionally, the NMES-evoked force increased throughout the training for both groups. Our data does not support that NMES combined with or without MVF induces cross-education. However, the stimulated muscle becomes more responsive to the NMES and can become stronger following the training. MDPI 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9962941/ /pubmed/36834447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043755 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ye, Xin
Vala, Daniel
Walker, Hayden
Gaza, Victor
Umali, Vinz
Brodoff, Patrick
Gockel, Nathan
Nakamura, Masatoshi
Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study
title Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study
title_full Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study
title_short Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study
title_sort effects of unilateral neuromuscular electrical stimulation with illusionary mirror visual feedback on the contralateral muscle: a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36834447
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043755
work_keys_str_mv AT yexin effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy
AT valadaniel effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy
AT walkerhayden effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy
AT gazavictor effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy
AT umalivinz effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy
AT brodoffpatrick effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy
AT gockelnathan effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy
AT nakamuramasatoshi effectsofunilateralneuromuscularelectricalstimulationwithillusionarymirrorvisualfeedbackonthecontralateralmuscleapilotstudy