Cargando…
Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction
According to the literature, interproximal enamel reduction (IER) has become a consolidated technique used in orthodontic treatments to gain space in particular situations such as dental crowding, non-extractive therapies, tooth-size discrepancies, and prevention of dental relapse. There are differe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020110 |
_version_ | 1784896159948472320 |
---|---|
author | Silvestrini Biavati, Francesca Schiaffino, Viola Signore, Antonio De Angelis, Nicola Lanteri, Valentina Ugolini, Alessandro |
author_facet | Silvestrini Biavati, Francesca Schiaffino, Viola Signore, Antonio De Angelis, Nicola Lanteri, Valentina Ugolini, Alessandro |
author_sort | Silvestrini Biavati, Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to the literature, interproximal enamel reduction (IER) has become a consolidated technique used in orthodontic treatments to gain space in particular situations such as dental crowding, non-extractive therapies, tooth-size discrepancies, and prevention of dental relapse. There are different methods to realize stripping, and enamel surfaces resulting after this procedure can be analyzed with SEM. The aim of this study was to analyze how different devices of IER leave the surface of the teeth. One hundred and sixty freshly extracted, intact human lower incisors were included in the study, fixed in a plaster support, and then processed with four different techniques of enamel reduction and finishing. Then, they were divided randomly into eight groups (A1–A2, B1–B2, C1–C2, D, and E), each containing twenty teeth. The A, B, and C groups were divided into two subgroups and then all the teeth were observed at SEM. Each digital image acquired by SEM showed that there were streaks on the surfaces, due to the cutter used. The results of this study showed that only group C2 (tungsten carbide bur followed by twelve steps of medium–fine–ultrafine 3M Soft Lex disks) has a few line, which is very similar to group E (untreated group), while the other groups have a lot of lines and show a rougher final surface. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9963069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99630692023-02-26 Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction Silvestrini Biavati, Francesca Schiaffino, Viola Signore, Antonio De Angelis, Nicola Lanteri, Valentina Ugolini, Alessandro J Funct Biomater Article According to the literature, interproximal enamel reduction (IER) has become a consolidated technique used in orthodontic treatments to gain space in particular situations such as dental crowding, non-extractive therapies, tooth-size discrepancies, and prevention of dental relapse. There are different methods to realize stripping, and enamel surfaces resulting after this procedure can be analyzed with SEM. The aim of this study was to analyze how different devices of IER leave the surface of the teeth. One hundred and sixty freshly extracted, intact human lower incisors were included in the study, fixed in a plaster support, and then processed with four different techniques of enamel reduction and finishing. Then, they were divided randomly into eight groups (A1–A2, B1–B2, C1–C2, D, and E), each containing twenty teeth. The A, B, and C groups were divided into two subgroups and then all the teeth were observed at SEM. Each digital image acquired by SEM showed that there were streaks on the surfaces, due to the cutter used. The results of this study showed that only group C2 (tungsten carbide bur followed by twelve steps of medium–fine–ultrafine 3M Soft Lex disks) has a few line, which is very similar to group E (untreated group), while the other groups have a lot of lines and show a rougher final surface. MDPI 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9963069/ /pubmed/36826909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020110 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Silvestrini Biavati, Francesca Schiaffino, Viola Signore, Antonio De Angelis, Nicola Lanteri, Valentina Ugolini, Alessandro Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction |
title | Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction |
title_full | Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction |
title_short | Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction |
title_sort | evaluation of enamel surfaces after different techniques of interproximal enamel reduction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvestrinibiavatifrancesca evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction AT schiaffinoviola evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction AT signoreantonio evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction AT deangelisnicola evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction AT lanterivalentina evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction AT ugolinialessandro evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction |