Cargando…

Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction

According to the literature, interproximal enamel reduction (IER) has become a consolidated technique used in orthodontic treatments to gain space in particular situations such as dental crowding, non-extractive therapies, tooth-size discrepancies, and prevention of dental relapse. There are differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvestrini Biavati, Francesca, Schiaffino, Viola, Signore, Antonio, De Angelis, Nicola, Lanteri, Valentina, Ugolini, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020110
_version_ 1784896159948472320
author Silvestrini Biavati, Francesca
Schiaffino, Viola
Signore, Antonio
De Angelis, Nicola
Lanteri, Valentina
Ugolini, Alessandro
author_facet Silvestrini Biavati, Francesca
Schiaffino, Viola
Signore, Antonio
De Angelis, Nicola
Lanteri, Valentina
Ugolini, Alessandro
author_sort Silvestrini Biavati, Francesca
collection PubMed
description According to the literature, interproximal enamel reduction (IER) has become a consolidated technique used in orthodontic treatments to gain space in particular situations such as dental crowding, non-extractive therapies, tooth-size discrepancies, and prevention of dental relapse. There are different methods to realize stripping, and enamel surfaces resulting after this procedure can be analyzed with SEM. The aim of this study was to analyze how different devices of IER leave the surface of the teeth. One hundred and sixty freshly extracted, intact human lower incisors were included in the study, fixed in a plaster support, and then processed with four different techniques of enamel reduction and finishing. Then, they were divided randomly into eight groups (A1–A2, B1–B2, C1–C2, D, and E), each containing twenty teeth. The A, B, and C groups were divided into two subgroups and then all the teeth were observed at SEM. Each digital image acquired by SEM showed that there were streaks on the surfaces, due to the cutter used. The results of this study showed that only group C2 (tungsten carbide bur followed by twelve steps of medium–fine–ultrafine 3M Soft Lex disks) has a few line, which is very similar to group E (untreated group), while the other groups have a lot of lines and show a rougher final surface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9963069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99630692023-02-26 Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction Silvestrini Biavati, Francesca Schiaffino, Viola Signore, Antonio De Angelis, Nicola Lanteri, Valentina Ugolini, Alessandro J Funct Biomater Article According to the literature, interproximal enamel reduction (IER) has become a consolidated technique used in orthodontic treatments to gain space in particular situations such as dental crowding, non-extractive therapies, tooth-size discrepancies, and prevention of dental relapse. There are different methods to realize stripping, and enamel surfaces resulting after this procedure can be analyzed with SEM. The aim of this study was to analyze how different devices of IER leave the surface of the teeth. One hundred and sixty freshly extracted, intact human lower incisors were included in the study, fixed in a plaster support, and then processed with four different techniques of enamel reduction and finishing. Then, they were divided randomly into eight groups (A1–A2, B1–B2, C1–C2, D, and E), each containing twenty teeth. The A, B, and C groups were divided into two subgroups and then all the teeth were observed at SEM. Each digital image acquired by SEM showed that there were streaks on the surfaces, due to the cutter used. The results of this study showed that only group C2 (tungsten carbide bur followed by twelve steps of medium–fine–ultrafine 3M Soft Lex disks) has a few line, which is very similar to group E (untreated group), while the other groups have a lot of lines and show a rougher final surface. MDPI 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9963069/ /pubmed/36826909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020110 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Silvestrini Biavati, Francesca
Schiaffino, Viola
Signore, Antonio
De Angelis, Nicola
Lanteri, Valentina
Ugolini, Alessandro
Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction
title Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction
title_full Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction
title_fullStr Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction
title_short Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction
title_sort evaluation of enamel surfaces after different techniques of interproximal enamel reduction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020110
work_keys_str_mv AT silvestrinibiavatifrancesca evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction
AT schiaffinoviola evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction
AT signoreantonio evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction
AT deangelisnicola evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction
AT lanterivalentina evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction
AT ugolinialessandro evaluationofenamelsurfacesafterdifferenttechniquesofinterproximalenamelreduction