Cargando…

Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength

Over the past few decades, adhesive dentistry has advanced significantly. In light of minimal-invasive dentistry, this novel technique advocates a more conservative cavity design that relies on the efficiency of present enamel-dentine adhesives. The study aimed to address the scientific deficit in u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brkanović, Sandra, Sever, Eva Klarić, Vukelja, Josipa, Ivica, Anja, Miletić, Ivana, Krmek, Silvana Jukić
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837160
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16041530
_version_ 1784896195385098240
author Brkanović, Sandra
Sever, Eva Klarić
Vukelja, Josipa
Ivica, Anja
Miletić, Ivana
Krmek, Silvana Jukić
author_facet Brkanović, Sandra
Sever, Eva Klarić
Vukelja, Josipa
Ivica, Anja
Miletić, Ivana
Krmek, Silvana Jukić
author_sort Brkanović, Sandra
collection PubMed
description Over the past few decades, adhesive dentistry has advanced significantly. In light of minimal-invasive dentistry, this novel technique advocates a more conservative cavity design that relies on the efficiency of present enamel-dentine adhesives. The study aimed to address the scientific deficit in understanding the long-term bonding performance of universal adhesives and to provide a new clinical solution with desirable bond strength to dentin. The dentin bond strength of three bonding agents, G2-Bond Universal (GC), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray), and Scotchbond Universal Plus (3M ESPE), was evaluated following various storage and etching modes. The UltraTester (Ultradent) bond strength testing machine was used to assess shear bond strength. The results showed that thermal cycling and the choice of adhesive system significantly affected the shear bond strength (p = 0.018 and p = 0.001, respectively). Among the three adhesives, Scotchbond Universal Plus had the lowest bond strength value (mean value = 24.78 MPa), while G2-Bond Universal was found to have desirable shear bond strength to dentin compared to the other adhesives, even after one year in the oral environment (mean value = 35.15 MPa). These findings imply that the HEMA-free universal adhesive G2-Bond Universal is the most effective universal adhesive for clinical practices, particularly when applied in the self-etch mode.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9963205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99632052023-02-26 Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength Brkanović, Sandra Sever, Eva Klarić Vukelja, Josipa Ivica, Anja Miletić, Ivana Krmek, Silvana Jukić Materials (Basel) Article Over the past few decades, adhesive dentistry has advanced significantly. In light of minimal-invasive dentistry, this novel technique advocates a more conservative cavity design that relies on the efficiency of present enamel-dentine adhesives. The study aimed to address the scientific deficit in understanding the long-term bonding performance of universal adhesives and to provide a new clinical solution with desirable bond strength to dentin. The dentin bond strength of three bonding agents, G2-Bond Universal (GC), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray), and Scotchbond Universal Plus (3M ESPE), was evaluated following various storage and etching modes. The UltraTester (Ultradent) bond strength testing machine was used to assess shear bond strength. The results showed that thermal cycling and the choice of adhesive system significantly affected the shear bond strength (p = 0.018 and p = 0.001, respectively). Among the three adhesives, Scotchbond Universal Plus had the lowest bond strength value (mean value = 24.78 MPa), while G2-Bond Universal was found to have desirable shear bond strength to dentin compared to the other adhesives, even after one year in the oral environment (mean value = 35.15 MPa). These findings imply that the HEMA-free universal adhesive G2-Bond Universal is the most effective universal adhesive for clinical practices, particularly when applied in the self-etch mode. MDPI 2023-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9963205/ /pubmed/36837160 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16041530 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brkanović, Sandra
Sever, Eva Klarić
Vukelja, Josipa
Ivica, Anja
Miletić, Ivana
Krmek, Silvana Jukić
Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength
title Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength
title_full Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength
title_short Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength
title_sort comparison of different universal adhesive systems on dentin bond strength
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837160
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16041530
work_keys_str_mv AT brkanovicsandra comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength
AT severevaklaric comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength
AT vukeljajosipa comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength
AT ivicaanja comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength
AT mileticivana comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength
AT krmeksilvanajukic comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength