Cargando…
Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength
Over the past few decades, adhesive dentistry has advanced significantly. In light of minimal-invasive dentistry, this novel technique advocates a more conservative cavity design that relies on the efficiency of present enamel-dentine adhesives. The study aimed to address the scientific deficit in u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837160 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16041530 |
_version_ | 1784896195385098240 |
---|---|
author | Brkanović, Sandra Sever, Eva Klarić Vukelja, Josipa Ivica, Anja Miletić, Ivana Krmek, Silvana Jukić |
author_facet | Brkanović, Sandra Sever, Eva Klarić Vukelja, Josipa Ivica, Anja Miletić, Ivana Krmek, Silvana Jukić |
author_sort | Brkanović, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over the past few decades, adhesive dentistry has advanced significantly. In light of minimal-invasive dentistry, this novel technique advocates a more conservative cavity design that relies on the efficiency of present enamel-dentine adhesives. The study aimed to address the scientific deficit in understanding the long-term bonding performance of universal adhesives and to provide a new clinical solution with desirable bond strength to dentin. The dentin bond strength of three bonding agents, G2-Bond Universal (GC), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray), and Scotchbond Universal Plus (3M ESPE), was evaluated following various storage and etching modes. The UltraTester (Ultradent) bond strength testing machine was used to assess shear bond strength. The results showed that thermal cycling and the choice of adhesive system significantly affected the shear bond strength (p = 0.018 and p = 0.001, respectively). Among the three adhesives, Scotchbond Universal Plus had the lowest bond strength value (mean value = 24.78 MPa), while G2-Bond Universal was found to have desirable shear bond strength to dentin compared to the other adhesives, even after one year in the oral environment (mean value = 35.15 MPa). These findings imply that the HEMA-free universal adhesive G2-Bond Universal is the most effective universal adhesive for clinical practices, particularly when applied in the self-etch mode. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9963205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99632052023-02-26 Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength Brkanović, Sandra Sever, Eva Klarić Vukelja, Josipa Ivica, Anja Miletić, Ivana Krmek, Silvana Jukić Materials (Basel) Article Over the past few decades, adhesive dentistry has advanced significantly. In light of minimal-invasive dentistry, this novel technique advocates a more conservative cavity design that relies on the efficiency of present enamel-dentine adhesives. The study aimed to address the scientific deficit in understanding the long-term bonding performance of universal adhesives and to provide a new clinical solution with desirable bond strength to dentin. The dentin bond strength of three bonding agents, G2-Bond Universal (GC), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray), and Scotchbond Universal Plus (3M ESPE), was evaluated following various storage and etching modes. The UltraTester (Ultradent) bond strength testing machine was used to assess shear bond strength. The results showed that thermal cycling and the choice of adhesive system significantly affected the shear bond strength (p = 0.018 and p = 0.001, respectively). Among the three adhesives, Scotchbond Universal Plus had the lowest bond strength value (mean value = 24.78 MPa), while G2-Bond Universal was found to have desirable shear bond strength to dentin compared to the other adhesives, even after one year in the oral environment (mean value = 35.15 MPa). These findings imply that the HEMA-free universal adhesive G2-Bond Universal is the most effective universal adhesive for clinical practices, particularly when applied in the self-etch mode. MDPI 2023-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9963205/ /pubmed/36837160 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16041530 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Brkanović, Sandra Sever, Eva Klarić Vukelja, Josipa Ivica, Anja Miletić, Ivana Krmek, Silvana Jukić Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength |
title | Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength |
title_full | Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength |
title_short | Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Dentin Bond Strength |
title_sort | comparison of different universal adhesive systems on dentin bond strength |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837160 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16041530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brkanovicsandra comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength AT severevaklaric comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength AT vukeljajosipa comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength AT ivicaanja comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength AT mileticivana comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength AT krmeksilvanajukic comparisonofdifferentuniversaladhesivesystemsondentinbondstrength |