Cargando…

Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of balloon dilation in ureteral stricture and to analyze the risk factors for the failure of balloon dilation, which will hopefully provide some reference for clinicians to develop treatment plans. We retrospectively analyzed 196 patients who underwent ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Bing, Gao, Wenzhi, Yang, Kunlin, Liu, Honglei, Han, Yangjun, Diao, Mingxin, Zuo, Chao, Zhang, Minghua, Diao, Yingzhi, Li, Zhihua, Li, Xinfei, Wang, Gang, Zhang, Peng, Wang, Chunji, Xiao, Chunjuan, Huang, Chen, Gu, Yaming, Li, Xuesong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041655
_version_ 1784896264860598272
author Wang, Bing
Gao, Wenzhi
Yang, Kunlin
Liu, Honglei
Han, Yangjun
Diao, Mingxin
Zuo, Chao
Zhang, Minghua
Diao, Yingzhi
Li, Zhihua
Li, Xinfei
Wang, Gang
Zhang, Peng
Wang, Chunji
Xiao, Chunjuan
Huang, Chen
Gu, Yaming
Li, Xuesong
author_facet Wang, Bing
Gao, Wenzhi
Yang, Kunlin
Liu, Honglei
Han, Yangjun
Diao, Mingxin
Zuo, Chao
Zhang, Minghua
Diao, Yingzhi
Li, Zhihua
Li, Xinfei
Wang, Gang
Zhang, Peng
Wang, Chunji
Xiao, Chunjuan
Huang, Chen
Gu, Yaming
Li, Xuesong
author_sort Wang, Bing
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of balloon dilation in ureteral stricture and to analyze the risk factors for the failure of balloon dilation, which will hopefully provide some reference for clinicians to develop treatment plans. We retrospectively analyzed 196 patients who underwent balloon dilation between January 2012 and August 2022, 127 of whom had complete baseline and follow-up data. General clinical data, perioperative data, balloon parameters at the time of surgery, and follow-up results were collected from the patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for the risk factors for surgical failure in patients undergoing balloon dilatation. The success rates of balloon dilatation (n = 30) and balloon dilatation combined with endoureterotomy (n = 37) for lower ureteral stricture at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 81.08%, 78.38%, and 78.38% and 90%, 90%, and 86.67%, respectively. The success rates of balloon dilation at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year in patients with recurrent upper ureteral stricture after pyeloplasty (n = 15) and primary treatment (n = 30) were 73.33%, 60%, and 53.33% and 80%, 80%, and 73.33%, respectively. The success rates of surgery at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year for patients with recurrence of lower ureteral stricture after ureteral reimplantation or endoureterotomy (n = 4) and primary treatment with balloon dilatation (n = 34) were 75%, 75%, and 75% and 85.29%, 79.41%, and 79.41%, respectively. Multivariate analysis of the failure of balloon dilation showed that balloon circumference and multiple ureteral strictures were risk factors for balloon dilation failure (OR = 0.143, 95% CI: 0.023–0.895, p = 0.038; OR = 1.221, 95% CI: 1.002–1.491, p = 0.05). Balloon dilation combined with endoureterotomy in lower ureteral stricture had a higher success rate than balloon dilation alone. The success rate of balloon dilation in the primary treatment of the upper and lower ureter was higher than that of balloon dilation in the secondary treatment after failed repair surgery. Balloon circumference and multiple ureteral strictures are risk factors for balloon dilation failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9963490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99634902023-02-26 Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture Wang, Bing Gao, Wenzhi Yang, Kunlin Liu, Honglei Han, Yangjun Diao, Mingxin Zuo, Chao Zhang, Minghua Diao, Yingzhi Li, Zhihua Li, Xinfei Wang, Gang Zhang, Peng Wang, Chunji Xiao, Chunjuan Huang, Chen Gu, Yaming Li, Xuesong J Clin Med Article This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of balloon dilation in ureteral stricture and to analyze the risk factors for the failure of balloon dilation, which will hopefully provide some reference for clinicians to develop treatment plans. We retrospectively analyzed 196 patients who underwent balloon dilation between January 2012 and August 2022, 127 of whom had complete baseline and follow-up data. General clinical data, perioperative data, balloon parameters at the time of surgery, and follow-up results were collected from the patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for the risk factors for surgical failure in patients undergoing balloon dilatation. The success rates of balloon dilatation (n = 30) and balloon dilatation combined with endoureterotomy (n = 37) for lower ureteral stricture at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 81.08%, 78.38%, and 78.38% and 90%, 90%, and 86.67%, respectively. The success rates of balloon dilation at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year in patients with recurrent upper ureteral stricture after pyeloplasty (n = 15) and primary treatment (n = 30) were 73.33%, 60%, and 53.33% and 80%, 80%, and 73.33%, respectively. The success rates of surgery at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year for patients with recurrence of lower ureteral stricture after ureteral reimplantation or endoureterotomy (n = 4) and primary treatment with balloon dilatation (n = 34) were 75%, 75%, and 75% and 85.29%, 79.41%, and 79.41%, respectively. Multivariate analysis of the failure of balloon dilation showed that balloon circumference and multiple ureteral strictures were risk factors for balloon dilation failure (OR = 0.143, 95% CI: 0.023–0.895, p = 0.038; OR = 1.221, 95% CI: 1.002–1.491, p = 0.05). Balloon dilation combined with endoureterotomy in lower ureteral stricture had a higher success rate than balloon dilation alone. The success rate of balloon dilation in the primary treatment of the upper and lower ureter was higher than that of balloon dilation in the secondary treatment after failed repair surgery. Balloon circumference and multiple ureteral strictures are risk factors for balloon dilation failure. MDPI 2023-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9963490/ /pubmed/36836191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041655 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Bing
Gao, Wenzhi
Yang, Kunlin
Liu, Honglei
Han, Yangjun
Diao, Mingxin
Zuo, Chao
Zhang, Minghua
Diao, Yingzhi
Li, Zhihua
Li, Xinfei
Wang, Gang
Zhang, Peng
Wang, Chunji
Xiao, Chunjuan
Huang, Chen
Gu, Yaming
Li, Xuesong
Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture
title Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture
title_full Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture
title_fullStr Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture
title_short Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture
title_sort analysis of the efficacy and risk factors for failure of balloon dilation for benign ureteral stricture
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041655
work_keys_str_mv AT wangbing analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT gaowenzhi analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT yangkunlin analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT liuhonglei analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT hanyangjun analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT diaomingxin analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT zuochao analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT zhangminghua analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT diaoyingzhi analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT lizhihua analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT lixinfei analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT wanggang analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT zhangpeng analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT wangchunji analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT xiaochunjuan analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT huangchen analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT guyaming analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture
AT lixuesong analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture