Cargando…
Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture
This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of balloon dilation in ureteral stricture and to analyze the risk factors for the failure of balloon dilation, which will hopefully provide some reference for clinicians to develop treatment plans. We retrospectively analyzed 196 patients who underwent ba...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041655 |
_version_ | 1784896264860598272 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Bing Gao, Wenzhi Yang, Kunlin Liu, Honglei Han, Yangjun Diao, Mingxin Zuo, Chao Zhang, Minghua Diao, Yingzhi Li, Zhihua Li, Xinfei Wang, Gang Zhang, Peng Wang, Chunji Xiao, Chunjuan Huang, Chen Gu, Yaming Li, Xuesong |
author_facet | Wang, Bing Gao, Wenzhi Yang, Kunlin Liu, Honglei Han, Yangjun Diao, Mingxin Zuo, Chao Zhang, Minghua Diao, Yingzhi Li, Zhihua Li, Xinfei Wang, Gang Zhang, Peng Wang, Chunji Xiao, Chunjuan Huang, Chen Gu, Yaming Li, Xuesong |
author_sort | Wang, Bing |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of balloon dilation in ureteral stricture and to analyze the risk factors for the failure of balloon dilation, which will hopefully provide some reference for clinicians to develop treatment plans. We retrospectively analyzed 196 patients who underwent balloon dilation between January 2012 and August 2022, 127 of whom had complete baseline and follow-up data. General clinical data, perioperative data, balloon parameters at the time of surgery, and follow-up results were collected from the patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for the risk factors for surgical failure in patients undergoing balloon dilatation. The success rates of balloon dilatation (n = 30) and balloon dilatation combined with endoureterotomy (n = 37) for lower ureteral stricture at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 81.08%, 78.38%, and 78.38% and 90%, 90%, and 86.67%, respectively. The success rates of balloon dilation at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year in patients with recurrent upper ureteral stricture after pyeloplasty (n = 15) and primary treatment (n = 30) were 73.33%, 60%, and 53.33% and 80%, 80%, and 73.33%, respectively. The success rates of surgery at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year for patients with recurrence of lower ureteral stricture after ureteral reimplantation or endoureterotomy (n = 4) and primary treatment with balloon dilatation (n = 34) were 75%, 75%, and 75% and 85.29%, 79.41%, and 79.41%, respectively. Multivariate analysis of the failure of balloon dilation showed that balloon circumference and multiple ureteral strictures were risk factors for balloon dilation failure (OR = 0.143, 95% CI: 0.023–0.895, p = 0.038; OR = 1.221, 95% CI: 1.002–1.491, p = 0.05). Balloon dilation combined with endoureterotomy in lower ureteral stricture had a higher success rate than balloon dilation alone. The success rate of balloon dilation in the primary treatment of the upper and lower ureter was higher than that of balloon dilation in the secondary treatment after failed repair surgery. Balloon circumference and multiple ureteral strictures are risk factors for balloon dilation failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9963490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99634902023-02-26 Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture Wang, Bing Gao, Wenzhi Yang, Kunlin Liu, Honglei Han, Yangjun Diao, Mingxin Zuo, Chao Zhang, Minghua Diao, Yingzhi Li, Zhihua Li, Xinfei Wang, Gang Zhang, Peng Wang, Chunji Xiao, Chunjuan Huang, Chen Gu, Yaming Li, Xuesong J Clin Med Article This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of balloon dilation in ureteral stricture and to analyze the risk factors for the failure of balloon dilation, which will hopefully provide some reference for clinicians to develop treatment plans. We retrospectively analyzed 196 patients who underwent balloon dilation between January 2012 and August 2022, 127 of whom had complete baseline and follow-up data. General clinical data, perioperative data, balloon parameters at the time of surgery, and follow-up results were collected from the patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for the risk factors for surgical failure in patients undergoing balloon dilatation. The success rates of balloon dilatation (n = 30) and balloon dilatation combined with endoureterotomy (n = 37) for lower ureteral stricture at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 81.08%, 78.38%, and 78.38% and 90%, 90%, and 86.67%, respectively. The success rates of balloon dilation at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year in patients with recurrent upper ureteral stricture after pyeloplasty (n = 15) and primary treatment (n = 30) were 73.33%, 60%, and 53.33% and 80%, 80%, and 73.33%, respectively. The success rates of surgery at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year for patients with recurrence of lower ureteral stricture after ureteral reimplantation or endoureterotomy (n = 4) and primary treatment with balloon dilatation (n = 34) were 75%, 75%, and 75% and 85.29%, 79.41%, and 79.41%, respectively. Multivariate analysis of the failure of balloon dilation showed that balloon circumference and multiple ureteral strictures were risk factors for balloon dilation failure (OR = 0.143, 95% CI: 0.023–0.895, p = 0.038; OR = 1.221, 95% CI: 1.002–1.491, p = 0.05). Balloon dilation combined with endoureterotomy in lower ureteral stricture had a higher success rate than balloon dilation alone. The success rate of balloon dilation in the primary treatment of the upper and lower ureter was higher than that of balloon dilation in the secondary treatment after failed repair surgery. Balloon circumference and multiple ureteral strictures are risk factors for balloon dilation failure. MDPI 2023-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9963490/ /pubmed/36836191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041655 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Bing Gao, Wenzhi Yang, Kunlin Liu, Honglei Han, Yangjun Diao, Mingxin Zuo, Chao Zhang, Minghua Diao, Yingzhi Li, Zhihua Li, Xinfei Wang, Gang Zhang, Peng Wang, Chunji Xiao, Chunjuan Huang, Chen Gu, Yaming Li, Xuesong Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture |
title | Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture |
title_full | Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture |
title_fullStr | Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture |
title_short | Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors for Failure of Balloon Dilation for Benign Ureteral Stricture |
title_sort | analysis of the efficacy and risk factors for failure of balloon dilation for benign ureteral stricture |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041655 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangbing analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT gaowenzhi analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT yangkunlin analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT liuhonglei analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT hanyangjun analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT diaomingxin analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT zuochao analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT zhangminghua analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT diaoyingzhi analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT lizhihua analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT lixinfei analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT wanggang analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT zhangpeng analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT wangchunji analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT xiaochunjuan analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT huangchen analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT guyaming analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture AT lixuesong analysisoftheefficacyandriskfactorsforfailureofballoondilationforbenignureteralstricture |