Cargando…

Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves?

(1) Background: Far-UVC radiation in the spectral range 200–230 nm has, according to previous findings, a strong antimicrobial effect on pathogens, but exhibits hardly any harmful effect on human skin. Therefore, the present study will discuss whether such radiation could also be suitable for hand d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hessling, Martin, Sicks, Ben, Lau, Bernhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36839485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020213
_version_ 1784896341214756864
author Hessling, Martin
Sicks, Ben
Lau, Bernhard
author_facet Hessling, Martin
Sicks, Ben
Lau, Bernhard
author_sort Hessling, Martin
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Far-UVC radiation in the spectral range 200–230 nm has, according to previous findings, a strong antimicrobial effect on pathogens, but exhibits hardly any harmful effect on human skin. Therefore, the present study will discuss whether such radiation could also be suitable for hand disinfection in the healthcare sector. (2) Methods: Hands and gloves were microbially contaminated and exposed to radiation from a 222 nm krypton-chloride-excimer lamp. The applied doses were 23 mJ/cm(2) and 100 mJ/cm(2), respectively. Irradiated and non-irradiated hands and gloves were pressed onto agar plates and colonies were counted and compared after 24 h of incubation. For comparison, we also treated hands and gloves with a commercial liquid alcohol-based disinfectant. (3) Results: On the hand, the 23 mJ/cm(2) resulted in the reduction of the observed colonies on the agar plates by one log level. For the gloves irradiated with 100 mJ/cm(2), a colony reduction of 1.3 log levels was recorded. In the comparative experiments with the commercial disinfectant, a colony reduction of 1.9 and approximately one log level was observed on hand and gloves, respectively. (4) Conclusion: In both cases, far-UVC radiation provided a considerable reduction in microorganisms. However, compared to published far-UVC irradiation results in suspensions, the disinfection success on hands and gloves was rather low. With regard to the irradiation limits currently existing in the European Union, multiple daily hand disinfection with far-UVC radiation is actually legally not possible at present, but the thresholds are currently under discussion and could change in the future. Far-UVC disinfection of hands in gloves seems theoretically possible if attention is paid to potential perforations in the gloves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9963788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99637882023-02-26 Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves? Hessling, Martin Sicks, Ben Lau, Bernhard Pathogens Communication (1) Background: Far-UVC radiation in the spectral range 200–230 nm has, according to previous findings, a strong antimicrobial effect on pathogens, but exhibits hardly any harmful effect on human skin. Therefore, the present study will discuss whether such radiation could also be suitable for hand disinfection in the healthcare sector. (2) Methods: Hands and gloves were microbially contaminated and exposed to radiation from a 222 nm krypton-chloride-excimer lamp. The applied doses were 23 mJ/cm(2) and 100 mJ/cm(2), respectively. Irradiated and non-irradiated hands and gloves were pressed onto agar plates and colonies were counted and compared after 24 h of incubation. For comparison, we also treated hands and gloves with a commercial liquid alcohol-based disinfectant. (3) Results: On the hand, the 23 mJ/cm(2) resulted in the reduction of the observed colonies on the agar plates by one log level. For the gloves irradiated with 100 mJ/cm(2), a colony reduction of 1.3 log levels was recorded. In the comparative experiments with the commercial disinfectant, a colony reduction of 1.9 and approximately one log level was observed on hand and gloves, respectively. (4) Conclusion: In both cases, far-UVC radiation provided a considerable reduction in microorganisms. However, compared to published far-UVC irradiation results in suspensions, the disinfection success on hands and gloves was rather low. With regard to the irradiation limits currently existing in the European Union, multiple daily hand disinfection with far-UVC radiation is actually legally not possible at present, but the thresholds are currently under discussion and could change in the future. Far-UVC disinfection of hands in gloves seems theoretically possible if attention is paid to potential perforations in the gloves. MDPI 2023-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9963788/ /pubmed/36839485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020213 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Hessling, Martin
Sicks, Ben
Lau, Bernhard
Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves?
title Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves?
title_full Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves?
title_fullStr Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves?
title_full_unstemmed Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves?
title_short Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves?
title_sort far-uvc radiation for disinfecting hands or gloves?
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36839485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020213
work_keys_str_mv AT hesslingmartin faruvcradiationfordisinfectinghandsorgloves
AT sicksben faruvcradiationfordisinfectinghandsorgloves
AT laubernhard faruvcradiationfordisinfectinghandsorgloves