Cargando…

Laparoscopic Esocardiomyotomy—Risk Factors and Implications of Intraoperative Mucosal Perforation

Background: Mucosal perforation during laparoscopic esocardiomyotomy is quite frequent, and its consequences cannot always be neglected. The purpose of the study is to investigate the risk factors for intraoperative mucosal perforation and its implications on the postoperative outcomes and the funct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alkadour, Abdullah, Panaitescu, Eugenia, Hoară, Petre, Constantinoiu, Silviu, Mitrea-Tocitu, Madalina, Ciuc, Diana, Dinca, Valeriu-Gabi, Bîrla, Rodica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020340
_version_ 1784896355489021952
author Alkadour, Abdullah
Panaitescu, Eugenia
Hoară, Petre
Constantinoiu, Silviu
Mitrea-Tocitu, Madalina
Ciuc, Diana
Dinca, Valeriu-Gabi
Bîrla, Rodica
author_facet Alkadour, Abdullah
Panaitescu, Eugenia
Hoară, Petre
Constantinoiu, Silviu
Mitrea-Tocitu, Madalina
Ciuc, Diana
Dinca, Valeriu-Gabi
Bîrla, Rodica
author_sort Alkadour, Abdullah
collection PubMed
description Background: Mucosal perforation during laparoscopic esocardiomyotomy is quite frequent, and its consequences cannot always be neglected. The purpose of the study is to investigate the risk factors for intraoperative mucosal perforation and its implications on the postoperative outcomes and the functional results three months postoperatively. Material and methods: We retrospectively identified the patients with laparoscopic esocardiomyotomy performed at Sf. Maria Hospital Bucharest, in the period between January 2017–January 2022 and collected the data (preoperative—clinic, manometric and imaging, intra-and postoperative). To identify the risk factors for mucosal perforations, we used logistic regression analysis. Results: We included 60 patients; intraoperative mucosal perforation occurred in 8.33% of patients. The risk factors were: the presence of tertiary contractions (OR = 14.00, 95%CI = [1.23, 158.84], p = 0.033206), the number of propagated waves ≤6 (OR = 14.50), 95%CI = [1.18, 153.33], p < 0.05), the length of esophageal myotomy (OR = 1.74, 95%CI = [1.04, 2.89] p < 0.05), the length of esocardiomyotomy (OR = 1.74, 95%CI = [1.04, 2.89] p < 0.05), and a protective factor—the intraoperative upper endoscopy (OR = 0.037, 95%CI = [0.003, 0.382] p < 0.05). Conclusions: Identifying risk factors for this adverse intraoperative event may decrease the incidence and make this surgery safer. Although mucosal perforation resulted in prolonged hospital stays, it did not lead to significant differences in functional outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9963844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99638442023-02-26 Laparoscopic Esocardiomyotomy—Risk Factors and Implications of Intraoperative Mucosal Perforation Alkadour, Abdullah Panaitescu, Eugenia Hoară, Petre Constantinoiu, Silviu Mitrea-Tocitu, Madalina Ciuc, Diana Dinca, Valeriu-Gabi Bîrla, Rodica Life (Basel) Article Background: Mucosal perforation during laparoscopic esocardiomyotomy is quite frequent, and its consequences cannot always be neglected. The purpose of the study is to investigate the risk factors for intraoperative mucosal perforation and its implications on the postoperative outcomes and the functional results three months postoperatively. Material and methods: We retrospectively identified the patients with laparoscopic esocardiomyotomy performed at Sf. Maria Hospital Bucharest, in the period between January 2017–January 2022 and collected the data (preoperative—clinic, manometric and imaging, intra-and postoperative). To identify the risk factors for mucosal perforations, we used logistic regression analysis. Results: We included 60 patients; intraoperative mucosal perforation occurred in 8.33% of patients. The risk factors were: the presence of tertiary contractions (OR = 14.00, 95%CI = [1.23, 158.84], p = 0.033206), the number of propagated waves ≤6 (OR = 14.50), 95%CI = [1.18, 153.33], p < 0.05), the length of esophageal myotomy (OR = 1.74, 95%CI = [1.04, 2.89] p < 0.05), the length of esocardiomyotomy (OR = 1.74, 95%CI = [1.04, 2.89] p < 0.05), and a protective factor—the intraoperative upper endoscopy (OR = 0.037, 95%CI = [0.003, 0.382] p < 0.05). Conclusions: Identifying risk factors for this adverse intraoperative event may decrease the incidence and make this surgery safer. Although mucosal perforation resulted in prolonged hospital stays, it did not lead to significant differences in functional outcomes. MDPI 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9963844/ /pubmed/36836695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020340 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alkadour, Abdullah
Panaitescu, Eugenia
Hoară, Petre
Constantinoiu, Silviu
Mitrea-Tocitu, Madalina
Ciuc, Diana
Dinca, Valeriu-Gabi
Bîrla, Rodica
Laparoscopic Esocardiomyotomy—Risk Factors and Implications of Intraoperative Mucosal Perforation
title Laparoscopic Esocardiomyotomy—Risk Factors and Implications of Intraoperative Mucosal Perforation
title_full Laparoscopic Esocardiomyotomy—Risk Factors and Implications of Intraoperative Mucosal Perforation
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Esocardiomyotomy—Risk Factors and Implications of Intraoperative Mucosal Perforation
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Esocardiomyotomy—Risk Factors and Implications of Intraoperative Mucosal Perforation
title_short Laparoscopic Esocardiomyotomy—Risk Factors and Implications of Intraoperative Mucosal Perforation
title_sort laparoscopic esocardiomyotomy—risk factors and implications of intraoperative mucosal perforation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020340
work_keys_str_mv AT alkadourabdullah laparoscopicesocardiomyotomyriskfactorsandimplicationsofintraoperativemucosalperforation
AT panaitescueugenia laparoscopicesocardiomyotomyriskfactorsandimplicationsofintraoperativemucosalperforation
AT hoarapetre laparoscopicesocardiomyotomyriskfactorsandimplicationsofintraoperativemucosalperforation
AT constantinoiusilviu laparoscopicesocardiomyotomyriskfactorsandimplicationsofintraoperativemucosalperforation
AT mitreatocitumadalina laparoscopicesocardiomyotomyriskfactorsandimplicationsofintraoperativemucosalperforation
AT ciucdiana laparoscopicesocardiomyotomyriskfactorsandimplicationsofintraoperativemucosalperforation
AT dincavaleriugabi laparoscopicesocardiomyotomyriskfactorsandimplicationsofintraoperativemucosalperforation
AT birlarodica laparoscopicesocardiomyotomyriskfactorsandimplicationsofintraoperativemucosalperforation