Cargando…

Towards Radiolabeled EGFR-Specific Peptides: Alternatives to GE11

The human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is closely related to several cancer-promoting processes and overexpressed on a variety of tumor types, rendering it an important target structure for the imaging and therapy of several malignancies. To date, approaches to develop peptidic radioligan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Judmann, Benedikt, Wängler, Björn, Schirrmacher, Ralf, Fricker, Gert, Wängler, Carmen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259420
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16020273
_version_ 1784896366177157120
author Judmann, Benedikt
Wängler, Björn
Schirrmacher, Ralf
Fricker, Gert
Wängler, Carmen
author_facet Judmann, Benedikt
Wängler, Björn
Schirrmacher, Ralf
Fricker, Gert
Wängler, Carmen
author_sort Judmann, Benedikt
collection PubMed
description The human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is closely related to several cancer-promoting processes and overexpressed on a variety of tumor types, rendering it an important target structure for the imaging and therapy of several malignancies. To date, approaches to develop peptidic radioligands able to specifically address and visualize EGFR-positive tumors have been of limited success. Most of the attempts were based on the lead GE11, as this peptide was previously described to be a highly potent EGFR-specific agent. However, since it has recently been shown that GE11 exhibits an insufficient affinity to the EGFR in monomeric form to be suitable as a basis for the development of tracers based on it, in the present work we investigated which other peptides might be suitable as lead structures for the development of EGFR-specific peptidic radiotracers. For this purpose, we developed (68)Ga-labeled radioligands based on the peptides D4, P1, P2, CPP, QRH, EGBP and Pep11, having been described before as EGFR-specific. In addition, we also tested three truncated versions of the endogenous EGFR ligand hEGF (human epidermal growth factor) with respect to their ability to specifically target the EGFR with high affinity. Therefore, chelator-modified labeling precursors of the mentioned peptides were synthesized, radiolabeled with (68)Ga and the obtained radioligands were evaluated for their hydrophilicity/lipophilicity, stability against degradation by human serum peptidases, in vitro tumor cell uptake, and receptor affinity in competitive displacement experiments on EGFR-positive A431 cells. Although all NODA-GA-modified (NODA-GA: (1,4,7-triazacyclononane-4,7-diyl)diacetic acid-1-glutaric acid) labeling precursors could be obtained more or less efficient in yields between 5 and 74%, the (68)Ga-radiolabeling proved to be unsuccessful for two of the three truncated versions of hEGF ([(68)Ga]Ga-8 and [(68)Ga]Ga-9), producing several side-products. For the other agents [(68)Ga]Ga-1–[(68)Ga]Ga-7, [(68)Ga]Ga-10 and [(68)Ga]Ga-11, high radiochemical yields and purities of ≥98% and molar activities of up to 114 GBq/µmol were obtained. In the assay investigating the radiopeptide susceptibilities against serum peptidase degradation, the EGBP-based agent demonstrated a limited stability with a half-life of only 66.4 ± 3.0 min, whereas the other tracers showed considerably higher stabilities of up to an 8000 min half-life. Finally, all radiotracer candidates were evaluated in terms of tumor cell internalization and receptor binding potential on EGFR-positive A431 cell. In these experiments, all developed agents failed to show an EGFR-specific tumor cell uptake or a relevant EGFR-affinity. By contrast, the positive controls tested under identical conditions, [(125)I]I-hEGF and hEGF demonstrated the expected high EGFR-specific tumor cell uptake (33.6% after 1 h, being reduced to 1.9% under blocking conditions) and affinity (IC(50) value of 15.2 ± 3.3 nM). Thus, these results indicate that none of the previously described peptidic agents developed for EGFR targeting appears to be a reasonable choice as a lead structure for the development of radiopeptides for targeting of EGFR-positive tumors. Likewise, the tested truncated variants of the endogenous hEGF do not seem to be promising alternatives for this purpose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9963887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99638872023-02-26 Towards Radiolabeled EGFR-Specific Peptides: Alternatives to GE11 Judmann, Benedikt Wängler, Björn Schirrmacher, Ralf Fricker, Gert Wängler, Carmen Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Article The human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is closely related to several cancer-promoting processes and overexpressed on a variety of tumor types, rendering it an important target structure for the imaging and therapy of several malignancies. To date, approaches to develop peptidic radioligands able to specifically address and visualize EGFR-positive tumors have been of limited success. Most of the attempts were based on the lead GE11, as this peptide was previously described to be a highly potent EGFR-specific agent. However, since it has recently been shown that GE11 exhibits an insufficient affinity to the EGFR in monomeric form to be suitable as a basis for the development of tracers based on it, in the present work we investigated which other peptides might be suitable as lead structures for the development of EGFR-specific peptidic radiotracers. For this purpose, we developed (68)Ga-labeled radioligands based on the peptides D4, P1, P2, CPP, QRH, EGBP and Pep11, having been described before as EGFR-specific. In addition, we also tested three truncated versions of the endogenous EGFR ligand hEGF (human epidermal growth factor) with respect to their ability to specifically target the EGFR with high affinity. Therefore, chelator-modified labeling precursors of the mentioned peptides were synthesized, radiolabeled with (68)Ga and the obtained radioligands were evaluated for their hydrophilicity/lipophilicity, stability against degradation by human serum peptidases, in vitro tumor cell uptake, and receptor affinity in competitive displacement experiments on EGFR-positive A431 cells. Although all NODA-GA-modified (NODA-GA: (1,4,7-triazacyclononane-4,7-diyl)diacetic acid-1-glutaric acid) labeling precursors could be obtained more or less efficient in yields between 5 and 74%, the (68)Ga-radiolabeling proved to be unsuccessful for two of the three truncated versions of hEGF ([(68)Ga]Ga-8 and [(68)Ga]Ga-9), producing several side-products. For the other agents [(68)Ga]Ga-1–[(68)Ga]Ga-7, [(68)Ga]Ga-10 and [(68)Ga]Ga-11, high radiochemical yields and purities of ≥98% and molar activities of up to 114 GBq/µmol were obtained. In the assay investigating the radiopeptide susceptibilities against serum peptidase degradation, the EGBP-based agent demonstrated a limited stability with a half-life of only 66.4 ± 3.0 min, whereas the other tracers showed considerably higher stabilities of up to an 8000 min half-life. Finally, all radiotracer candidates were evaluated in terms of tumor cell internalization and receptor binding potential on EGFR-positive A431 cell. In these experiments, all developed agents failed to show an EGFR-specific tumor cell uptake or a relevant EGFR-affinity. By contrast, the positive controls tested under identical conditions, [(125)I]I-hEGF and hEGF demonstrated the expected high EGFR-specific tumor cell uptake (33.6% after 1 h, being reduced to 1.9% under blocking conditions) and affinity (IC(50) value of 15.2 ± 3.3 nM). Thus, these results indicate that none of the previously described peptidic agents developed for EGFR targeting appears to be a reasonable choice as a lead structure for the development of radiopeptides for targeting of EGFR-positive tumors. Likewise, the tested truncated variants of the endogenous hEGF do not seem to be promising alternatives for this purpose. MDPI 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9963887/ /pubmed/37259420 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16020273 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Judmann, Benedikt
Wängler, Björn
Schirrmacher, Ralf
Fricker, Gert
Wängler, Carmen
Towards Radiolabeled EGFR-Specific Peptides: Alternatives to GE11
title Towards Radiolabeled EGFR-Specific Peptides: Alternatives to GE11
title_full Towards Radiolabeled EGFR-Specific Peptides: Alternatives to GE11
title_fullStr Towards Radiolabeled EGFR-Specific Peptides: Alternatives to GE11
title_full_unstemmed Towards Radiolabeled EGFR-Specific Peptides: Alternatives to GE11
title_short Towards Radiolabeled EGFR-Specific Peptides: Alternatives to GE11
title_sort towards radiolabeled egfr-specific peptides: alternatives to ge11
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259420
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16020273
work_keys_str_mv AT judmannbenedikt towardsradiolabeledegfrspecificpeptidesalternativestoge11
AT wanglerbjorn towardsradiolabeledegfrspecificpeptidesalternativestoge11
AT schirrmacherralf towardsradiolabeledegfrspecificpeptidesalternativestoge11
AT frickergert towardsradiolabeledegfrspecificpeptidesalternativestoge11
AT wanglercarmen towardsradiolabeledegfrspecificpeptidesalternativestoge11