Cargando…

Machine Learning Models Using SHapley Additive exPlanation for Fire Risk Assessment Mode and Effects Analysis of Stadiums

Machine learning methods can establish complex nonlinear relationships between input and response variables for stadium fire risk assessment. However, the output of machine learning models is considered very difficult due to their complex “black box” structure, which hinders their application in sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Ying, Fan, Xiaopeng, Zhang, Yi, Wang, Yong, Jiang, Xuepeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36850757
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23042151
_version_ 1784896395572936704
author Lu, Ying
Fan, Xiaopeng
Zhang, Yi
Wang, Yong
Jiang, Xuepeng
author_facet Lu, Ying
Fan, Xiaopeng
Zhang, Yi
Wang, Yong
Jiang, Xuepeng
author_sort Lu, Ying
collection PubMed
description Machine learning methods can establish complex nonlinear relationships between input and response variables for stadium fire risk assessment. However, the output of machine learning models is considered very difficult due to their complex “black box” structure, which hinders their application in stadium fire risk assessment. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method makes a local approximation to the predictions of any regression or classification model so as to be faithful and interpretable, and assigns significant values (SHAP value) to each input variable for a given prediction. In this study, we designed an indicator attribute threshold interval to classify and quantify different fire risk category data, and then used a random forest model combined with SHAP strategy in order to establish a stadium fire risk assessment model. The main objective is to analyze the impact analysis of each risk characteristic on four different risk assessment models, so as to find the complex nonlinear relationship between risk characteristics and stadium fire risk. This helps managers to be able to make appropriate fire safety management and smart decisions before an incident occurs and in a targeted manner to reduce the incidence of fires. The experimental results show that the established interpretable random forest model provides 83% accuracy, 86% precision, and 85% recall for the stadium fire risk test dataset. The study also shows that the low level of data makes it difficult to identify the range of decision boundaries for Critical mode and Hazardous mode.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9964004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99640042023-02-26 Machine Learning Models Using SHapley Additive exPlanation for Fire Risk Assessment Mode and Effects Analysis of Stadiums Lu, Ying Fan, Xiaopeng Zhang, Yi Wang, Yong Jiang, Xuepeng Sensors (Basel) Article Machine learning methods can establish complex nonlinear relationships between input and response variables for stadium fire risk assessment. However, the output of machine learning models is considered very difficult due to their complex “black box” structure, which hinders their application in stadium fire risk assessment. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method makes a local approximation to the predictions of any regression or classification model so as to be faithful and interpretable, and assigns significant values (SHAP value) to each input variable for a given prediction. In this study, we designed an indicator attribute threshold interval to classify and quantify different fire risk category data, and then used a random forest model combined with SHAP strategy in order to establish a stadium fire risk assessment model. The main objective is to analyze the impact analysis of each risk characteristic on four different risk assessment models, so as to find the complex nonlinear relationship between risk characteristics and stadium fire risk. This helps managers to be able to make appropriate fire safety management and smart decisions before an incident occurs and in a targeted manner to reduce the incidence of fires. The experimental results show that the established interpretable random forest model provides 83% accuracy, 86% precision, and 85% recall for the stadium fire risk test dataset. The study also shows that the low level of data makes it difficult to identify the range of decision boundaries for Critical mode and Hazardous mode. MDPI 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9964004/ /pubmed/36850757 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23042151 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lu, Ying
Fan, Xiaopeng
Zhang, Yi
Wang, Yong
Jiang, Xuepeng
Machine Learning Models Using SHapley Additive exPlanation for Fire Risk Assessment Mode and Effects Analysis of Stadiums
title Machine Learning Models Using SHapley Additive exPlanation for Fire Risk Assessment Mode and Effects Analysis of Stadiums
title_full Machine Learning Models Using SHapley Additive exPlanation for Fire Risk Assessment Mode and Effects Analysis of Stadiums
title_fullStr Machine Learning Models Using SHapley Additive exPlanation for Fire Risk Assessment Mode and Effects Analysis of Stadiums
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Models Using SHapley Additive exPlanation for Fire Risk Assessment Mode and Effects Analysis of Stadiums
title_short Machine Learning Models Using SHapley Additive exPlanation for Fire Risk Assessment Mode and Effects Analysis of Stadiums
title_sort machine learning models using shapley additive explanation for fire risk assessment mode and effects analysis of stadiums
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36850757
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23042151
work_keys_str_mv AT luying machinelearningmodelsusingshapleyadditiveexplanationforfireriskassessmentmodeandeffectsanalysisofstadiums
AT fanxiaopeng machinelearningmodelsusingshapleyadditiveexplanationforfireriskassessmentmodeandeffectsanalysisofstadiums
AT zhangyi machinelearningmodelsusingshapleyadditiveexplanationforfireriskassessmentmodeandeffectsanalysisofstadiums
AT wangyong machinelearningmodelsusingshapleyadditiveexplanationforfireriskassessmentmodeandeffectsanalysisofstadiums
AT jiangxuepeng machinelearningmodelsusingshapleyadditiveexplanationforfireriskassessmentmodeandeffectsanalysisofstadiums