Cargando…

Effect of the Interface/Interphase on the Water Ingress Properties of Joints with PBT-GF30 and Aluminum Substrates Using Silicone Adhesive

The aim of this work is to analyze the difference between silicone/composite and silicone/metal interphases, both in terms of water diffusion behavior and failure of the aged joints. For that, silicone joints with two different suhbstrates were prepared. The substrates were polybutylene terephthalat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borges, Catarina S. P., Marques, Eduardo A. S., Carbas, Ricardo J. C., Akhavan-Safar, Alireza, Ueffing, Christoph, Weißgraeber, Philipp, da Silva, Lucas F. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36850072
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15040788
_version_ 1784896413747904512
author Borges, Catarina S. P.
Marques, Eduardo A. S.
Carbas, Ricardo J. C.
Akhavan-Safar, Alireza
Ueffing, Christoph
Weißgraeber, Philipp
da Silva, Lucas F. M.
author_facet Borges, Catarina S. P.
Marques, Eduardo A. S.
Carbas, Ricardo J. C.
Akhavan-Safar, Alireza
Ueffing, Christoph
Weißgraeber, Philipp
da Silva, Lucas F. M.
author_sort Borges, Catarina S. P.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this work is to analyze the difference between silicone/composite and silicone/metal interphases, both in terms of water diffusion behavior and failure of the aged joints. For that, silicone joints with two different suhbstrates were prepared. The substrates were polybutylene terephthalate with 30% of short glass fiber (PBT-GF30) and 6082-T6 aluminum. It is assumed that the water uptake of the joints is equal to the water uptake of the substrate, adhesive, and interphase. Therefore, knowing the first three, the last could be isolated. To study the water diffusion behavior of the complete joint, rectangular joints were prepared, immersed in water and their water uptake was measured. The water immersion was conducted at 70 °C. It was concluded that the aluminum/silicone joints absorbed more water through the interphase region than the PBT-GF30/silicone joints, since the difference between the expected water uptake and the experimentally measured mass gain is significantly higher, causing adhesive failure of the joint. The same was not observed in the PBT-GF30/silicone, with a more stable interphase, that does not absorb measurable quantities of water and always exhibits cohesive failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9964078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99640782023-02-26 Effect of the Interface/Interphase on the Water Ingress Properties of Joints with PBT-GF30 and Aluminum Substrates Using Silicone Adhesive Borges, Catarina S. P. Marques, Eduardo A. S. Carbas, Ricardo J. C. Akhavan-Safar, Alireza Ueffing, Christoph Weißgraeber, Philipp da Silva, Lucas F. M. Polymers (Basel) Article The aim of this work is to analyze the difference between silicone/composite and silicone/metal interphases, both in terms of water diffusion behavior and failure of the aged joints. For that, silicone joints with two different suhbstrates were prepared. The substrates were polybutylene terephthalate with 30% of short glass fiber (PBT-GF30) and 6082-T6 aluminum. It is assumed that the water uptake of the joints is equal to the water uptake of the substrate, adhesive, and interphase. Therefore, knowing the first three, the last could be isolated. To study the water diffusion behavior of the complete joint, rectangular joints were prepared, immersed in water and their water uptake was measured. The water immersion was conducted at 70 °C. It was concluded that the aluminum/silicone joints absorbed more water through the interphase region than the PBT-GF30/silicone joints, since the difference between the expected water uptake and the experimentally measured mass gain is significantly higher, causing adhesive failure of the joint. The same was not observed in the PBT-GF30/silicone, with a more stable interphase, that does not absorb measurable quantities of water and always exhibits cohesive failure. MDPI 2023-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9964078/ /pubmed/36850072 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15040788 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Borges, Catarina S. P.
Marques, Eduardo A. S.
Carbas, Ricardo J. C.
Akhavan-Safar, Alireza
Ueffing, Christoph
Weißgraeber, Philipp
da Silva, Lucas F. M.
Effect of the Interface/Interphase on the Water Ingress Properties of Joints with PBT-GF30 and Aluminum Substrates Using Silicone Adhesive
title Effect of the Interface/Interphase on the Water Ingress Properties of Joints with PBT-GF30 and Aluminum Substrates Using Silicone Adhesive
title_full Effect of the Interface/Interphase on the Water Ingress Properties of Joints with PBT-GF30 and Aluminum Substrates Using Silicone Adhesive
title_fullStr Effect of the Interface/Interphase on the Water Ingress Properties of Joints with PBT-GF30 and Aluminum Substrates Using Silicone Adhesive
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the Interface/Interphase on the Water Ingress Properties of Joints with PBT-GF30 and Aluminum Substrates Using Silicone Adhesive
title_short Effect of the Interface/Interphase on the Water Ingress Properties of Joints with PBT-GF30 and Aluminum Substrates Using Silicone Adhesive
title_sort effect of the interface/interphase on the water ingress properties of joints with pbt-gf30 and aluminum substrates using silicone adhesive
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36850072
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15040788
work_keys_str_mv AT borgescatarinasp effectoftheinterfaceinterphaseonthewateringresspropertiesofjointswithpbtgf30andaluminumsubstratesusingsiliconeadhesive
AT marqueseduardoas effectoftheinterfaceinterphaseonthewateringresspropertiesofjointswithpbtgf30andaluminumsubstratesusingsiliconeadhesive
AT carbasricardojc effectoftheinterfaceinterphaseonthewateringresspropertiesofjointswithpbtgf30andaluminumsubstratesusingsiliconeadhesive
AT akhavansafaralireza effectoftheinterfaceinterphaseonthewateringresspropertiesofjointswithpbtgf30andaluminumsubstratesusingsiliconeadhesive
AT ueffingchristoph effectoftheinterfaceinterphaseonthewateringresspropertiesofjointswithpbtgf30andaluminumsubstratesusingsiliconeadhesive
AT weißgraeberphilipp effectoftheinterfaceinterphaseonthewateringresspropertiesofjointswithpbtgf30andaluminumsubstratesusingsiliconeadhesive
AT dasilvalucasfm effectoftheinterfaceinterphaseonthewateringresspropertiesofjointswithpbtgf30andaluminumsubstratesusingsiliconeadhesive