Cargando…

Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: “One Does Not Fit All”

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) uses different energy spectrum x-ray beams for differentiating materials with similar attenuation at a certain energy. Compared with single-energy CT, it provides images with better diagnostic performance and a potential reduction of contrast agent and radiatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borges, Ana P., Antunes, Célia, Curvo-Semedo, Luís
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36828369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9010017
_version_ 1784896452727668736
author Borges, Ana P.
Antunes, Célia
Curvo-Semedo, Luís
author_facet Borges, Ana P.
Antunes, Célia
Curvo-Semedo, Luís
author_sort Borges, Ana P.
collection PubMed
description Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) uses different energy spectrum x-ray beams for differentiating materials with similar attenuation at a certain energy. Compared with single-energy CT, it provides images with better diagnostic performance and a potential reduction of contrast agent and radiation doses. There are different commercially available DECT technologies, with machines that may display two x-ray sources and two detectors, a single source capable of fast switching between two energy levels, a specialized detector capable of acquiring high- and low-energy data sets, and a filter splitting the beam into high- and low-energy beams at the output. Sequential acquisition at different tube voltages is an alternative approach. This narrative review describes the DECT technique using a Q&A format and visual representations. Physical concepts, parameters influencing image quality, postprocessing methods, applicability in daily routine workflow, and radiation considerations are discussed. Differences between scanners are described, regarding design, image quality variabilities, and their advantages and limitations. Additionally, current clinical applications are listed, and future perspectives for spectral CT imaging are addressed. Acknowledging the strengths and weaknesses of different DECT scanners is important, as these could be adapted to each patient, clinical scenario, and financial capability. This technology is undoubtedly valuable and will certainly keep improving.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9964233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99642332023-02-26 Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: “One Does Not Fit All” Borges, Ana P. Antunes, Célia Curvo-Semedo, Luís Tomography Review Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) uses different energy spectrum x-ray beams for differentiating materials with similar attenuation at a certain energy. Compared with single-energy CT, it provides images with better diagnostic performance and a potential reduction of contrast agent and radiation doses. There are different commercially available DECT technologies, with machines that may display two x-ray sources and two detectors, a single source capable of fast switching between two energy levels, a specialized detector capable of acquiring high- and low-energy data sets, and a filter splitting the beam into high- and low-energy beams at the output. Sequential acquisition at different tube voltages is an alternative approach. This narrative review describes the DECT technique using a Q&A format and visual representations. Physical concepts, parameters influencing image quality, postprocessing methods, applicability in daily routine workflow, and radiation considerations are discussed. Differences between scanners are described, regarding design, image quality variabilities, and their advantages and limitations. Additionally, current clinical applications are listed, and future perspectives for spectral CT imaging are addressed. Acknowledging the strengths and weaknesses of different DECT scanners is important, as these could be adapted to each patient, clinical scenario, and financial capability. This technology is undoubtedly valuable and will certainly keep improving. MDPI 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9964233/ /pubmed/36828369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9010017 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Borges, Ana P.
Antunes, Célia
Curvo-Semedo, Luís
Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: “One Does Not Fit All”
title Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: “One Does Not Fit All”
title_full Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: “One Does Not Fit All”
title_fullStr Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: “One Does Not Fit All”
title_full_unstemmed Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: “One Does Not Fit All”
title_short Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: “One Does Not Fit All”
title_sort pros and cons of dual-energy ct systems: “one does not fit all”
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36828369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9010017
work_keys_str_mv AT borgesanap prosandconsofdualenergyctsystemsonedoesnotfitall
AT antunescelia prosandconsofdualenergyctsystemsonedoesnotfitall
AT curvosemedoluis prosandconsofdualenergyctsystemsonedoesnotfitall