Cargando…

Non-Lethal Detection of Ranavirus in Fish

Emergent infectious diseases have an increasing impact on both farmed animals and wildlife. The ability to screen for pathogens is critical for understanding host–pathogen dynamics and informing better management. Ranavirus is a pathogen of concern, associated with disease outbreaks worldwide, affec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coutinho, Catarina D., Ford, Charlotte E., Trafford, Joseph D., Duarte, Ana, Rebelo, Rui, Rosa, Gonçalo M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36851684
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15020471
_version_ 1784896557955416064
author Coutinho, Catarina D.
Ford, Charlotte E.
Trafford, Joseph D.
Duarte, Ana
Rebelo, Rui
Rosa, Gonçalo M.
author_facet Coutinho, Catarina D.
Ford, Charlotte E.
Trafford, Joseph D.
Duarte, Ana
Rebelo, Rui
Rosa, Gonçalo M.
author_sort Coutinho, Catarina D.
collection PubMed
description Emergent infectious diseases have an increasing impact on both farmed animals and wildlife. The ability to screen for pathogens is critical for understanding host–pathogen dynamics and informing better management. Ranavirus is a pathogen of concern, associated with disease outbreaks worldwide, affecting a broad range of fish, amphibian, and reptile hosts, but research has been limited. The traditional screening of internal tissues, such as the liver, has been regarded as the most effective for detecting and quantifying Ranavirus. However, such methodology imposes several limitations from ethical and conservation standpoints. Non-lethal sampling methods of viral detection were explored by comparing the efficacy of both buccal swabbing and fin clipping. The study was conducted on two Iberian, threatened freshwater fish (Iberochondrostoma lusitanicum and Cobitis paludica), and all samples were screened using qPCR. While for C. paludica both methods were reliable in detecting Ranavirus, on I. lusitanicum, there was a significantly higher detection rate in buccal swabs than in fin tissue. This study, therefore, reports that fin clipping may yield false Ranavirus negatives when in small-bodied freshwater fish. Overall, buccal swabbing is found to be good as an alternative to more invasive procedures, which is of extreme relevance, particularly when dealing with a threatened species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9964643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99646432023-02-26 Non-Lethal Detection of Ranavirus in Fish Coutinho, Catarina D. Ford, Charlotte E. Trafford, Joseph D. Duarte, Ana Rebelo, Rui Rosa, Gonçalo M. Viruses Brief Report Emergent infectious diseases have an increasing impact on both farmed animals and wildlife. The ability to screen for pathogens is critical for understanding host–pathogen dynamics and informing better management. Ranavirus is a pathogen of concern, associated with disease outbreaks worldwide, affecting a broad range of fish, amphibian, and reptile hosts, but research has been limited. The traditional screening of internal tissues, such as the liver, has been regarded as the most effective for detecting and quantifying Ranavirus. However, such methodology imposes several limitations from ethical and conservation standpoints. Non-lethal sampling methods of viral detection were explored by comparing the efficacy of both buccal swabbing and fin clipping. The study was conducted on two Iberian, threatened freshwater fish (Iberochondrostoma lusitanicum and Cobitis paludica), and all samples were screened using qPCR. While for C. paludica both methods were reliable in detecting Ranavirus, on I. lusitanicum, there was a significantly higher detection rate in buccal swabs than in fin tissue. This study, therefore, reports that fin clipping may yield false Ranavirus negatives when in small-bodied freshwater fish. Overall, buccal swabbing is found to be good as an alternative to more invasive procedures, which is of extreme relevance, particularly when dealing with a threatened species. MDPI 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9964643/ /pubmed/36851684 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15020471 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Coutinho, Catarina D.
Ford, Charlotte E.
Trafford, Joseph D.
Duarte, Ana
Rebelo, Rui
Rosa, Gonçalo M.
Non-Lethal Detection of Ranavirus in Fish
title Non-Lethal Detection of Ranavirus in Fish
title_full Non-Lethal Detection of Ranavirus in Fish
title_fullStr Non-Lethal Detection of Ranavirus in Fish
title_full_unstemmed Non-Lethal Detection of Ranavirus in Fish
title_short Non-Lethal Detection of Ranavirus in Fish
title_sort non-lethal detection of ranavirus in fish
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36851684
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15020471
work_keys_str_mv AT coutinhocatarinad nonlethaldetectionofranavirusinfish
AT fordcharlottee nonlethaldetectionofranavirusinfish
AT traffordjosephd nonlethaldetectionofranavirusinfish
AT duarteana nonlethaldetectionofranavirusinfish
AT rebelorui nonlethaldetectionofranavirusinfish
AT rosagoncalom nonlethaldetectionofranavirusinfish