Cargando…

Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient

Background: Online health information (OHI) has become widely accessible and affects patient decisions regarding their healthcare. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability, quality, and accuracy of information available to patients online about penile prosthesis implants (PPIs). Metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plambeck, Benjamin, Jiang, Jinfeng, Perez, Jesus, Wordekemper, Brittany E, Fu, David, Colvin, Alexandra, Deibert, Christopher M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852349
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34240
_version_ 1784896576659914752
author Plambeck, Benjamin
Jiang, Jinfeng
Perez, Jesus
Wordekemper, Brittany E
Fu, David
Colvin, Alexandra
Deibert, Christopher M
author_facet Plambeck, Benjamin
Jiang, Jinfeng
Perez, Jesus
Wordekemper, Brittany E
Fu, David
Colvin, Alexandra
Deibert, Christopher M
author_sort Plambeck, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description Background: Online health information (OHI) has become widely accessible and affects patient decisions regarding their healthcare. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability, quality, and accuracy of information available to patients online about penile prosthesis implants (PPIs). Methods: We performed a Google search using the keywords “penile implant” and “penile prosthesis.” The first 30 search results for both terms were analyzed, and advertisements, news articles, duplicates, and videos were excluded. Websites were categorized as institutional, commercial, and personal/patient support. Readability of each website was determined using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL) readability formula within the readable tool. Quality was measured by Health On the Net (HON) certification status and the DISCERN scoring method. For website accuracy, a score of 1-4 (1=0-25%, 2=25-50%, 3=50-75%, and 4=75-100%) was assigned. Results: Forty-four websites met the criteria (23 institutional, 12 commercial, and 9 personal/patient support). The mean total FKGL score was 9.55. No statistical difference was detected between mean FKGL for each website category (p=0.69). Only eight websites (18%) scored ≤8th-grade reading level (average US adult level), while 36 (82%) were >8th-grade level. Mean total DISCERN sum score was 39.74/75, with no statistical difference in mean DISCERN score between website types (p=0.08). Over half (55%) of the websites were defined as “very poor” or “poor” quality by DISCERN scoring. Mean total overall quality rating was 2.67/5. HON certification was verified for only nine websites (20%). Twenty-five percent of websites were classified as 0-25% accurate, 23% were 25-50% accurate, 30% were 50-75% accurate, and 23% were 75-100% accurate. Conclusion: Most information on the Internet about PPIs is reasonably accurate; however, the majority of websites are deficient in quality and unreadable to the average patient, irrespective of website type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9964715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99647152023-02-26 Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient Plambeck, Benjamin Jiang, Jinfeng Perez, Jesus Wordekemper, Brittany E Fu, David Colvin, Alexandra Deibert, Christopher M Cureus Urology Background: Online health information (OHI) has become widely accessible and affects patient decisions regarding their healthcare. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability, quality, and accuracy of information available to patients online about penile prosthesis implants (PPIs). Methods: We performed a Google search using the keywords “penile implant” and “penile prosthesis.” The first 30 search results for both terms were analyzed, and advertisements, news articles, duplicates, and videos were excluded. Websites were categorized as institutional, commercial, and personal/patient support. Readability of each website was determined using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL) readability formula within the readable tool. Quality was measured by Health On the Net (HON) certification status and the DISCERN scoring method. For website accuracy, a score of 1-4 (1=0-25%, 2=25-50%, 3=50-75%, and 4=75-100%) was assigned. Results: Forty-four websites met the criteria (23 institutional, 12 commercial, and 9 personal/patient support). The mean total FKGL score was 9.55. No statistical difference was detected between mean FKGL for each website category (p=0.69). Only eight websites (18%) scored ≤8th-grade reading level (average US adult level), while 36 (82%) were >8th-grade level. Mean total DISCERN sum score was 39.74/75, with no statistical difference in mean DISCERN score between website types (p=0.08). Over half (55%) of the websites were defined as “very poor” or “poor” quality by DISCERN scoring. Mean total overall quality rating was 2.67/5. HON certification was verified for only nine websites (20%). Twenty-five percent of websites were classified as 0-25% accurate, 23% were 25-50% accurate, 30% were 50-75% accurate, and 23% were 75-100% accurate. Conclusion: Most information on the Internet about PPIs is reasonably accurate; however, the majority of websites are deficient in quality and unreadable to the average patient, irrespective of website type. Cureus 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9964715/ /pubmed/36852349 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34240 Text en Copyright © 2023, Plambeck et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Urology
Plambeck, Benjamin
Jiang, Jinfeng
Perez, Jesus
Wordekemper, Brittany E
Fu, David
Colvin, Alexandra
Deibert, Christopher M
Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient
title Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient
title_full Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient
title_fullStr Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient
title_full_unstemmed Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient
title_short Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient
title_sort online health information for penile prosthesis implants lacks quality and is unreadable to the average us patient
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852349
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34240
work_keys_str_mv AT plambeckbenjamin onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient
AT jiangjinfeng onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient
AT perezjesus onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient
AT wordekemperbrittanye onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient
AT fudavid onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient
AT colvinalexandra onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient
AT deibertchristopherm onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient