Cargando…
Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient
Background: Online health information (OHI) has become widely accessible and affects patient decisions regarding their healthcare. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability, quality, and accuracy of information available to patients online about penile prosthesis implants (PPIs). Metho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852349 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34240 |
_version_ | 1784896576659914752 |
---|---|
author | Plambeck, Benjamin Jiang, Jinfeng Perez, Jesus Wordekemper, Brittany E Fu, David Colvin, Alexandra Deibert, Christopher M |
author_facet | Plambeck, Benjamin Jiang, Jinfeng Perez, Jesus Wordekemper, Brittany E Fu, David Colvin, Alexandra Deibert, Christopher M |
author_sort | Plambeck, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Online health information (OHI) has become widely accessible and affects patient decisions regarding their healthcare. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability, quality, and accuracy of information available to patients online about penile prosthesis implants (PPIs). Methods: We performed a Google search using the keywords “penile implant” and “penile prosthesis.” The first 30 search results for both terms were analyzed, and advertisements, news articles, duplicates, and videos were excluded. Websites were categorized as institutional, commercial, and personal/patient support. Readability of each website was determined using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL) readability formula within the readable tool. Quality was measured by Health On the Net (HON) certification status and the DISCERN scoring method. For website accuracy, a score of 1-4 (1=0-25%, 2=25-50%, 3=50-75%, and 4=75-100%) was assigned. Results: Forty-four websites met the criteria (23 institutional, 12 commercial, and 9 personal/patient support). The mean total FKGL score was 9.55. No statistical difference was detected between mean FKGL for each website category (p=0.69). Only eight websites (18%) scored ≤8th-grade reading level (average US adult level), while 36 (82%) were >8th-grade level. Mean total DISCERN sum score was 39.74/75, with no statistical difference in mean DISCERN score between website types (p=0.08). Over half (55%) of the websites were defined as “very poor” or “poor” quality by DISCERN scoring. Mean total overall quality rating was 2.67/5. HON certification was verified for only nine websites (20%). Twenty-five percent of websites were classified as 0-25% accurate, 23% were 25-50% accurate, 30% were 50-75% accurate, and 23% were 75-100% accurate. Conclusion: Most information on the Internet about PPIs is reasonably accurate; however, the majority of websites are deficient in quality and unreadable to the average patient, irrespective of website type. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9964715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99647152023-02-26 Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient Plambeck, Benjamin Jiang, Jinfeng Perez, Jesus Wordekemper, Brittany E Fu, David Colvin, Alexandra Deibert, Christopher M Cureus Urology Background: Online health information (OHI) has become widely accessible and affects patient decisions regarding their healthcare. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability, quality, and accuracy of information available to patients online about penile prosthesis implants (PPIs). Methods: We performed a Google search using the keywords “penile implant” and “penile prosthesis.” The first 30 search results for both terms were analyzed, and advertisements, news articles, duplicates, and videos were excluded. Websites were categorized as institutional, commercial, and personal/patient support. Readability of each website was determined using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL) readability formula within the readable tool. Quality was measured by Health On the Net (HON) certification status and the DISCERN scoring method. For website accuracy, a score of 1-4 (1=0-25%, 2=25-50%, 3=50-75%, and 4=75-100%) was assigned. Results: Forty-four websites met the criteria (23 institutional, 12 commercial, and 9 personal/patient support). The mean total FKGL score was 9.55. No statistical difference was detected between mean FKGL for each website category (p=0.69). Only eight websites (18%) scored ≤8th-grade reading level (average US adult level), while 36 (82%) were >8th-grade level. Mean total DISCERN sum score was 39.74/75, with no statistical difference in mean DISCERN score between website types (p=0.08). Over half (55%) of the websites were defined as “very poor” or “poor” quality by DISCERN scoring. Mean total overall quality rating was 2.67/5. HON certification was verified for only nine websites (20%). Twenty-five percent of websites were classified as 0-25% accurate, 23% were 25-50% accurate, 30% were 50-75% accurate, and 23% were 75-100% accurate. Conclusion: Most information on the Internet about PPIs is reasonably accurate; however, the majority of websites are deficient in quality and unreadable to the average patient, irrespective of website type. Cureus 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9964715/ /pubmed/36852349 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34240 Text en Copyright © 2023, Plambeck et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Urology Plambeck, Benjamin Jiang, Jinfeng Perez, Jesus Wordekemper, Brittany E Fu, David Colvin, Alexandra Deibert, Christopher M Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient |
title | Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient |
title_full | Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient |
title_fullStr | Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient |
title_full_unstemmed | Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient |
title_short | Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient |
title_sort | online health information for penile prosthesis implants lacks quality and is unreadable to the average us patient |
topic | Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9964715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852349 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT plambeckbenjamin onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient AT jiangjinfeng onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient AT perezjesus onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient AT wordekemperbrittanye onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient AT fudavid onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient AT colvinalexandra onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient AT deibertchristopherm onlinehealthinformationforpenileprosthesisimplantslacksqualityandisunreadabletotheaverageuspatient |