Cargando…

Reliability of a Custom Device Used to Measure Isometric Knee Flexor and Extensor Strength in Standing Position

Background: Assessing lower limb strength in the field is problematic, as the “gold standard assessment” with isokinetic strength is cumbersome, and the device is costly and not transportable and keeps the angle of the hip at around 90°. Methods: We evaluated isometric muscle strength in a standing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minuti, Tommaso, Cigni, Paolo, Costagli, Michele, Cucini, Alessandro, Cione, Erika, Melotto, Samuele, Rapetti, Stefano, Ricotti, Leonardo, Cannataro, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836815
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020458
_version_ 1784896659024510976
author Minuti, Tommaso
Cigni, Paolo
Costagli, Michele
Cucini, Alessandro
Cione, Erika
Melotto, Samuele
Rapetti, Stefano
Ricotti, Leonardo
Cannataro, Roberto
author_facet Minuti, Tommaso
Cigni, Paolo
Costagli, Michele
Cucini, Alessandro
Cione, Erika
Melotto, Samuele
Rapetti, Stefano
Ricotti, Leonardo
Cannataro, Roberto
author_sort Minuti, Tommaso
collection PubMed
description Background: Assessing lower limb strength in the field is problematic, as the “gold standard assessment” with isokinetic strength is cumbersome, and the device is costly and not transportable and keeps the angle of the hip at around 90°. Methods: We evaluated isometric muscle strength in a standing position with the help of an exoskeleton that holds the subject and makes the test easily repeatable. Results: The optimal device angles for hip and knee were, respectively, 20° and 80° for flexor tests and 30° and 40° for extensor tests. Test–retest reliability was very high for the right knee extensor (ICC 0.96–0.98), left knee extensor (ICC 0.96–0.97), right knee flexor (ICC 0.91–0.96), and left knee flexor (ICC 0.96–0.97). Furthermore, the typical error in percent (T.E.%) ranged from 2.50 to 5.50%, and the change in the mean in percent ranged from 0.84 to 7.72%, making it possible to determine even a slight variation in force. Conclusions: this new method could represent a valid alternative for assessing strength, due to the high reliability and the favorable joint position, particularly in football.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9965042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99650422023-02-26 Reliability of a Custom Device Used to Measure Isometric Knee Flexor and Extensor Strength in Standing Position Minuti, Tommaso Cigni, Paolo Costagli, Michele Cucini, Alessandro Cione, Erika Melotto, Samuele Rapetti, Stefano Ricotti, Leonardo Cannataro, Roberto Life (Basel) Article Background: Assessing lower limb strength in the field is problematic, as the “gold standard assessment” with isokinetic strength is cumbersome, and the device is costly and not transportable and keeps the angle of the hip at around 90°. Methods: We evaluated isometric muscle strength in a standing position with the help of an exoskeleton that holds the subject and makes the test easily repeatable. Results: The optimal device angles for hip and knee were, respectively, 20° and 80° for flexor tests and 30° and 40° for extensor tests. Test–retest reliability was very high for the right knee extensor (ICC 0.96–0.98), left knee extensor (ICC 0.96–0.97), right knee flexor (ICC 0.91–0.96), and left knee flexor (ICC 0.96–0.97). Furthermore, the typical error in percent (T.E.%) ranged from 2.50 to 5.50%, and the change in the mean in percent ranged from 0.84 to 7.72%, making it possible to determine even a slight variation in force. Conclusions: this new method could represent a valid alternative for assessing strength, due to the high reliability and the favorable joint position, particularly in football. MDPI 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9965042/ /pubmed/36836815 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020458 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Minuti, Tommaso
Cigni, Paolo
Costagli, Michele
Cucini, Alessandro
Cione, Erika
Melotto, Samuele
Rapetti, Stefano
Ricotti, Leonardo
Cannataro, Roberto
Reliability of a Custom Device Used to Measure Isometric Knee Flexor and Extensor Strength in Standing Position
title Reliability of a Custom Device Used to Measure Isometric Knee Flexor and Extensor Strength in Standing Position
title_full Reliability of a Custom Device Used to Measure Isometric Knee Flexor and Extensor Strength in Standing Position
title_fullStr Reliability of a Custom Device Used to Measure Isometric Knee Flexor and Extensor Strength in Standing Position
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of a Custom Device Used to Measure Isometric Knee Flexor and Extensor Strength in Standing Position
title_short Reliability of a Custom Device Used to Measure Isometric Knee Flexor and Extensor Strength in Standing Position
title_sort reliability of a custom device used to measure isometric knee flexor and extensor strength in standing position
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836815
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020458
work_keys_str_mv AT minutitommaso reliabilityofacustomdeviceusedtomeasureisometrickneeflexorandextensorstrengthinstandingposition
AT cignipaolo reliabilityofacustomdeviceusedtomeasureisometrickneeflexorandextensorstrengthinstandingposition
AT costaglimichele reliabilityofacustomdeviceusedtomeasureisometrickneeflexorandextensorstrengthinstandingposition
AT cucinialessandro reliabilityofacustomdeviceusedtomeasureisometrickneeflexorandextensorstrengthinstandingposition
AT cioneerika reliabilityofacustomdeviceusedtomeasureisometrickneeflexorandextensorstrengthinstandingposition
AT melottosamuele reliabilityofacustomdeviceusedtomeasureisometrickneeflexorandextensorstrengthinstandingposition
AT rapettistefano reliabilityofacustomdeviceusedtomeasureisometrickneeflexorandextensorstrengthinstandingposition
AT ricottileonardo reliabilityofacustomdeviceusedtomeasureisometrickneeflexorandextensorstrengthinstandingposition
AT cannataroroberto reliabilityofacustomdeviceusedtomeasureisometrickneeflexorandextensorstrengthinstandingposition