Cargando…
Post-Operative Quality of Life after Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment Employing Three Different Instrumentation Techniques—An Institutional Randomized Clinical Trial
Root canal treatment (RCT) eliminates damaged pulpal tissue and protects the tooth from recurrent microbial invasion. Post-endodontic pain (PEP) is a frequently encountered complication of root canal therapy. It can have an impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and their subjective perception of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041535 |
_version_ | 1784896717158612992 |
---|---|
author | Shetty, Vathsalya Yelke, Shalini Wahjuningrum, Dian Agustin Luke, Alexander Maniangat Testarelli, Luca Giardino, Luciano Pawar, Ajinkya M. |
author_facet | Shetty, Vathsalya Yelke, Shalini Wahjuningrum, Dian Agustin Luke, Alexander Maniangat Testarelli, Luca Giardino, Luciano Pawar, Ajinkya M. |
author_sort | Shetty, Vathsalya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Root canal treatment (RCT) eliminates damaged pulpal tissue and protects the tooth from recurrent microbial invasion. Post-endodontic pain (PEP) is a frequently encountered complication of root canal therapy. It can have an impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and their subjective perception of treatment options. Thus, a self-assessment questionnaire was used to evaluate and compare the influence of manual, rotary, and reciprocating file shaping procedures on immediate post-operative quality of life (POQoL) involving single-visit root canal therapy. It was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. A total of 120 participants were randomly assigned sequentially to three groups comprising 40 patients in each group: Group A: Hand K file (positive control); Group B: ProTaper Next file system; and Group C: WaveOne Gold. Post-operative pain was evaluated using a 4-point visual analog scale (VAS) after 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 1 week. The highest post-operative pain was with manual instrumentation using hand K files, and the lowest was with reciprocating and rotating instrumentations. No significant difference was noted between the parameters of quality of life assessed, suggesting the filing system or technique had a similar effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9965264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99652642023-02-26 Post-Operative Quality of Life after Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment Employing Three Different Instrumentation Techniques—An Institutional Randomized Clinical Trial Shetty, Vathsalya Yelke, Shalini Wahjuningrum, Dian Agustin Luke, Alexander Maniangat Testarelli, Luca Giardino, Luciano Pawar, Ajinkya M. J Clin Med Article Root canal treatment (RCT) eliminates damaged pulpal tissue and protects the tooth from recurrent microbial invasion. Post-endodontic pain (PEP) is a frequently encountered complication of root canal therapy. It can have an impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and their subjective perception of treatment options. Thus, a self-assessment questionnaire was used to evaluate and compare the influence of manual, rotary, and reciprocating file shaping procedures on immediate post-operative quality of life (POQoL) involving single-visit root canal therapy. It was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. A total of 120 participants were randomly assigned sequentially to three groups comprising 40 patients in each group: Group A: Hand K file (positive control); Group B: ProTaper Next file system; and Group C: WaveOne Gold. Post-operative pain was evaluated using a 4-point visual analog scale (VAS) after 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 1 week. The highest post-operative pain was with manual instrumentation using hand K files, and the lowest was with reciprocating and rotating instrumentations. No significant difference was noted between the parameters of quality of life assessed, suggesting the filing system or technique had a similar effect. MDPI 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9965264/ /pubmed/36836070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041535 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shetty, Vathsalya Yelke, Shalini Wahjuningrum, Dian Agustin Luke, Alexander Maniangat Testarelli, Luca Giardino, Luciano Pawar, Ajinkya M. Post-Operative Quality of Life after Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment Employing Three Different Instrumentation Techniques—An Institutional Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Post-Operative Quality of Life after Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment Employing Three Different Instrumentation Techniques—An Institutional Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Post-Operative Quality of Life after Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment Employing Three Different Instrumentation Techniques—An Institutional Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Post-Operative Quality of Life after Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment Employing Three Different Instrumentation Techniques—An Institutional Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-Operative Quality of Life after Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment Employing Three Different Instrumentation Techniques—An Institutional Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Post-Operative Quality of Life after Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment Employing Three Different Instrumentation Techniques—An Institutional Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | post-operative quality of life after single-visit root canal treatment employing three different instrumentation techniques—an institutional randomized clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041535 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shettyvathsalya postoperativequalityoflifeaftersinglevisitrootcanaltreatmentemployingthreedifferentinstrumentationtechniquesaninstitutionalrandomizedclinicaltrial AT yelkeshalini postoperativequalityoflifeaftersinglevisitrootcanaltreatmentemployingthreedifferentinstrumentationtechniquesaninstitutionalrandomizedclinicaltrial AT wahjuningrumdianagustin postoperativequalityoflifeaftersinglevisitrootcanaltreatmentemployingthreedifferentinstrumentationtechniquesaninstitutionalrandomizedclinicaltrial AT lukealexandermaniangat postoperativequalityoflifeaftersinglevisitrootcanaltreatmentemployingthreedifferentinstrumentationtechniquesaninstitutionalrandomizedclinicaltrial AT testarelliluca postoperativequalityoflifeaftersinglevisitrootcanaltreatmentemployingthreedifferentinstrumentationtechniquesaninstitutionalrandomizedclinicaltrial AT giardinoluciano postoperativequalityoflifeaftersinglevisitrootcanaltreatmentemployingthreedifferentinstrumentationtechniquesaninstitutionalrandomizedclinicaltrial AT pawarajinkyam postoperativequalityoflifeaftersinglevisitrootcanaltreatmentemployingthreedifferentinstrumentationtechniquesaninstitutionalrandomizedclinicaltrial |