Cargando…

Intestinal Microbiota Differences in Litopenaeus vannamei Shrimp between Greenhouse and Aquaponic Rearing

The sustainability of shrimp aquaculture can be achieved through the development of greenhouse and aquaponic rearing modes, which are classified as heterotrophic and autotrophic bacterial aquaculture systems. However, there have been few investigations into the discrepancies between the intestinal a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dou, Yabin, Wen, Mengying, Shen, Hui, Zhang, Sheng, Jiang, Ge, Qiao, Yi, Cheng, Jie, Cao, Xiaohui, Wan, Xihe, Sun, Xiaoman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020525
_version_ 1784896787717292032
author Dou, Yabin
Wen, Mengying
Shen, Hui
Zhang, Sheng
Jiang, Ge
Qiao, Yi
Cheng, Jie
Cao, Xiaohui
Wan, Xihe
Sun, Xiaoman
author_facet Dou, Yabin
Wen, Mengying
Shen, Hui
Zhang, Sheng
Jiang, Ge
Qiao, Yi
Cheng, Jie
Cao, Xiaohui
Wan, Xihe
Sun, Xiaoman
author_sort Dou, Yabin
collection PubMed
description The sustainability of shrimp aquaculture can be achieved through the development of greenhouse and aquaponic rearing modes, which are classified as heterotrophic and autotrophic bacterial aquaculture systems. However, there have been few investigations into the discrepancies between the intestinal and water microbiota of these two rearing methods. In this study, we collected shrimp samples from greenhouse-rearing (WG) and aquaponic-rearing (YG) ponds, and water samples (WE, YE), and investigated the intestinal and water microbiota between the two rearing modes. The results, through alpha and beta diversity analyses, reveal that there was basically no significant difference between shrimp intestine WG and YG (p > 0.05) or between rearing water WE and YE (p > 0.05). At the phylum and genus levels, the common bacteria between WE and WG differed significantly from those of YE and YG. The analysis of the top six phyla shows that Proteobacteria and Patescibacteria were significantly more abundant in the WG group than those in the YG group (p < 0.05). Conversely, Actinobacteriota, Firmicutes, and Verrucomicrobiota were significantly more abundant in the YG group than those in the WG group (p < 0.05). Venn analysis between WE and WG shows that Amaricoccus, Micrococcales, Flavobacteriaceae, and Paracoccus were the dominant bacteria genera, while Acinetobacter, Demequina, and Rheinheimera were the dominant bacteria genera between YE and YG. Pathways such as the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, microbial metabolism in different environments, and carbon metabolism were significantly more upregulated in WG than those in YG (p < 0.05). In addition, pathways such as sulfate, chloroplast, phototrophy, and the nitrogen metabolism were significantly different between the WE and YE samples. These findings suggest that the greenhouse mode, a typical heterotrophic bacterial model, contains bacterial flora consisting of Amaricoccus, Micrococcales, Flavobacteriaceae, and other bacteria, which is indicative of the biological sludge process. Conversely, the aquaponic mode, an autotrophic bacterial model, was characterized by Acinetobacter, Demequina, Rheinheimera, and other bacteria, signifying the autotrophic biological process. This research provides an extensive understanding of heterotrophic and autotrophic bacterial aquaculture systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9965531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99655312023-02-26 Intestinal Microbiota Differences in Litopenaeus vannamei Shrimp between Greenhouse and Aquaponic Rearing Dou, Yabin Wen, Mengying Shen, Hui Zhang, Sheng Jiang, Ge Qiao, Yi Cheng, Jie Cao, Xiaohui Wan, Xihe Sun, Xiaoman Life (Basel) Article The sustainability of shrimp aquaculture can be achieved through the development of greenhouse and aquaponic rearing modes, which are classified as heterotrophic and autotrophic bacterial aquaculture systems. However, there have been few investigations into the discrepancies between the intestinal and water microbiota of these two rearing methods. In this study, we collected shrimp samples from greenhouse-rearing (WG) and aquaponic-rearing (YG) ponds, and water samples (WE, YE), and investigated the intestinal and water microbiota between the two rearing modes. The results, through alpha and beta diversity analyses, reveal that there was basically no significant difference between shrimp intestine WG and YG (p > 0.05) or between rearing water WE and YE (p > 0.05). At the phylum and genus levels, the common bacteria between WE and WG differed significantly from those of YE and YG. The analysis of the top six phyla shows that Proteobacteria and Patescibacteria were significantly more abundant in the WG group than those in the YG group (p < 0.05). Conversely, Actinobacteriota, Firmicutes, and Verrucomicrobiota were significantly more abundant in the YG group than those in the WG group (p < 0.05). Venn analysis between WE and WG shows that Amaricoccus, Micrococcales, Flavobacteriaceae, and Paracoccus were the dominant bacteria genera, while Acinetobacter, Demequina, and Rheinheimera were the dominant bacteria genera between YE and YG. Pathways such as the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, microbial metabolism in different environments, and carbon metabolism were significantly more upregulated in WG than those in YG (p < 0.05). In addition, pathways such as sulfate, chloroplast, phototrophy, and the nitrogen metabolism were significantly different between the WE and YE samples. These findings suggest that the greenhouse mode, a typical heterotrophic bacterial model, contains bacterial flora consisting of Amaricoccus, Micrococcales, Flavobacteriaceae, and other bacteria, which is indicative of the biological sludge process. Conversely, the aquaponic mode, an autotrophic bacterial model, was characterized by Acinetobacter, Demequina, Rheinheimera, and other bacteria, signifying the autotrophic biological process. This research provides an extensive understanding of heterotrophic and autotrophic bacterial aquaculture systems. MDPI 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9965531/ /pubmed/36836882 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020525 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dou, Yabin
Wen, Mengying
Shen, Hui
Zhang, Sheng
Jiang, Ge
Qiao, Yi
Cheng, Jie
Cao, Xiaohui
Wan, Xihe
Sun, Xiaoman
Intestinal Microbiota Differences in Litopenaeus vannamei Shrimp between Greenhouse and Aquaponic Rearing
title Intestinal Microbiota Differences in Litopenaeus vannamei Shrimp between Greenhouse and Aquaponic Rearing
title_full Intestinal Microbiota Differences in Litopenaeus vannamei Shrimp between Greenhouse and Aquaponic Rearing
title_fullStr Intestinal Microbiota Differences in Litopenaeus vannamei Shrimp between Greenhouse and Aquaponic Rearing
title_full_unstemmed Intestinal Microbiota Differences in Litopenaeus vannamei Shrimp between Greenhouse and Aquaponic Rearing
title_short Intestinal Microbiota Differences in Litopenaeus vannamei Shrimp between Greenhouse and Aquaponic Rearing
title_sort intestinal microbiota differences in litopenaeus vannamei shrimp between greenhouse and aquaponic rearing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13020525
work_keys_str_mv AT douyabin intestinalmicrobiotadifferencesinlitopenaeusvannameishrimpbetweengreenhouseandaquaponicrearing
AT wenmengying intestinalmicrobiotadifferencesinlitopenaeusvannameishrimpbetweengreenhouseandaquaponicrearing
AT shenhui intestinalmicrobiotadifferencesinlitopenaeusvannameishrimpbetweengreenhouseandaquaponicrearing
AT zhangsheng intestinalmicrobiotadifferencesinlitopenaeusvannameishrimpbetweengreenhouseandaquaponicrearing
AT jiangge intestinalmicrobiotadifferencesinlitopenaeusvannameishrimpbetweengreenhouseandaquaponicrearing
AT qiaoyi intestinalmicrobiotadifferencesinlitopenaeusvannameishrimpbetweengreenhouseandaquaponicrearing
AT chengjie intestinalmicrobiotadifferencesinlitopenaeusvannameishrimpbetweengreenhouseandaquaponicrearing
AT caoxiaohui intestinalmicrobiotadifferencesinlitopenaeusvannameishrimpbetweengreenhouseandaquaponicrearing
AT wanxihe intestinalmicrobiotadifferencesinlitopenaeusvannameishrimpbetweengreenhouseandaquaponicrearing
AT sunxiaoman intestinalmicrobiotadifferencesinlitopenaeusvannameishrimpbetweengreenhouseandaquaponicrearing