Cargando…

Patient Satisfaction and Impact on Oral Health after Maxillary Rehabilitation Using a Personalized Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant (AMSJI)

Subperiosteal implants (SIs) were first developed by Dahl in 1941 for oral rehabilitation in case of severe jaw atrophy. Over time, this technique was abandoned due to the high success rate of endosseous implants. The emergence of patient-specific implants and modern dentistry allowed a revisitation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van den Borre, Casper, De Neef, Björn, Loomans, Natalie A. J., Rinaldi, Marco, Nout, Erik, Bouvry, Peter, Naert, Ignace, Mommaerts, Maurice Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836531
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020297
_version_ 1784896801681178624
author Van den Borre, Casper
De Neef, Björn
Loomans, Natalie A. J.
Rinaldi, Marco
Nout, Erik
Bouvry, Peter
Naert, Ignace
Mommaerts, Maurice Y.
author_facet Van den Borre, Casper
De Neef, Björn
Loomans, Natalie A. J.
Rinaldi, Marco
Nout, Erik
Bouvry, Peter
Naert, Ignace
Mommaerts, Maurice Y.
author_sort Van den Borre, Casper
collection PubMed
description Subperiosteal implants (SIs) were first developed by Dahl in 1941 for oral rehabilitation in case of severe jaw atrophy. Over time, this technique was abandoned due to the high success rate of endosseous implants. The emergence of patient-specific implants and modern dentistry allowed a revisitation of this 80-year-old concept resulting in a novel “high-tech” SI implant. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes in forty patients after maxillary rehabilitation with an additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI(®)). The oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14) and numerical rating (NRS) scale were used to assess patient satisfaction and evaluate oral health. In total, fifteen men (mean age: 64.62 years, SD ± 6.75 years) and twenty-five women (mean age: 65.24 years, SD ± 6.77 years) were included, with a mean follow-up time of 917 days (SD ± 306.89 days) after AMSJI installation. Patients reported a mean OHIP-14 of 4.20 (SD ± 7.10) and a mean overall satisfaction based on the NRS of 52.25 (SD ± 4.00). Prosthetic rehabilitation was achieved in all patients. AMSJI is a valuable treatment option for patients with extreme jaw atrophy. Patients enjoy treatment benefits resulting in high patient satisfaction rates and impact on oral health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9965586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99655862023-02-26 Patient Satisfaction and Impact on Oral Health after Maxillary Rehabilitation Using a Personalized Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant (AMSJI) Van den Borre, Casper De Neef, Björn Loomans, Natalie A. J. Rinaldi, Marco Nout, Erik Bouvry, Peter Naert, Ignace Mommaerts, Maurice Y. J Pers Med Article Subperiosteal implants (SIs) were first developed by Dahl in 1941 for oral rehabilitation in case of severe jaw atrophy. Over time, this technique was abandoned due to the high success rate of endosseous implants. The emergence of patient-specific implants and modern dentistry allowed a revisitation of this 80-year-old concept resulting in a novel “high-tech” SI implant. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes in forty patients after maxillary rehabilitation with an additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI(®)). The oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14) and numerical rating (NRS) scale were used to assess patient satisfaction and evaluate oral health. In total, fifteen men (mean age: 64.62 years, SD ± 6.75 years) and twenty-five women (mean age: 65.24 years, SD ± 6.77 years) were included, with a mean follow-up time of 917 days (SD ± 306.89 days) after AMSJI installation. Patients reported a mean OHIP-14 of 4.20 (SD ± 7.10) and a mean overall satisfaction based on the NRS of 52.25 (SD ± 4.00). Prosthetic rehabilitation was achieved in all patients. AMSJI is a valuable treatment option for patients with extreme jaw atrophy. Patients enjoy treatment benefits resulting in high patient satisfaction rates and impact on oral health. MDPI 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9965586/ /pubmed/36836531 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020297 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Van den Borre, Casper
De Neef, Björn
Loomans, Natalie A. J.
Rinaldi, Marco
Nout, Erik
Bouvry, Peter
Naert, Ignace
Mommaerts, Maurice Y.
Patient Satisfaction and Impact on Oral Health after Maxillary Rehabilitation Using a Personalized Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant (AMSJI)
title Patient Satisfaction and Impact on Oral Health after Maxillary Rehabilitation Using a Personalized Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant (AMSJI)
title_full Patient Satisfaction and Impact on Oral Health after Maxillary Rehabilitation Using a Personalized Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant (AMSJI)
title_fullStr Patient Satisfaction and Impact on Oral Health after Maxillary Rehabilitation Using a Personalized Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant (AMSJI)
title_full_unstemmed Patient Satisfaction and Impact on Oral Health after Maxillary Rehabilitation Using a Personalized Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant (AMSJI)
title_short Patient Satisfaction and Impact on Oral Health after Maxillary Rehabilitation Using a Personalized Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant (AMSJI)
title_sort patient satisfaction and impact on oral health after maxillary rehabilitation using a personalized additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (amsji)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836531
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020297
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenborrecasper patientsatisfactionandimpactonoralhealthaftermaxillaryrehabilitationusingapersonalizedadditivelymanufacturedsubperiostealjawimplantamsji
AT deneefbjorn patientsatisfactionandimpactonoralhealthaftermaxillaryrehabilitationusingapersonalizedadditivelymanufacturedsubperiostealjawimplantamsji
AT loomansnatalieaj patientsatisfactionandimpactonoralhealthaftermaxillaryrehabilitationusingapersonalizedadditivelymanufacturedsubperiostealjawimplantamsji
AT rinaldimarco patientsatisfactionandimpactonoralhealthaftermaxillaryrehabilitationusingapersonalizedadditivelymanufacturedsubperiostealjawimplantamsji
AT nouterik patientsatisfactionandimpactonoralhealthaftermaxillaryrehabilitationusingapersonalizedadditivelymanufacturedsubperiostealjawimplantamsji
AT bouvrypeter patientsatisfactionandimpactonoralhealthaftermaxillaryrehabilitationusingapersonalizedadditivelymanufacturedsubperiostealjawimplantamsji
AT naertignace patientsatisfactionandimpactonoralhealthaftermaxillaryrehabilitationusingapersonalizedadditivelymanufacturedsubperiostealjawimplantamsji
AT mommaertsmauricey patientsatisfactionandimpactonoralhealthaftermaxillaryrehabilitationusingapersonalizedadditivelymanufacturedsubperiostealjawimplantamsji