Cargando…
Mechanical versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Middle-Aged Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Mechanical prostheses and bioprosthetic prostheses have their own advantages and disadvantages. Mechanical ones are recommended for younger patients (<50 years old), and bioprosthetic ones are recommended for older patients (>70 years old). There is still debate regarding which kin...
Autores principales: | Jiang, Yefan, Wang, Song, Bian, Jinhui, Chen, Si, Shao, Yongfeng |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826586 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10020090 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Ross Procedure Versus Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Network Meta‐Analysis
por: Yokoyama, Yujiro, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 70 Years: Mechanical or Bioprosthetic Valve? A Systematic Review
por: Sigala, Evangelia, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Valve-in-valve/valve-in-ring transcatheter mitral valve implantation vs. redo surgical mitral valve replacement for patients with failed bioprosthetic valves or annuloplasty rings: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Xu, Xiufan, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Transcatheter Double Valve-in-Valve Replacement of Aortic and Mitral Bioprosthetic Valves
por: Savoj, Javad, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Bioprosthetic versus mechanical tricuspid valve replacement: Biological age is not the same as chronological age
por: Van den Eynde, Jef, et al.
Publicado: (2023)