Cargando…

High-Density Microarray Analysis of Microbial Community Structures in Membrane Bioreactor at Short Sludge Retention Time

Membrane bioreactors (MBR) have become prevalent in wastewater treatment because of their high effluent quality and low sludge generation. Sludge retention time (SRT) is an important parameter in the operation of MBR, and it has a direct effect on the microbial community. In this study, microarrays...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Shilong, Duan, Liang, Song, Yonghui, Hermanowicz, Slawomir W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020146
_version_ 1784896905843572736
author Li, Shilong
Duan, Liang
Song, Yonghui
Hermanowicz, Slawomir W.
author_facet Li, Shilong
Duan, Liang
Song, Yonghui
Hermanowicz, Slawomir W.
author_sort Li, Shilong
collection PubMed
description Membrane bioreactors (MBR) have become prevalent in wastewater treatment because of their high effluent quality and low sludge generation. Sludge retention time (SRT) is an important parameter in the operation of MBR, and it has a direct effect on the microbial community. In this study, microarrays were used to analyze the microbial communities of three different MBRs at short SRTs. The results showed that MBR at SRT 5 days (CS5) has the highest operational taxonomic units (OTUs) richness, but the lowest diversity and uniformity compared to SRT 3 days at continuous CS3 and the sequencing batch (SS3). Proteobacteria were the dominant phylum of three reactors. Bacteroidetes were the second dominant phylum in MBRs at the continuous model, instead of Actinobacteria at the sequencing model. At the class level, the dominant group of Proteobacteria exhibited a remarkable difference between the three MBRs. γ-Proteobacteria was the dominant group in CS5 and CS3, while α-Proteobacteria was the main group in SS3. The samples from the three MBRs had similar compositions of α-, β- and δ-Proteobacteria. However, γ-Proteobacteria showed different community compositions at the order level between the three MBRs. Enterobacteriales were the dominant group in CS5 and CS3, while Pseudomonadales were the dominant group in SS3. The bacterial community concentration of SRT 5 days was generally higher than that of the other two MBRs. The community composition of CS5 was significantly different from that of CS3 and SS3, and the phylogenetic relationships of the three MBRs were relatively different.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9965995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99659952023-02-26 High-Density Microarray Analysis of Microbial Community Structures in Membrane Bioreactor at Short Sludge Retention Time Li, Shilong Duan, Liang Song, Yonghui Hermanowicz, Slawomir W. Membranes (Basel) Article Membrane bioreactors (MBR) have become prevalent in wastewater treatment because of their high effluent quality and low sludge generation. Sludge retention time (SRT) is an important parameter in the operation of MBR, and it has a direct effect on the microbial community. In this study, microarrays were used to analyze the microbial communities of three different MBRs at short SRTs. The results showed that MBR at SRT 5 days (CS5) has the highest operational taxonomic units (OTUs) richness, but the lowest diversity and uniformity compared to SRT 3 days at continuous CS3 and the sequencing batch (SS3). Proteobacteria were the dominant phylum of three reactors. Bacteroidetes were the second dominant phylum in MBRs at the continuous model, instead of Actinobacteria at the sequencing model. At the class level, the dominant group of Proteobacteria exhibited a remarkable difference between the three MBRs. γ-Proteobacteria was the dominant group in CS5 and CS3, while α-Proteobacteria was the main group in SS3. The samples from the three MBRs had similar compositions of α-, β- and δ-Proteobacteria. However, γ-Proteobacteria showed different community compositions at the order level between the three MBRs. Enterobacteriales were the dominant group in CS5 and CS3, while Pseudomonadales were the dominant group in SS3. The bacterial community concentration of SRT 5 days was generally higher than that of the other two MBRs. The community composition of CS5 was significantly different from that of CS3 and SS3, and the phylogenetic relationships of the three MBRs were relatively different. MDPI 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9965995/ /pubmed/36837649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020146 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Shilong
Duan, Liang
Song, Yonghui
Hermanowicz, Slawomir W.
High-Density Microarray Analysis of Microbial Community Structures in Membrane Bioreactor at Short Sludge Retention Time
title High-Density Microarray Analysis of Microbial Community Structures in Membrane Bioreactor at Short Sludge Retention Time
title_full High-Density Microarray Analysis of Microbial Community Structures in Membrane Bioreactor at Short Sludge Retention Time
title_fullStr High-Density Microarray Analysis of Microbial Community Structures in Membrane Bioreactor at Short Sludge Retention Time
title_full_unstemmed High-Density Microarray Analysis of Microbial Community Structures in Membrane Bioreactor at Short Sludge Retention Time
title_short High-Density Microarray Analysis of Microbial Community Structures in Membrane Bioreactor at Short Sludge Retention Time
title_sort high-density microarray analysis of microbial community structures in membrane bioreactor at short sludge retention time
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020146
work_keys_str_mv AT lishilong highdensitymicroarrayanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructuresinmembranebioreactoratshortsludgeretentiontime
AT duanliang highdensitymicroarrayanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructuresinmembranebioreactoratshortsludgeretentiontime
AT songyonghui highdensitymicroarrayanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructuresinmembranebioreactoratshortsludgeretentiontime
AT hermanowiczslawomirw highdensitymicroarrayanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructuresinmembranebioreactoratshortsludgeretentiontime