Cargando…

Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial

Background and Objectives: Difficult intubation, which may be encountered unexpectedly during anesthesia, can increase patients’ morbidity and mortality. The McGRATH video laryngoscope is known to provide improved laryngeal visibility in patients with difficult or normal airways. The purpose of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jong-Yeop, Park, Seonghyeok, Oh, Minho, Choi, Jong-Bun, John, Hyun-Ji, Lee, Soo-Kyung, Choi, Yi-Hwa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020282
_version_ 1784896966053855232
author Kim, Jong-Yeop
Park, Seonghyeok
Oh, Minho
Choi, Jong-Bun
John, Hyun-Ji
Lee, Soo-Kyung
Choi, Yi-Hwa
author_facet Kim, Jong-Yeop
Park, Seonghyeok
Oh, Minho
Choi, Jong-Bun
John, Hyun-Ji
Lee, Soo-Kyung
Choi, Yi-Hwa
author_sort Kim, Jong-Yeop
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Difficult intubation, which may be encountered unexpectedly during anesthesia, can increase patients’ morbidity and mortality. The McGRATH video laryngoscope is known to provide improved laryngeal visibility in patients with difficult or normal airways. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the McGRATH video laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation compared with that of conventional Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airway scenarios. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were assigned to the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 50) or McGRATH video laryngoscope (n = 45) groups. In this study, to create a simulated difficult airway condition, the subjects performed manual in-line stabilization and applied a soft cervical collar. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation within 30 s. The time required for an intubation, glottis grade, intubation difficulty scale (IDS score), the subjective ease of intubation, and optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OLEM) were evaluated. In addition, complications caused by each blade were investigated. Results: The intubation success rate within 30 s was not significantly different between the two groups (44 (88.0%) vs. 36 (80.0%), p = 0.286). The glottic grade was better in the McGRATH group than in the Macintosh group (p = 0.029), but neither the intubation time (26.3 ± 8.2 s vs. 24.2 ± 5.0 s, p = 0.134) nor the rates of oral bleeding (2 (4.0%) vs. 0 (0.0%)) and tooth injury (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (2.2%)) were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The use of the McGRATH video laryngoscope did not improve the intubation success rate or shorten the intubation time. However, the McGRATH video laryngoscope provided a better glottis view than the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9966235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99662352023-02-26 Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial Kim, Jong-Yeop Park, Seonghyeok Oh, Minho Choi, Jong-Bun John, Hyun-Ji Lee, Soo-Kyung Choi, Yi-Hwa Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Difficult intubation, which may be encountered unexpectedly during anesthesia, can increase patients’ morbidity and mortality. The McGRATH video laryngoscope is known to provide improved laryngeal visibility in patients with difficult or normal airways. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the McGRATH video laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation compared with that of conventional Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airway scenarios. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were assigned to the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 50) or McGRATH video laryngoscope (n = 45) groups. In this study, to create a simulated difficult airway condition, the subjects performed manual in-line stabilization and applied a soft cervical collar. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation within 30 s. The time required for an intubation, glottis grade, intubation difficulty scale (IDS score), the subjective ease of intubation, and optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OLEM) were evaluated. In addition, complications caused by each blade were investigated. Results: The intubation success rate within 30 s was not significantly different between the two groups (44 (88.0%) vs. 36 (80.0%), p = 0.286). The glottic grade was better in the McGRATH group than in the Macintosh group (p = 0.029), but neither the intubation time (26.3 ± 8.2 s vs. 24.2 ± 5.0 s, p = 0.134) nor the rates of oral bleeding (2 (4.0%) vs. 0 (0.0%)) and tooth injury (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (2.2%)) were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The use of the McGRATH video laryngoscope did not improve the intubation success rate or shorten the intubation time. However, the McGRATH video laryngoscope provided a better glottis view than the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway. MDPI 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9966235/ /pubmed/36837484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020282 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Jong-Yeop
Park, Seonghyeok
Oh, Minho
Choi, Jong-Bun
John, Hyun-Ji
Lee, Soo-Kyung
Choi, Yi-Hwa
Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial
title Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison of the mcgrath(tm) video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway scenario: an open-label, randomized clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020282
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjongyeop comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT parkseonghyeok comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ohminho comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT choijongbun comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT johnhyunji comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT leesookyung comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT choiyihwa comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial