Cargando…
Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial
Background and Objectives: Difficult intubation, which may be encountered unexpectedly during anesthesia, can increase patients’ morbidity and mortality. The McGRATH video laryngoscope is known to provide improved laryngeal visibility in patients with difficult or normal airways. The purpose of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020282 |
_version_ | 1784896966053855232 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jong-Yeop Park, Seonghyeok Oh, Minho Choi, Jong-Bun John, Hyun-Ji Lee, Soo-Kyung Choi, Yi-Hwa |
author_facet | Kim, Jong-Yeop Park, Seonghyeok Oh, Minho Choi, Jong-Bun John, Hyun-Ji Lee, Soo-Kyung Choi, Yi-Hwa |
author_sort | Kim, Jong-Yeop |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: Difficult intubation, which may be encountered unexpectedly during anesthesia, can increase patients’ morbidity and mortality. The McGRATH video laryngoscope is known to provide improved laryngeal visibility in patients with difficult or normal airways. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the McGRATH video laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation compared with that of conventional Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airway scenarios. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were assigned to the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 50) or McGRATH video laryngoscope (n = 45) groups. In this study, to create a simulated difficult airway condition, the subjects performed manual in-line stabilization and applied a soft cervical collar. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation within 30 s. The time required for an intubation, glottis grade, intubation difficulty scale (IDS score), the subjective ease of intubation, and optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OLEM) were evaluated. In addition, complications caused by each blade were investigated. Results: The intubation success rate within 30 s was not significantly different between the two groups (44 (88.0%) vs. 36 (80.0%), p = 0.286). The glottic grade was better in the McGRATH group than in the Macintosh group (p = 0.029), but neither the intubation time (26.3 ± 8.2 s vs. 24.2 ± 5.0 s, p = 0.134) nor the rates of oral bleeding (2 (4.0%) vs. 0 (0.0%)) and tooth injury (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (2.2%)) were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The use of the McGRATH video laryngoscope did not improve the intubation success rate or shorten the intubation time. However, the McGRATH video laryngoscope provided a better glottis view than the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9966235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99662352023-02-26 Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial Kim, Jong-Yeop Park, Seonghyeok Oh, Minho Choi, Jong-Bun John, Hyun-Ji Lee, Soo-Kyung Choi, Yi-Hwa Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Difficult intubation, which may be encountered unexpectedly during anesthesia, can increase patients’ morbidity and mortality. The McGRATH video laryngoscope is known to provide improved laryngeal visibility in patients with difficult or normal airways. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the McGRATH video laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation compared with that of conventional Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airway scenarios. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were assigned to the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 50) or McGRATH video laryngoscope (n = 45) groups. In this study, to create a simulated difficult airway condition, the subjects performed manual in-line stabilization and applied a soft cervical collar. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation within 30 s. The time required for an intubation, glottis grade, intubation difficulty scale (IDS score), the subjective ease of intubation, and optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OLEM) were evaluated. In addition, complications caused by each blade were investigated. Results: The intubation success rate within 30 s was not significantly different between the two groups (44 (88.0%) vs. 36 (80.0%), p = 0.286). The glottic grade was better in the McGRATH group than in the Macintosh group (p = 0.029), but neither the intubation time (26.3 ± 8.2 s vs. 24.2 ± 5.0 s, p = 0.134) nor the rates of oral bleeding (2 (4.0%) vs. 0 (0.0%)) and tooth injury (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (2.2%)) were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The use of the McGRATH video laryngoscope did not improve the intubation success rate or shorten the intubation time. However, the McGRATH video laryngoscope provided a better glottis view than the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway. MDPI 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9966235/ /pubmed/36837484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020282 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Jong-Yeop Park, Seonghyeok Oh, Minho Choi, Jong-Bun John, Hyun-Ji Lee, Soo-Kyung Choi, Yi-Hwa Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Comparison of the McGRATH(TM) Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | comparison of the mcgrath(tm) video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway scenario: an open-label, randomized clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjongyeop comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial AT parkseonghyeok comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial AT ohminho comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial AT choijongbun comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial AT johnhyunji comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial AT leesookyung comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial AT choiyihwa comparisonofthemcgrathtmvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopefororotrachealintubationinasimulateddifficultairwayscenarioanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial |