Cargando…
Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications
Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide. Surgery is the most common treatment for RC, performed in 63.2% of patients. The type of surgical approach chosen aims to achieve maximum residual function with the lowest risk of recurrence. The selection is made by a multidisciplin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041489 |
_version_ | 1784897025202978816 |
---|---|
author | De Muzio, Federica Fusco, Roberta Cutolo, Carmen Giacobbe, Giuliana Bruno, Federico Palumbo, Pierpaolo Danti, Ginevra Grazzini, Giulia Flammia, Federica Borgheresi, Alessandra Agostini, Andrea Grassi, Francesca Giovagnoni, Andrea Miele, Vittorio Barile, Antonio Granata, Vincenza |
author_facet | De Muzio, Federica Fusco, Roberta Cutolo, Carmen Giacobbe, Giuliana Bruno, Federico Palumbo, Pierpaolo Danti, Ginevra Grazzini, Giulia Flammia, Federica Borgheresi, Alessandra Agostini, Andrea Grassi, Francesca Giovagnoni, Andrea Miele, Vittorio Barile, Antonio Granata, Vincenza |
author_sort | De Muzio, Federica |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide. Surgery is the most common treatment for RC, performed in 63.2% of patients. The type of surgical approach chosen aims to achieve maximum residual function with the lowest risk of recurrence. The selection is made by a multidisciplinary team that assesses the characteristics of the patient and the tumor. Total mesorectal excision (TME), including both low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR), is still the standard of care for RC. Radical surgery is burdened by a 31% rate of major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade 3–4), such as anastomotic leaks and a risk of a permanent stoma. In recent years, less-invasive techniques, such as local excision, have been tested. These additional procedures could mitigate the morbidity of rectal resection, while providing acceptable oncologic results. The “watch and wait” approach is not a globally accepted model of care but encouraging results on selected groups of patients make it a promising strategy. In this plethora of treatments, the radiologist is called upon to distinguish a physiological from a pathological postoperative finding. The aim of this narrative review is to identify the main post-surgical complications and the most effective imaging techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9966470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99664702023-02-26 Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications De Muzio, Federica Fusco, Roberta Cutolo, Carmen Giacobbe, Giuliana Bruno, Federico Palumbo, Pierpaolo Danti, Ginevra Grazzini, Giulia Flammia, Federica Borgheresi, Alessandra Agostini, Andrea Grassi, Francesca Giovagnoni, Andrea Miele, Vittorio Barile, Antonio Granata, Vincenza J Clin Med Review Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide. Surgery is the most common treatment for RC, performed in 63.2% of patients. The type of surgical approach chosen aims to achieve maximum residual function with the lowest risk of recurrence. The selection is made by a multidisciplinary team that assesses the characteristics of the patient and the tumor. Total mesorectal excision (TME), including both low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR), is still the standard of care for RC. Radical surgery is burdened by a 31% rate of major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade 3–4), such as anastomotic leaks and a risk of a permanent stoma. In recent years, less-invasive techniques, such as local excision, have been tested. These additional procedures could mitigate the morbidity of rectal resection, while providing acceptable oncologic results. The “watch and wait” approach is not a globally accepted model of care but encouraging results on selected groups of patients make it a promising strategy. In this plethora of treatments, the radiologist is called upon to distinguish a physiological from a pathological postoperative finding. The aim of this narrative review is to identify the main post-surgical complications and the most effective imaging techniques. MDPI 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9966470/ /pubmed/36836024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041489 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review De Muzio, Federica Fusco, Roberta Cutolo, Carmen Giacobbe, Giuliana Bruno, Federico Palumbo, Pierpaolo Danti, Ginevra Grazzini, Giulia Flammia, Federica Borgheresi, Alessandra Agostini, Andrea Grassi, Francesca Giovagnoni, Andrea Miele, Vittorio Barile, Antonio Granata, Vincenza Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications |
title | Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications |
title_full | Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications |
title_fullStr | Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications |
title_short | Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications |
title_sort | post-surgical imaging assessment in rectal cancer: normal findings and complications |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demuziofederica postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT fuscoroberta postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT cutolocarmen postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT giacobbegiuliana postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT brunofederico postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT palumbopierpaolo postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT dantiginevra postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT grazzinigiulia postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT flammiafederica postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT borgheresialessandra postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT agostiniandrea postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT grassifrancesca postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT giovagnoniandrea postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT mielevittorio postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT barileantonio postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications AT granatavincenza postsurgicalimagingassessmentinrectalcancernormalfindingsandcomplications |