Cargando…
Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading
This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of pupil size measurements over time and between reading methods when comparing human-assisted reading to automated reading. Pupillary data were analyzed on a subset of myopic children enrolled in a multicenter randomized clinical trial on myopia c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020273 |
_version_ | 1784897042422693888 |
---|---|
author | Hvid-Hansen, Anders Bækgaard, Per Jacobsen, Nina Hjortdal, Jesper Møller, Flemming Kessel, Line |
author_facet | Hvid-Hansen, Anders Bækgaard, Per Jacobsen, Nina Hjortdal, Jesper Møller, Flemming Kessel, Line |
author_sort | Hvid-Hansen, Anders |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of pupil size measurements over time and between reading methods when comparing human-assisted reading to automated reading. Pupillary data were analyzed on a subset of myopic children enrolled in a multicenter randomized clinical trial on myopia control with low-dose atropine. Pupil size measurements were obtained prior to randomization at two time points (screening and baseline visits) using a dedicated pupillometer under mesopic and photopic conditions. A customized algorithm was built to perform automated readings, allowing comparisons between human-assisted and automated readings. Reproducibility analyses followed the principles of Bland and Altman and included the calculation of the mean difference between measurements and limits of agreement (LOA). We included 43 children. Mean (standard deviation) age was 9.8 (1.7) years and 25 (58%) children were girls. Using human-assisted readings, reproducibility over time showed mesopic mean difference of 0.02 mm with LOA from −0.87 mm to 0.91 mm, whereas photopic mean difference was −0.01 mm with LOA from −0.25 mm to 0.23 mm. Reproducibility between human-assisted and automated readings was also higher under photopic conditions, with mean difference of 0.03 mm and LOA from −0.03 mm to 0.10 mm at screening and mean difference of 0.03 mm and LOA from −0.06 mm to 0.12 mm at baseline. Using a dedicated pupillometer, we found that examinations performed under photopic conditions demonstrated higher reproducibility over time and between reading methods. We speculate whether mesopic measurements are sufficiently reproducible to be monitored over time. Furthermore, photopic measurements may be of greater relevance when evaluating the side effects of atropine treatment, such as photophobia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9966540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99665402023-02-26 Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading Hvid-Hansen, Anders Bækgaard, Per Jacobsen, Nina Hjortdal, Jesper Møller, Flemming Kessel, Line J Pers Med Article This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of pupil size measurements over time and between reading methods when comparing human-assisted reading to automated reading. Pupillary data were analyzed on a subset of myopic children enrolled in a multicenter randomized clinical trial on myopia control with low-dose atropine. Pupil size measurements were obtained prior to randomization at two time points (screening and baseline visits) using a dedicated pupillometer under mesopic and photopic conditions. A customized algorithm was built to perform automated readings, allowing comparisons between human-assisted and automated readings. Reproducibility analyses followed the principles of Bland and Altman and included the calculation of the mean difference between measurements and limits of agreement (LOA). We included 43 children. Mean (standard deviation) age was 9.8 (1.7) years and 25 (58%) children were girls. Using human-assisted readings, reproducibility over time showed mesopic mean difference of 0.02 mm with LOA from −0.87 mm to 0.91 mm, whereas photopic mean difference was −0.01 mm with LOA from −0.25 mm to 0.23 mm. Reproducibility between human-assisted and automated readings was also higher under photopic conditions, with mean difference of 0.03 mm and LOA from −0.03 mm to 0.10 mm at screening and mean difference of 0.03 mm and LOA from −0.06 mm to 0.12 mm at baseline. Using a dedicated pupillometer, we found that examinations performed under photopic conditions demonstrated higher reproducibility over time and between reading methods. We speculate whether mesopic measurements are sufficiently reproducible to be monitored over time. Furthermore, photopic measurements may be of greater relevance when evaluating the side effects of atropine treatment, such as photophobia. MDPI 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9966540/ /pubmed/36836507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020273 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hvid-Hansen, Anders Bækgaard, Per Jacobsen, Nina Hjortdal, Jesper Møller, Flemming Kessel, Line Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading |
title | Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading |
title_full | Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading |
title_short | Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading |
title_sort | reproducibility of mesopic and photopic pupil sizes in myopic children using a dedicated pupillometer with human-assisted or automated reading |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hvidhansenanders reproducibilityofmesopicandphotopicpupilsizesinmyopicchildrenusingadedicatedpupillometerwithhumanassistedorautomatedreading AT bækgaardper reproducibilityofmesopicandphotopicpupilsizesinmyopicchildrenusingadedicatedpupillometerwithhumanassistedorautomatedreading AT jacobsennina reproducibilityofmesopicandphotopicpupilsizesinmyopicchildrenusingadedicatedpupillometerwithhumanassistedorautomatedreading AT hjortdaljesper reproducibilityofmesopicandphotopicpupilsizesinmyopicchildrenusingadedicatedpupillometerwithhumanassistedorautomatedreading AT møllerflemming reproducibilityofmesopicandphotopicpupilsizesinmyopicchildrenusingadedicatedpupillometerwithhumanassistedorautomatedreading AT kesselline reproducibilityofmesopicandphotopicpupilsizesinmyopicchildrenusingadedicatedpupillometerwithhumanassistedorautomatedreading |