Cargando…

Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD)

Background: An unintended consequence following lumbar fusion is the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior decompression (OLIF-PD) is another feasible option for ASD, and there is no literature report on this combined surgical strategy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Bin, Hu, Yuan, Kong, Qingquan, Feng, Pin, Liu, Junlin, Ma, Junsong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836602
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020368
_version_ 1784897071681110016
author Zhang, Bin
Hu, Yuan
Kong, Qingquan
Feng, Pin
Liu, Junlin
Ma, Junsong
author_facet Zhang, Bin
Hu, Yuan
Kong, Qingquan
Feng, Pin
Liu, Junlin
Ma, Junsong
author_sort Zhang, Bin
collection PubMed
description Background: An unintended consequence following lumbar fusion is the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior decompression (OLIF-PD) is another feasible option for ASD, and there is no literature report on this combined surgical strategy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 18 ASD patients requiring direct decompression in our hospital between September 2017 and January 2022. Among them, eight patients underwent OLIF-PD revision and ten underwent PLIF revision. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups. The clinical outcomes and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time, operative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay in the OLIF-PD group were significantly lower than those in the PLIF group. The VAS of low back pain in the OLIF-PD group was significantly better than that in the PLIF group during the postoperative follow-up. The ODI at the last follow-up in the OLIF-PD group and the PLIF group were significantly relieved compared with those before operation. The excellent and good rate of the modified MacNab standard at the last follow-up was 87.5% in the OLIF-PD group and 70% in the PLIF group. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups. Conclusion: For ASD requiring direct decompression after posterior lumbar fusion, compared with traditional PLIF revision surgery, OLIF-PD has a similar clinical effect, but has a reduced operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and complications. OLIF-PD may be an alternative revision strategy for ASD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9966658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99666582023-02-26 Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD) Zhang, Bin Hu, Yuan Kong, Qingquan Feng, Pin Liu, Junlin Ma, Junsong J Pers Med Article Background: An unintended consequence following lumbar fusion is the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior decompression (OLIF-PD) is another feasible option for ASD, and there is no literature report on this combined surgical strategy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 18 ASD patients requiring direct decompression in our hospital between September 2017 and January 2022. Among them, eight patients underwent OLIF-PD revision and ten underwent PLIF revision. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups. The clinical outcomes and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time, operative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay in the OLIF-PD group were significantly lower than those in the PLIF group. The VAS of low back pain in the OLIF-PD group was significantly better than that in the PLIF group during the postoperative follow-up. The ODI at the last follow-up in the OLIF-PD group and the PLIF group were significantly relieved compared with those before operation. The excellent and good rate of the modified MacNab standard at the last follow-up was 87.5% in the OLIF-PD group and 70% in the PLIF group. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups. Conclusion: For ASD requiring direct decompression after posterior lumbar fusion, compared with traditional PLIF revision surgery, OLIF-PD has a similar clinical effect, but has a reduced operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and complications. OLIF-PD may be an alternative revision strategy for ASD. MDPI 2023-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9966658/ /pubmed/36836602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020368 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Bin
Hu, Yuan
Kong, Qingquan
Feng, Pin
Liu, Junlin
Ma, Junsong
Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD)
title Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD)
title_full Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD)
title_fullStr Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD)
title_short Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD)
title_sort comparison of oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior decompression (olif-pd) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (plif) in the treatment of adjacent segmental disease(asd)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836602
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020368
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangbin comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd
AT huyuan comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd
AT kongqingquan comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd
AT fengpin comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd
AT liujunlin comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd
AT majunsong comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd