Cargando…
Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD)
Background: An unintended consequence following lumbar fusion is the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior decompression (OLIF-PD) is another feasible option for ASD, and there is no literature report on this combined surgical strategy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020368 |
_version_ | 1784897071681110016 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Bin Hu, Yuan Kong, Qingquan Feng, Pin Liu, Junlin Ma, Junsong |
author_facet | Zhang, Bin Hu, Yuan Kong, Qingquan Feng, Pin Liu, Junlin Ma, Junsong |
author_sort | Zhang, Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: An unintended consequence following lumbar fusion is the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior decompression (OLIF-PD) is another feasible option for ASD, and there is no literature report on this combined surgical strategy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 18 ASD patients requiring direct decompression in our hospital between September 2017 and January 2022. Among them, eight patients underwent OLIF-PD revision and ten underwent PLIF revision. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups. The clinical outcomes and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time, operative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay in the OLIF-PD group were significantly lower than those in the PLIF group. The VAS of low back pain in the OLIF-PD group was significantly better than that in the PLIF group during the postoperative follow-up. The ODI at the last follow-up in the OLIF-PD group and the PLIF group were significantly relieved compared with those before operation. The excellent and good rate of the modified MacNab standard at the last follow-up was 87.5% in the OLIF-PD group and 70% in the PLIF group. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups. Conclusion: For ASD requiring direct decompression after posterior lumbar fusion, compared with traditional PLIF revision surgery, OLIF-PD has a similar clinical effect, but has a reduced operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and complications. OLIF-PD may be an alternative revision strategy for ASD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9966658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99666582023-02-26 Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD) Zhang, Bin Hu, Yuan Kong, Qingquan Feng, Pin Liu, Junlin Ma, Junsong J Pers Med Article Background: An unintended consequence following lumbar fusion is the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior decompression (OLIF-PD) is another feasible option for ASD, and there is no literature report on this combined surgical strategy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 18 ASD patients requiring direct decompression in our hospital between September 2017 and January 2022. Among them, eight patients underwent OLIF-PD revision and ten underwent PLIF revision. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups. The clinical outcomes and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time, operative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay in the OLIF-PD group were significantly lower than those in the PLIF group. The VAS of low back pain in the OLIF-PD group was significantly better than that in the PLIF group during the postoperative follow-up. The ODI at the last follow-up in the OLIF-PD group and the PLIF group were significantly relieved compared with those before operation. The excellent and good rate of the modified MacNab standard at the last follow-up was 87.5% in the OLIF-PD group and 70% in the PLIF group. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups. Conclusion: For ASD requiring direct decompression after posterior lumbar fusion, compared with traditional PLIF revision surgery, OLIF-PD has a similar clinical effect, but has a reduced operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and complications. OLIF-PD may be an alternative revision strategy for ASD. MDPI 2023-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9966658/ /pubmed/36836602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020368 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Bin Hu, Yuan Kong, Qingquan Feng, Pin Liu, Junlin Ma, Junsong Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD) |
title | Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD) |
title_full | Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD) |
title_short | Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD) |
title_sort | comparison of oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior decompression (olif-pd) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (plif) in the treatment of adjacent segmental disease(asd) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36836602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020368 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangbin comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd AT huyuan comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd AT kongqingquan comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd AT fengpin comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd AT liujunlin comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd AT majunsong comparisonofobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithposteriordecompressionolifpdandposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionplifinthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentaldiseaseasd |