Cargando…

Modification of Cellulose Acetate Microfiltration Membranes Using Graphene Oxide–Polyethyleneimine for Enhanced Dye Rejection

Pressure-based membrane processes represent excellent water resource recovery prospects from industrial waste streams. In contrast with conventional pretreatment technologies, studies have shown that membrane pretreatment applications, such as microfiltration (MF), are more cost-effective and improv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ong, Maria Dominique, Vasquez, Isabel, Alvarez, Brandon, Cho, Dylan R., Williams, Malik B., Vincent, Donovan, Ali, Md. Arafat, Aich, Nirupam, Pinto, Alexandre H., Choudhury, Mahbuboor Rahman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020143
_version_ 1784897119058919424
author Ong, Maria Dominique
Vasquez, Isabel
Alvarez, Brandon
Cho, Dylan R.
Williams, Malik B.
Vincent, Donovan
Ali, Md. Arafat
Aich, Nirupam
Pinto, Alexandre H.
Choudhury, Mahbuboor Rahman
author_facet Ong, Maria Dominique
Vasquez, Isabel
Alvarez, Brandon
Cho, Dylan R.
Williams, Malik B.
Vincent, Donovan
Ali, Md. Arafat
Aich, Nirupam
Pinto, Alexandre H.
Choudhury, Mahbuboor Rahman
author_sort Ong, Maria Dominique
collection PubMed
description Pressure-based membrane processes represent excellent water resource recovery prospects from industrial waste streams. In contrast with conventional pretreatment technologies, studies have shown that membrane pretreatment applications, such as microfiltration (MF), are more cost-effective and improve the results of the overall treatment processes. Hence, enhancing rejection efficiency of MF will enhance the performance of any downstream treatment processes. In this study, 0.45 µm cellulose acetate (CA) microfiltration membranes were modified by vacuum filtration-assisted layer-by-layer deposition of bilayers composed of negatively charged graphene oxide (GO) and positively charged polyethyleneimine (PEI). The performance of 1-, 2-, and 4-bilayer GO–PEI-modified membranes were investigated for their dye-rejection of anionic eriochrome black T (EBT) dye and cationic methylene blue (MB) dye in a cross-flow membrane module. As the number of bilayers on the membrane increased, the membrane thicknesses increased, and the deionized (DI) water flux through the membranes decreased from 4877 LMH/bar for the control (no bilayer) membrane to 2890 LMH/bar for the 4-bilayer membrane. Conversely, the dye-rejection performance of the modified membranes increased as increasing bilayers of GO–PEI deposited on the membranes. The anionic EBT dye saw superior rejection (~90% rejection) compared to the cationic MB dye (~80% rejection), which can be attributable to the electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged GO surface and anionic EBT dye. After 50% recovery of the saline and dye-laden feed water, there was an observed drop in DI water fluxes of ~40–41% and 36%, respectively. There was also a slight increase in EBT dye-rejection during the composite feed-water experiments, attributed to the precipitation of salts on the membrane feed side or pore spaces, which subsequently reduce the membrane pore sizes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9966850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99668502023-02-26 Modification of Cellulose Acetate Microfiltration Membranes Using Graphene Oxide–Polyethyleneimine for Enhanced Dye Rejection Ong, Maria Dominique Vasquez, Isabel Alvarez, Brandon Cho, Dylan R. Williams, Malik B. Vincent, Donovan Ali, Md. Arafat Aich, Nirupam Pinto, Alexandre H. Choudhury, Mahbuboor Rahman Membranes (Basel) Article Pressure-based membrane processes represent excellent water resource recovery prospects from industrial waste streams. In contrast with conventional pretreatment technologies, studies have shown that membrane pretreatment applications, such as microfiltration (MF), are more cost-effective and improve the results of the overall treatment processes. Hence, enhancing rejection efficiency of MF will enhance the performance of any downstream treatment processes. In this study, 0.45 µm cellulose acetate (CA) microfiltration membranes were modified by vacuum filtration-assisted layer-by-layer deposition of bilayers composed of negatively charged graphene oxide (GO) and positively charged polyethyleneimine (PEI). The performance of 1-, 2-, and 4-bilayer GO–PEI-modified membranes were investigated for their dye-rejection of anionic eriochrome black T (EBT) dye and cationic methylene blue (MB) dye in a cross-flow membrane module. As the number of bilayers on the membrane increased, the membrane thicknesses increased, and the deionized (DI) water flux through the membranes decreased from 4877 LMH/bar for the control (no bilayer) membrane to 2890 LMH/bar for the 4-bilayer membrane. Conversely, the dye-rejection performance of the modified membranes increased as increasing bilayers of GO–PEI deposited on the membranes. The anionic EBT dye saw superior rejection (~90% rejection) compared to the cationic MB dye (~80% rejection), which can be attributable to the electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged GO surface and anionic EBT dye. After 50% recovery of the saline and dye-laden feed water, there was an observed drop in DI water fluxes of ~40–41% and 36%, respectively. There was also a slight increase in EBT dye-rejection during the composite feed-water experiments, attributed to the precipitation of salts on the membrane feed side or pore spaces, which subsequently reduce the membrane pore sizes. MDPI 2023-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9966850/ /pubmed/36837646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020143 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ong, Maria Dominique
Vasquez, Isabel
Alvarez, Brandon
Cho, Dylan R.
Williams, Malik B.
Vincent, Donovan
Ali, Md. Arafat
Aich, Nirupam
Pinto, Alexandre H.
Choudhury, Mahbuboor Rahman
Modification of Cellulose Acetate Microfiltration Membranes Using Graphene Oxide–Polyethyleneimine for Enhanced Dye Rejection
title Modification of Cellulose Acetate Microfiltration Membranes Using Graphene Oxide–Polyethyleneimine for Enhanced Dye Rejection
title_full Modification of Cellulose Acetate Microfiltration Membranes Using Graphene Oxide–Polyethyleneimine for Enhanced Dye Rejection
title_fullStr Modification of Cellulose Acetate Microfiltration Membranes Using Graphene Oxide–Polyethyleneimine for Enhanced Dye Rejection
title_full_unstemmed Modification of Cellulose Acetate Microfiltration Membranes Using Graphene Oxide–Polyethyleneimine for Enhanced Dye Rejection
title_short Modification of Cellulose Acetate Microfiltration Membranes Using Graphene Oxide–Polyethyleneimine for Enhanced Dye Rejection
title_sort modification of cellulose acetate microfiltration membranes using graphene oxide–polyethyleneimine for enhanced dye rejection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36837646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020143
work_keys_str_mv AT ongmariadominique modificationofcelluloseacetatemicrofiltrationmembranesusinggrapheneoxidepolyethyleneimineforenhanceddyerejection
AT vasquezisabel modificationofcelluloseacetatemicrofiltrationmembranesusinggrapheneoxidepolyethyleneimineforenhanceddyerejection
AT alvarezbrandon modificationofcelluloseacetatemicrofiltrationmembranesusinggrapheneoxidepolyethyleneimineforenhanceddyerejection
AT chodylanr modificationofcelluloseacetatemicrofiltrationmembranesusinggrapheneoxidepolyethyleneimineforenhanceddyerejection
AT williamsmalikb modificationofcelluloseacetatemicrofiltrationmembranesusinggrapheneoxidepolyethyleneimineforenhanceddyerejection
AT vincentdonovan modificationofcelluloseacetatemicrofiltrationmembranesusinggrapheneoxidepolyethyleneimineforenhanceddyerejection
AT alimdarafat modificationofcelluloseacetatemicrofiltrationmembranesusinggrapheneoxidepolyethyleneimineforenhanceddyerejection
AT aichnirupam modificationofcelluloseacetatemicrofiltrationmembranesusinggrapheneoxidepolyethyleneimineforenhanceddyerejection
AT pintoalexandreh modificationofcelluloseacetatemicrofiltrationmembranesusinggrapheneoxidepolyethyleneimineforenhanceddyerejection
AT choudhurymahbuboorrahman modificationofcelluloseacetatemicrofiltrationmembranesusinggrapheneoxidepolyethyleneimineforenhanceddyerejection