Cargando…

Ballistic Response of a Glass Fiber Composite for Two Levels of Threat

This paper presents the behavior of composite panels based on glass fiber unidirectional fabrics and a bi-component epoxy resin under ballistic impacts that characterize two threat levels: FB2 and FB3, according to EN 1523:2004. The tested panels had characteristics kept in narrow ranges: thickness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ojoc, George Ghiocel, Chiper Titire, Larisa, Munteniță, Cristian, Pîrvu, Cătălin, Sandu, Simona, Deleanu, Lorena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36850321
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15041039
_version_ 1784897138427166720
author Ojoc, George Ghiocel
Chiper Titire, Larisa
Munteniță, Cristian
Pîrvu, Cătălin
Sandu, Simona
Deleanu, Lorena
author_facet Ojoc, George Ghiocel
Chiper Titire, Larisa
Munteniță, Cristian
Pîrvu, Cătălin
Sandu, Simona
Deleanu, Lorena
author_sort Ojoc, George Ghiocel
collection PubMed
description This paper presents the behavior of composite panels based on glass fiber unidirectional fabrics and a bi-component epoxy resin under ballistic impacts that characterize two threat levels: FB2 and FB3, according to EN 1523:2004. The tested panels had characteristics kept in narrow ranges: thickness 18.26 ± 0.22 mm, mass ratio fabrics/panel 0.788 ± 0.015, surface density 27.51 ± 0.26 kg/m(2). After testing the panels, the failure mechanisms of the panel were evidenced by scanning electron microscopy and photographs. Here the authors present a finite-element model at meso scale that was used for evaluating if the composite, initially tested at level FB2 (9 mm FMJ, v(0) = 375 m/s), could withstand the higher level of impact, FB3 (projectile type 0.357 Magnum and impact velocity of v(0) = 433 m/s). Simulation was performed in Explicit Dynamics (Ansys), keeping the same target but changing the projectile for the two different levels of threat. The results of the simulation were encouraging for making tests at level FB3, indicating the importance of alternating actual tests with simulations in order to achieve better protection with reduced surface weight. The simulation illustrated differences in impact duration and number of layers broken on the panel for each level. Validation of the model was based on the number of broken layers and the dimension of the delamination zone between the last two layers. Scanning electron microscopy was used for identifying failure mechanisms at the micro and meso scale. We found that damage to the composite was intensively dependent on impact velocity, this being quantitatively evaluated using the number of layers broken, the effect of delamination on separating layers and the deformation of the last layer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9966928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99669282023-02-26 Ballistic Response of a Glass Fiber Composite for Two Levels of Threat Ojoc, George Ghiocel Chiper Titire, Larisa Munteniță, Cristian Pîrvu, Cătălin Sandu, Simona Deleanu, Lorena Polymers (Basel) Article This paper presents the behavior of composite panels based on glass fiber unidirectional fabrics and a bi-component epoxy resin under ballistic impacts that characterize two threat levels: FB2 and FB3, according to EN 1523:2004. The tested panels had characteristics kept in narrow ranges: thickness 18.26 ± 0.22 mm, mass ratio fabrics/panel 0.788 ± 0.015, surface density 27.51 ± 0.26 kg/m(2). After testing the panels, the failure mechanisms of the panel were evidenced by scanning electron microscopy and photographs. Here the authors present a finite-element model at meso scale that was used for evaluating if the composite, initially tested at level FB2 (9 mm FMJ, v(0) = 375 m/s), could withstand the higher level of impact, FB3 (projectile type 0.357 Magnum and impact velocity of v(0) = 433 m/s). Simulation was performed in Explicit Dynamics (Ansys), keeping the same target but changing the projectile for the two different levels of threat. The results of the simulation were encouraging for making tests at level FB3, indicating the importance of alternating actual tests with simulations in order to achieve better protection with reduced surface weight. The simulation illustrated differences in impact duration and number of layers broken on the panel for each level. Validation of the model was based on the number of broken layers and the dimension of the delamination zone between the last two layers. Scanning electron microscopy was used for identifying failure mechanisms at the micro and meso scale. We found that damage to the composite was intensively dependent on impact velocity, this being quantitatively evaluated using the number of layers broken, the effect of delamination on separating layers and the deformation of the last layer. MDPI 2023-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9966928/ /pubmed/36850321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15041039 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ojoc, George Ghiocel
Chiper Titire, Larisa
Munteniță, Cristian
Pîrvu, Cătălin
Sandu, Simona
Deleanu, Lorena
Ballistic Response of a Glass Fiber Composite for Two Levels of Threat
title Ballistic Response of a Glass Fiber Composite for Two Levels of Threat
title_full Ballistic Response of a Glass Fiber Composite for Two Levels of Threat
title_fullStr Ballistic Response of a Glass Fiber Composite for Two Levels of Threat
title_full_unstemmed Ballistic Response of a Glass Fiber Composite for Two Levels of Threat
title_short Ballistic Response of a Glass Fiber Composite for Two Levels of Threat
title_sort ballistic response of a glass fiber composite for two levels of threat
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9966928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36850321
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15041039
work_keys_str_mv AT ojocgeorgeghiocel ballisticresponseofaglassfibercompositefortwolevelsofthreat
AT chipertitirelarisa ballisticresponseofaglassfibercompositefortwolevelsofthreat
AT muntenitacristian ballisticresponseofaglassfibercompositefortwolevelsofthreat
AT pirvucatalin ballisticresponseofaglassfibercompositefortwolevelsofthreat
AT sandusimona ballisticresponseofaglassfibercompositefortwolevelsofthreat
AT deleanulorena ballisticresponseofaglassfibercompositefortwolevelsofthreat